Ad
News

512 MB microSD cards to become mainstream in Q2, says SanDisk

Published on March 03, 2006

With rising demand from multimedia-enabled handsets, 512MB microSD cards will become mainstream in the SD memory card market in the second quarter of this year, according to sources at SanDisk Taiwan. Read more

VisionTek GOes after Portable Storage Biz

Published on July 18, 2003

VisionTek today introduced a line of Full-Speed and Hi-Speed USB 2.0 portable storage drives. Read more

Webride: Graphics card related articles on the web:

Published on August 26, 2004

Beginners Guides: Flashing a Video Card BIOS - PCstats BFGTech GeForce 6800 OC - HardOCP.com HIS Excalibur AIW 9600 - Bjorn3d MSI GeForce 6800 - VR-ZoneHardware MSI PCX5750-TD128 - ViperLair NVIDIA GeForce 6600 - CoolTechZone NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT PCI Express - Beyond3D PowerColor Radeon 9250 128MB - SystemCooling Sapphire X600 Pro VIVO 256MB - PimpRig Sapphire Radeon X800 XT - Gamer's Depot Read more

Albatron introduces 256MB GeForce FX 5600 graphics cards

Published on June 11, 2003

Albatron Technology recently introduced a new graphics card, the FX5600EQ, which adopts Nvidia's GeForce FX 5600 graphics chip and is equipped with 256MB memory. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

Stalker: Clear Sky--Is Your System Ready?

Published on September 30, 2008

Thinking about picking up the latest update to Stalker, but not sure if your graphics subsystem can handle it? Hang on as we take you through a performance tour and demonstrate how the game has been prettied up. Read more

Part 4: Avivo HD Vs. PureVideo HD

Published on September 29, 2008

The 780G chipset/Radeon HD 3200 and the MCP78S chipset/GeForce 8200 provide the first integrated graphics solutions that can accelerate Blu-ray playback. We dig deep into how well they work with high quality Blu-ray 1080p video playback. Read more

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more

Maxtor's Shared Storage Does NAS At Home

Published on September 25, 2008

What do you do with all the data you collect at home? Network attached storage is the solution. We test Maxtor's Shared Storage II and find that it is also suitable for use in small businesses. Read more

  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » GeForce 8800 GT 256MB versus Radeon HD 2600XT 512MB
 

GeForce 8800 GT 256MB versus Radeon HD 2600XT 512MB

Advanced Search

Games General : djcoolmasterx and 134 unknown users
Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : GeForce 8800 GT 256MB versus Radeon HD 2600XT 512MB
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

The current cards in question:

GIGABYTE GV-NX88T256HV1 GeForce 8800 GT 256MB 256-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP
SAPPHIRE 100218L Radeon HD 2600XT 512MB 128-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16 HDCP

Just looking for some advice on a replacement card for my old Radeon x700 because the heatsink crapped out, among other things. I'm open to cards other than these, as well.

I've read the short list, which recommends the ATI 2600XT (as a tie) for <$100, and the Nvidia 8800 GT 512 mb for <175$. I don't know how 256 mb vs 512 mb makes a difference in that recommendation. My board has one PCI x16 slot, so no cross/SLI.

Currents specs:
P4 2.80 ghz CPU
1 gig memory (2x 512, unsure of what it was)
500 w supply
800 MHz FSB

What I want to play:
Source engine games
Oblivion
Sins of a solar empire

What else I need it to do:
Output to my crappy TV (I think that's universal by now?)
Not sound like the space shuttle taking off (The CPU is bad enough)

Budget: under $75, but under $100 if it really matters. I just want to change my card, as that is the only thing causing my grief at this time.

Thank you very much for your time.

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: old hand
More Information

8800. 8800 ANYTHING. 2600 is crap, I don't care how much RAM it has. Just as giant rims on a Corsica does not a sports car make, lots of RAM on a weak graphics core doesn't make it perform any better. They could put 4 GB of RAM on a 2600 it would still be worthless. So, in conclusion, 8800. Whether it's a GS or a GT 256, buy an 8800. Or a 3870, if it's cheap enough.

