Ad
News

AMD introduces fastest K6 yet

Published on February 27, 1999

AMD did its best to rain on Intel's Pentium III parade by simultaneously introducing its 450MHz AMD-K6-2 processor with 3DNow! technology. Read more

AMD threatens IA64 with 'SledgeHammer'

Published on October 06, 1999

Advanced Micro Devices did its best to rain on rival Intel's Itanium parade, revealing new details of its own forthcoming 64-bit processor on the heels of Intel's announcement. Read more

Electric Rain announces high-end presentation tool for Office 2007

Published on January 30, 2007

Highlighting a big Microsoft launch while trying to set itself apart from another, Electric Rain has announced Standout, a presentation slideshow application for Vista that aims to be a better offering than the new Powerpoint available in Office 2007, which also launched today. Read more

Microsoft joins the search privacy parade

Published on July 24, 2007

Redmond (WA) – Microsoft has joined its search engine competitors by vowing to eliminate user information from searches after 18 months. All searches on Microsoft’s Live Search sites will have users’ cookie ids, IP addresses and other identifying informa Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: Performance and Value

Published on October 31, 2008

Three dramatically different builds face off in show of performance, defining the real value of each. Our mainstream system is designed to meet the needs of most users. Who should spend more and who can live with less? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $500 Gaming PC

Published on October 30, 2008

On this, the second to last day of our System Builder Marathon series, we add a $500 gaming PC to the mix. It's not going to be as quick as our other two builds, but we think Paul was able to get some serious value from this thing. Read more

Tom's SBM: The $1,500 Mainstream PC

Published on October 29, 2008

We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more

System Builder Marathon: The $4,500 Super PC

Published on October 28, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon spreads the system prices out even further to $4,500, $1,500, and $500. Is today’s $4,500 system really worth three times as much as an upper-mainstream performance machine? Read more

  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » NVIDIA: soon to rain on x86 parade?
 

NVIDIA: soon to rain on x86 parade?

Advanced Search

There are 321 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : NVIDIA: soon to rain on x86 parade?
 
Poetry in motion
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Here it goes: http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inqu [...] e-x86-chip

Quote :

THE HOT RUMOR going around IDF is one that we discussed a long time ago when Nvidia bought Stexar: that the company will do an x86 part. The background whispers say that the part will be announced next week at Nvision, but we don't see that happening.

The problem NV has is that both major x86 players have a lock on the technology, and they don't want any new players in the mix. NV is basically locked out unless Intel and AMD both decide to be magnanimous, and we would not recommend holding your breath waiting for this to happen.

That leaves the lawsuit option open, and again, it is hard to imagine them being that self-destructive. Any attempt to enter the market without a license would bring down Intel legal on them like flying monkeys blackening the sky. It would get ugly. Really ugly. Expensive too.

So, in the end, the rumors fly, and there might be an attempt to try. Bad rhyming poetry aside, I can't see how it would slide. The chances are slim to none. But... who knows, next week, we just might see one.



Perhaps it might get interesting.


---------------
http://www.fudzilla.com/images/stories/2008/November/General%20News/amd_shanghai.jpg

AMD's MHz run faster than anyone else's - e-kenmac (courtesy from The INQUIRER)
Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Poor news source. Just a week or so ago they posted a story that Nvidia was pulling out of the chipset business. Nividia not only vigorously denied it, they even demanded a retraction.

Poetry in motion
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

snarfies1 wrote :

Poor news source. Just a week or so ago they posted a story that Nvidia was pulling out of the chipset business. Nividia not only vigorously denied it, they even demanded a retraction.



Many sites have reported this possibility. Guess DigiTimes was the first one. Also, don't forget that Nvidia didn't get a QPI license for Nehalem.


---------------
http://www.fudzilla.com/images/stories/2008/November/General%20News/amd_shanghai.jpg

AMD's MHz run faster than anyone else's - e-kenmac (courtesy from The INQUIRER)
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

This seems about right. I'm sure nVidia will atleast attempt to get an X86 license, but it will be very surprising if it works. They pretty much hit the exact truth of it, I guess the inquirer does something right every once and a while.


