Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Q6600 better overclocker chip?
 

Q6600 better overclocker chip?

Advanced Search

Homebuilt Systems : Dark Comet Storage : andr1us Graphic & Displays : pollitt Windows XP : muz_j and 63 unknown users
Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Q6600 better overclocker chip?
 
Profile: newbie
More Information

I just bought a new Q6600 and I hear there are chips that were made different and better for overclocking can someone explain this?  Heres my specs.
 
http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh135/LB_Specter/cpuz.jpg

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

I think you might be talking about the G0 stepping, which overclocks better than the older B3. Looks like you have G0.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

you have speedstep enabled, and run realtemp to see what your vid is.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

The 45nm core 2 chips may reach higher frequencies than their 65nm counterparts.

Profile: addict
More Information

If you have just bought a new Q6600 then the cpu's that clock higher will be costing you more, so unless you have a genuine purpose for it stick with the Q6600 because it's great value right now, spend what you've saved on graphics or a monitor upgrade.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

As far as certain q6600 OCing better then other there are 2 big things to look at.  First is the revision.  The older B3 do not OC higher then the newer G0 steppings.  Second is the VID, from what i understand the lower the VID the better.  Your VID looks to be around 1.2 which is ideal. Some chips will be closer to 1.3 to 1.4 which means there is less headway to up the core voltage when OCing.

Profile: newbie
More Information

nice, great info guys. thanks.  will start to overclock soon.

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

^Lucky you. Thats what my stock voltage was at before I OCed. Now I have mine at 3GHz with a voltage of 1.225v. Its nice to get lucky now and then.


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/381014.png
Profile: newbie
More Information

jimmy that is before I overclocked.   :(   are you saying im only going to get to 3ghz!!  yikes.

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

^No. Yours is at a great stock voltage. Mine was at 1.18v when I ran it at stock 2.4GHz. Now at 3GHz I have my voltage at 1.225v.
 
The stock voltage for a Q6600 is normally 1.3v. And it can go all the way up to 1.5v (that being the worst case scenario).
 
What this means is you can probably OC to 3.4GHz+ on air and be able to keep your voltage lower resulting in better temps.


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/381014.png
Profile: member
More Information

Am I not understanding what I am reading in his picture for core speed?  Is there something wrong here, should it not say 2400.xMHz instead of 1600.2MHz

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Speed step is on, drops the the multiplier and core voltage to safe energy.

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

^you are right on the first part but funny thing is when my CPU is idle its voltage is higher than when under load. This could of course be because of VDroop being higher when under load.
 
Its only by like .005v but still its strange


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/381014.png
Profile: member
More Information

Ah! I thought CPU-Z did a few calculations to turn it off but I see the multiplier now.  Thanks Knew it must be something I was  overlooking.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

run coretemp or realtemp to find out vid, cpu-z doesn't tell you vid.

Profile: newbie
More Information

Go to:
Add a reply
  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Q6600 better overclocker chip?
 

Google ads