Profile: old hand
More Information

Now, on to the rest of your computer. It is causing you grief too. You don't notice it because you are focused on your GPU, but a P4 2.8 and 1GB of RAM doesn't cut it anymore. Start saving up for those next.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

4850 is nice

Serenity Now!
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

He said a budget of 100$, the 4850 is generally 160+

EDIT: My suggestion is hold off on buying anything for a couple of more weeks, see how the prices drop and make a new system.

Don't combine old with new, you'll bottleneck you PC:)


Message edited by L1qu1d on 07-05-2008 at 06:17:47 PM

---------------
L1qu1dat1on Ag3
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.6, RAM: 8 gig OCZ 1:1, Fan: Water Cooling, Mobo:Striker II Formula, HDD: 2x's 150 Raptor (RAID 0), VGA: 280 GTX TRI PSU:CorsairHX1000 Windows Vista Ultimate 64
Profile: stranger
More Information

MrsBytch wrote :

Quote :

Budget: under $75, but under $100 if it really matters.



What? that makes no sense.



As in if someone can make an extremely convincing argument. Under 75 is the "preferred" zone, but 100 is if someone constructs a sound reasoning to.


MrsBytch wrote :

Your first upgrade should be your ram. 1gb is not enough for any game made in the last 4 years.

If your going to get a 8800GT, then I'd suggest the 512mb. However I have the 256mb version and it works great for me. I dont go over 1280x1024. It plays COD4 smooth as butter on high. I get 10,700 3dmarks in Vista.

You really should check out the 8800GS.



1 gb has been working fine and dandy. The ONLY reason I'm replacing my card is because the fan is off its bearings and is grinding. Usually I'd add some oil in the shaft, but I'm too lazy and was thinking about getting a card for kicks.

nvalhalla wrote :

8800. 8800 ANYTHING. 2600 is crap, I don't care how much RAM it has. Just as giant rims on a Corsica does not a sports car make, lots of RAM on a weak graphics core doesn't make it perform any better. They could put 4 GB of RAM on a 2600 it would still be worthless. So, in conclusion, 8800. Whether it's a GS or a GT 256, buy an 8800. Or a 3870, if it's cheap enough.



Take it up with this list:
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] ards-money

Any reason you object to it? Apart from generalized statements, like "it's crap".

nvalhalla wrote :

Now, on to the rest of your computer. It is causing you grief too. You don't notice it because you are focused on your GPU, but a P4 2.8 and 1GB of RAM doesn't cut it anymore. Start saving up for those next.



No it's not. Everything runs *fine*, even with my current card. Team Fortress runs excellently, I get headshots in counterstrike, and I gallop around in oblivion all the time. I don't care to play any new games except for Diablo III or SC II, which blizzard wants to be widely available (Read: runs on low req). And if they did, they aren't coming out a for a great while, so by the time I'd need to worry would be a year from now.

I just want sound recommendations for a decent, low priced replacement for my x700, that won't be bottlenecked by my system. What I don't want is fanboyism, or recs that I sell my firstborn to buy a new system, that I don't need to play what I want proficiently (i.e. 2-3 yr old games on1280x1024 on medium settings, not 9999x9999 on max extreme detail).

Hell, forget I mentioned those two cards. They happened to be in my price range with positive reviews on newegg. I have a simple question: What's the best card for this system?

Not the best card for god's setup, or anything else. Just the for this rig, as it stands, period. If I wanted recommendations for a new system, I would have asked for one. You're wasting your own time and my own if your post contains "new setup" or any like iteration.

Windows XP, by the way.


Message edited by LocoLoki on 07-05-2008 at 06:25:11 PM
yes i know fanboyish but who cares
Profile: addict
More Information

LocoLoki wrote :

The current cards in question:

GIGABYTE GV-NX88T256HV1 GeForce 8800 GT 256MB 256-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP
SAPPHIRE 100218L Radeon HD 2600XT 512MB 128-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16 HDCP

Just looking for some advice on a replacement card for my old Radeon x700 because the heatsink crapped out, among other things. I'm open to cards other than these, as well.

I've read the short list, which recommends the ATI 2600XT (as a tie) for <$100, and the Nvidia 8800 GT 512 mb for <175$. I don't know how 256 mb vs 512 mb makes a difference in that recommendation. My board has one PCI x16 slot, so no cross/SLI.