---------------
What doesn't kill me only pisses me off!
Save the Hippies!!!
Profile: Forum Master
More Information

hmm, long term plan they must have. short term i think they need to focus on other matters.


---------------
don't listen to me I'm a troll

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Profile: member
More Information

nV-VIA hookup will happen eventually, and when it does I will be the first in line.

The Threadkiller
Profile: addict
More Information

dattimr wrote :

Many sites have reported this possibility. Guess DigiTimes was the first one. Also, don't forget that Nvidia didn't get a QPI license for Nehalem.



Wrong, nVidia has a QPI licence and in exchange X58 motherboards can have an nForce 200 chip added to allow for SLi.


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/436956.png
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/368892.png
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

nVidia may want to try a x86 chip but they have to get the license from Intel to do it.

But even if they do get one I will be skepticle of their ability to produce a chip with such little experience in the field. More than likely they will go around buying technologies from the big companies like the IMC and x86-64.


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/381014.png
http://www.alabasterslim.com/0/jimmysmitty.png
BAM!
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

The inquirer are loosing it, they are talking about why a rumour wont happen? who cares?


---------------
"This thread made me strap on my lolerskates and head for my roflcopter."
Profile: journeyman
More Information

It seems a little late in the game to be getting in on x86 production. As dies continue to shrink, it'll take fewer and fewer fabs to produce the world's supply of chips. I'd imagine the competitive challenges for nVidia in this situation would arise more out of intangible goodwill sorts of concerns rather than R&D or manufacturing hurdles.

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

dattimr wrote :

Here it goes: http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inqu [...] e-x86-chip

Quote :

THE HOT RUMOR going around IDF is one that we discussed a long time ago when Nvidia bought Stexar: that the company will do an x86 part. The background whispers say that the part will be announced next week at Nvision, but we don't see that happening.

The problem NV has is that both major x86 players have a lock on the technology, and they don't want any new players in the mix. NV is basically locked out unless Intel and AMD both decide to be magnanimous, and we would not recommend holding your breath waiting for this to happen.

That leaves the lawsuit option open, and again, it is hard to imagine them being that self-destructive. Any attempt to enter the market without a license would bring down Intel legal on them like flying monkeys blackening the sky. It would get ugly. Really ugly. Expensive too.

So, in the end, the rumors fly, and there might be an attempt to try. Bad rhyming poetry aside, I can't see how it would slide. The chances are slim to none. But... who knows, next week, we just might see one.



Perhaps it might get interesting.



Good another player would be healthy for the industry less Intel's legal machine running them into the ground but I honestly think it would be good it would also get a grasp on Intels hold on the industry which could be good or bad, props if they can get it off the ground.

Word, Playa.

Speed Demon
Profile: old hand
More Information

spud wrote :

Good another player would be healthy for the industry less Intel's legal machine running them into the ground but I honestly think it would be good it would also get a grasp on Intels hold on the industry which could be good or bad, props if they can get it off the ground.

Word, Playa.



Not wanting to troll this post, but i must agree, another player in the x86 would be great. Legally well, we shall see about it.
People still play Protoss vs Zerg vs Terran. I guess a third player with a different approach to the x86 market will only make it healthy.

And what about x86-64 license ? It is still included in the base x86 ? it is a subject i don't really know.


---------------
Rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read - Frank Zappa
Poetry in motion
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

radnor wrote :

Not wanting to troll this post, but i must agree, another player in the x86 would be great. Legally well, we shall see about it.
People still play Protoss vs Zerg vs Terran. I guess a third player with a different approach to the x86 market will only make it healthy.

And what about x86-64 license ? It is still included in the base x86 ? it is a subject i don't really know.



Good question. From what I have read it looks like Intel got the x86-64 licence from AMD through a deal (funny, huh?), but I don't have any links to back that. However, if that is true, it's a clear sign that x86 and x86-64 mean different licences. Guess I'll google that.


---------------
http://www.fudzilla.com/images/stories/2008/November/General%20News/amd_shanghai.jpg

AMD's MHz run faster than anyone else's - e-kenmac (courtesy from The INQUIRER)
Poetry in motion
Profile: enthusiast
More Information