| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : monitor size vs performance
|
|
Profile: journeyman
More Information
|
I'm looking at replacing my samsung 19inc monitor for a 24inch (maybe 22inch) widescreen for gaming. the only real reason behind it is i want a bigger picture when i play.
|
|
Related Pr oduct
|
Register or
log in to remove.
|
|
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
A 24" lcd monitor wants to play at 1920x1200, it's native resolution. If you currently are at the same resolution with a crt, there should be no difference. If you are playing at a lesser resolution, there will be some impact. The question is, will it be a serious drop that will affect your gameplay. I suspect not. http://www.guru3d.com/category/vga_2/ --------------- E8400-stock, GA-P35-DS3R(rev2.1), Corsair 4x2gb 6400C5, EVGA 8800GTS-512-G92, Vista home premium-64-bit, WD velociraptor-300gb, PC P&C silencer-610, Antec SOLO, 2 x Samsung 275T, Samsung-203b-dvd |
|
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information
|
A 24" LCD monitor doesn't "want to play at 1920x1200". That would be yourself the player. A monitor can be set to play at native resolution or lower resolution depending on what resolution the GPU supports.
--------------- Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | X1900XT 512MB | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi There is no such thing as a stupid question. But there are stupid people. |
|
Profile: newbie
More Information
|
So if your native resolution is at 60 and you up it to 75 what's the drawback...if any...and do you get any benefit or is it not going to get recognized anyway... |
|
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information
|
A native res isn't 60 or 75, thats the refresh rate. Back in the days when people used CRTs, refresh rates mattered. Remember that with CRTs, the gun starts at the top, and starts drawing the image as it moves down. The faster this happens, the better the image looks. The down side is that you need hardware powerful enough to deliver that many images. If you have a higher refresh rate then you can draw images, some with get drawn twice. This has a negative impact on how fluid the game looks. If you deliver more frames then your monitor can draw, some of them get skipped, again effecting how fluid the game looks. Read up on refresh rates and Vsync for more info. None of this is a problem with LCDs as they have no refresh rate. They turn the pixels individually on and off.
--------------- The voice of REASON Do NOT feed the TROLLS! Always a DEMON! |
|
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
My point was, that image quality is best at native resolution, so there is where you would like to play if you can. You can play at lower resolution than native, but never at higher. With CRT's, a high refresh rate was necessary. Without refreshing, the pixel on the crt "died" or dimmed out. It needed to be repainted, just to have a picture. At 60,hz, you got a "shimmering" effect, which was tiring on the eyes. A good CRT at 75hz, or 85hz gave you a steady picture. With a LCD, the pixel just stays where it is set, and the only need for a decent refresh rate is to change the picture. If it can do this at 60hz, as most do, that is all you need to see a clear picture when there is motion.
Message edited by geofelt on 08-06-2008 at 04:31:13 AM --------------- E8400-stock, GA-P35-DS3R(rev2.1), Corsair 4x2gb 6400C5, EVGA 8800GTS-512-G92, Vista home premium-64-bit, WD velociraptor-300gb, PC P&C silencer-610, Antec SOLO, 2 x Samsung 275T, Samsung-203b-dvd |
|
Profile: enthusiast
More Information
|
24" is good if you ever get a blu player , 1080 can be done then. My single EN7800GTX can run a Samsung T240 at native 1920x1200 with no problems. Halo 2 and sins of solar empire run smooth. I havent tried more taxing games yet but I could imagine a problem with allot of fast moving stuff all at once. You definitly have enought power for a 24" screen. Once you get a 24" you can't go back. |
|
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
+1 for the Dell 2408
--------------- If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce today would cost $100, get a million miles to the gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside. PSA |
|
Rocket Scientist
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
The Dell 2408 is a great choice.
|
|
Profile: member
More Information
|
+1 for the dell 2408 , if you want 22" then as everyone will agree it has to be the samsung 226bw |
|
Profile: member
More Information
|
|
|
Profile: member
More Information
|
|
|
Rocket Scientist
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
Yes, but it's less relevant. |
|
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information
|
--------------- Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | X1900XT 512MB | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi There is no such thing as a stupid question. But there are stupid people. |