Currents specs:
P4 2.80 ghz CPU
1 gig memory (2x 512, unsure of what it was)
500 w supply
800 MHz FSB

What I want to play:
Source engine games
Oblivion
Sins of a solar empire

What else I need it to do:
Output to my crappy TV (I think that's universal by now?)
Not sound like the space shuttle taking off (The CPU is bad enough)

Budget: under $75, but under $100 if it really matters. I just want to change my card, as that is the only thing causing my grief at this time.

Thank you very much for your time.



if ur Budget is 75 to 100
whats this about

"and the Nvidia 8800 GT 512 mb for <175$."

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

For your purposes, of the two cards you listed the 8800GT is the better card. The ATI2600 is not really up to doing the job. I say this as an objective user, although my personal preference is for ATI, my budget allows me to run the higher priced cards if I so choose.


---------------
Never under estimate peoples capacity for stupidity, and you won't be disappointed.
Profile: stranger
More Information

rangers wrote :

if ur Budget is 75 to 100
whats this about

"and the Nvidia 8800 GT 512 mb for <175$."



What I had said:

Quote :

I've read the short list, which recommends the ATI 2600XT (as a tie) for <$100, and the Nvidia 8800 GT 512 mb for <175$



I've read the short list

The short list, which is sticky'ed at the top of the forum:
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] ards-money

The list recommends the 512, I'm asking about the 256. The 256 is not on the list. I added this to reference that I had indeed looked at some of the available resources here before posting.

Here's a hint for you:
Read ==> Comprehend ==> Post

rgsaunders wrote :

For your purposes, of the two cards you listed the 8800GT is the better card. The ATI2600 is not really up to doing the job. I say this as an objective user, although my personal preference is for ATI, my budget allows me to run the higher priced cards if I so choose.



Fair enough, thanks.


Message edited by LocoLoki on 07-05-2008 at 07:10:22 PM
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

as dated as the system is my vote goes for teh ati 2600hd. it's cheaper and makes a good REPLACEMENT for your x700 at least until you can build a new system altogether.

and 8800gt my require more amps then your psu can deliver if it's an older 500 watt psu.

Profile: old hand
More Information

For some one asking for help you are quite rude. Get this instead:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814103051

ATI is still making drivers for it and will for a long time unlike the 8800s, and with the newer drivers it seems it outperforms the 8800 GT 256mb. Guess what, I:

Read ==> Comprehended ==> Posted


---------------
Blasphemy is the spice of life.
kad
Profile: addict
More Information

You said it yourself
ATI 2600XT<100$
It will be a good replacement for your X700


---------------
LianLi PC-A70 Case/Enermaqx Galaxy 1000W/Asus Rampage Formula/E8500/Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme Lapped/Scythe S-Flex SFF21F/Crucial Ballistic Red Line DDR2800 PC6400(2X2)GB/8800GTS 512MB/WD Raptor2X150GB/ViewSonic VX922(1280X1024Max)
Profile: newbie
More Information

The 2600XT can't really be compared to the 8800GT. Forget buffer size. but since you won't be playing Assassin's Creed, UT3, Bioshock, Crysis, Mass Effect, DMC... the 2600XT would be enough for now, and save you money for an upgrade.
Although you're probably right about Blizzard (may God bless them), you have to consider if you want to play D3 and SC2 on low settings. RTS games are specially demanding CPU-wise.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information



if u wana play the above games den 2600 xt is ok.........performance will b the same as x700.more or less
but u cant compare 8800 GT with 2600

2600xt ties with 8600GT
"BEST PCI-E CARD FOR UNDER $100: TIE
Radeon 2600 XT
Geforce 8600 GT GDDR3 "


---------------
x2 5600+@2.8; 2GB RAM 800Mhz; xfx 9600GT xt; 320GB HDD; 420W thermaltake PSU
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Probably need a complete overhaul for the system, I would save the money up for a complete system change.

I'll Be Back - Arnold
Profile: journeyman
More Information

get the radeon 3850 that The_blood_raven suggested

Profile: newbie
More Information

So this is a really easy question to answer... the 8800gt 256mb takes the cake, no doubt about it.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814125089

yes thats what you should buy

Profile: addict
More Information
n°1838126
07-05-2008 at 09:32:21 PM