It will be inside a COSMOS II case. My DDR3 is 1600mhz RIPJAWZ X series 4x4GB for 16GB total.
I have two questions-
First question,
Can I overclock with the stock cooler? How far is safe with the stock cooler? A reasonable and stable OC that can be maintained daily without cooling upgrade?
Second,
For a real OC I need a better CPU cooler and possibly Thermal Compound. YES?
Ok, assuming I do- what should I get.
I can spend $50 on the cooler I am thinking as a good budget.
Reccomend me a CPU cooler and thermal compound if needed.
Lastly,
Where is the best place to go to find the reccomended settings for a good OC on my board and CPU ?
also addressing your other questions, you can OC on the stock cooler... i definitely would not recommend it lol also maybe try searching youtube to see if you can find a video of someone using your motherboard. my 68 chipset board has old school bios and i believe your board uses uefi which i am completely unfamiliar with
It will be inside a COSMOS II case. My DDR3 is 1600mhz RIPJAWZ X series 4x4GB for 16GB total.
I have two questions-
First question,
Can I overclock with the stock cooler? How far is safe with the stock cooler? A reasonable and stable OC that can be maintained daily without cooling upgrade?
Second,
For a real OC I need a better CPU cooler and possibly Thermal Compound. YES?
Ok, assuming I do- what should I get.
I can spend $50 on the cooler I am thinking as a good budget.
Reccomend me a CPU cooler and thermal compound if needed.
Lastly,
Where is the best place to go to find the reccomended settings for a good OC on my board and CPU ?
like joemama said, you can't really beat the coolermaster hyper N520 for under 50.. above 50 the noctuna and thermaltake frio are excellent options. i currently use the coolermaster hyper 212+. that and the n520 give good relative performance to the best heatsinks for around $30. i'd say to pick up the n520 and then maybe some arctic silver 5 thermal compound.
yeah i'm using it now...everything i've read points to it being the best thermal paste. if you can get it for under $10 you can't go wrong.
On their website:
Performance:
3 to 12 degrees centigrade lower CPU full load core temperatures than standard thermal compounds or thermal pads when measured with a calibrated thermal diode imbedded in the CPU core.
yeah i'm using it now...everything i've read points to it being the best thermal paste. if you can get it for under $10 you can't go wrong.
On their website:
Performance:
3 to 12 degrees centigrade lower CPU full load core temperatures than standard thermal compounds or thermal pads when measured with a calibrated thermal diode imbedded in the CPU core.
actually no... http://www.frostytech.com/articlev [...] 390&page=1 in this review they rate the cooler master hyper 212+ as better than the n520... you might consider getting the newly upgraded hyper 212+evo:
like joemama said, you can't really beat the coolermaster hyper N520 for under 50.. above 50 the noctuna and thermaltake frio are excellent options. i currently use the coolermaster hyper 212+. that and the n520 give good relative performance to the best heatsinks for around $30. i'd say to pick up the n520 and then maybe some arctic silver 5 thermal compound.
actually no... http://www.frostytech.com/articlev [...] 390&page=1 in this review they rate the cooler master hyper 212+ as better than the n520... you might consider getting the newly upgraded hyper 212+evo:
yeah sorry i thought the n520 was good but it's airflow isn't as good as the hyper212+ and doesn't have exposed heat pipes. basically there's been a trend in cpu heatsinks to expose the copper heat pipes to the base of the cooler which comes in contact with the CPU... these have found to be very effective in cooling the cpu... the hyper 212+ was such a hit because it used this technique at a low price of $25-30. taking this into consideration i'd either get the hyper 212+ or the evo.... both are tried and true with great performance and i don't think yo could go wrong with either selection. i think the evo performs a little better, but is more expensive.
yeah sorry i thought the n520 was good but it's airflow isn't as good as the hyper212+ and doesn't have exposed heat pipes. basically there's been a trend in cpu heatsinks to expose the copper heat pipes to the base of the cooler which comes in contact with the CPU... these have found to be very effective in cooling the cpu... the hyper 212+ was such a hit because it used this technique at a low price of $25-30. taking this into consideration i'd either get the hyper 212+ or the evo.... both are tried and true with great performance and i don't think yo could go wrong with either selection. i think the evo performs a little better, but is more expensive.
No problem! hope it works out for you. it should come with its own thermal compound, which should suffice. i recommend using a small pea sized amount of thermal compound which then spreads around the processor and heatsink when the pressure of the heatsink is applied.