Ad
News

Sony Offers Free DVD Burner Upgrade

Published on January 14, 2004

Beginning next month, owners of Sony's 530 series of DVD drives can upgrade to 8X DVD-R and 4X DVD-RW recording speeds for free. Read more

Hitachi intros hard drive upgrade kit for notebooks

Published on September 07, 2005

Hitachi is set to offer a hard drive upgrade for notebooks that people will be able to install themselves. Read more

Want to upgrade that G3? Think different. . .

Published on September 04, 1999

Owners of Apple Power Mac G3s can't upgrade to Motorola's new G4 chip. Read more

DVD+RW drives in shock 'no upgrade' situation

Published on April 11, 2002

Owners of DVD+RW drives who thought they'd be able to upgrade them to use cheaper write-once DVD+R media via a firmware upgrade are out of luck, and the DVD+RW Alliance would appear to have egg on its face. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

Part 4: Avivo HD Vs. PureVideo HD

Published on September 29, 2008

The 780G chipset/Radeon HD 3200 and the MCP78S chipset/GeForce 8200 provide the first integrated graphics solutions that can accelerate Blu-ray playback. We dig deep into how well they work with high quality Blu-ray 1080p video playback. Read more

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more

Maxtor's Shared Storage Does NAS At Home

Published on September 25, 2008

What do you do with all the data you collect at home? Network attached storage is the solution. We test Maxtor's Shared Storage II and find that it is also suitable for use in small businesses. Read more

SLI & Centrino 2: Gaming Laptops Battle

Published on September 24, 2008

Take four gaming laptops. Arm two of them with SLI and make the others Centrino 2-compatible. You're looking at a high-end collection of the latest mobile technology battling it out for benchmark supremacy and your hard-earned dollars. Read more

Relatives contents
  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Solidworks is killing me! What do I need to upgrade?
 

Solidworks is killing me! What do I need to upgrade?

Advanced Search

There are 377 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here
Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Solidworks is killing me! What do I need to upgrade?
 
Profile: newbie
More Information

My brother was recently hired to do CAD work for a small company that has never had someone to do CAD until now. The computer that they gave him to run the latest release of Solidworks is a Dell Vostro 200, which is essentially a computer you'd buy for Granny to surf the interwebs and download pictures of the grandkids. Here are the specs:

Intel Pentium Dual Core 2160
2 GB DDR2 PC5300
Onboard video
Windows XP Pro 32 bit

To make a long story short he informed his boss that he needs a workstation class machine with an engineering graphics card etc to run the program. Their solution was for my brother to go to Fry's and buy the parts needed to make it work. Unfortuantely Fry's does not stock nVidia Quadro or ATI FireGL cards so he picked up an HD 4850 along with a more powerful Antec power supply. He got it installed and working but still has issues zooming in on small parts, the computer lags and slows to a crawl for a few seconds each time.

The most logical (and cost effective) answer to this problem is to return the Vostro and buy a Precision workstation with the right specs, unfortunately that is not an option.

Any ideas as to what is bottlenecking this PC? Per task manager and the symptoms described I have a feeling the CPU is underpowered but I'd like a second opinion before sending my brother out to pick up a more powerful Core 2 or Quad. I've read online that Solidworks is fairly CPU intensive, does it scale well with 4 cores? If so I may send my brother after an e6600. I know the graphics card isn't ideal for openGL but it should be enough considering it is one of the more powerful graphics cards on the market right now. He could buy another gig of ram but after that he'll hit the limitation for a 32 bit OS.


Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

cjl
Rocket Scientist
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Solidworks loves CPU speed. Graphics cards are nice too, but it only works with the Quadro and FireGL parts (it actually checks the driver), so the 4850 is doing nothing to help him. The biggest thing you could do to help that out is to get a nice fast quad core.

Profile: newbie
More Information

the CPU has to be slowing everything down. at school all our cad machines have dedicated graphics and significantly faster processors.

Profile: addict
More Information

Workstation cards are tweaked to be very accurate in their display at high levels of zoom - that is one of their major advantages over gamer cards (that, and specialized drivers and application accelerators).

If you can return the hd4850 you might be able to find one of these cards which can be soft-modded to a FireGL ...

2600pro -> FireGL v3600
2600xt --> FireGL v5600
2900pro -> FireGL v7600 / v8600
2900xt --> FireGL v8600
HD3850 - > FireGL v8650
HD3870 - > FireGL V7700
HD3870 - > FireGL v8650
HD3870 - > FireStream 9170

Check out ...
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=237273
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=255976


I picked up 2 HD 2900 pros on the cheap and am lovin' my soft mods to FireGL :) I don't use Solidworks but it seems from some of the posted comments that it works really well ....


Reformulated with 20 percent less ahole !
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

That cpu is pretty weak !


---------------
X2 5400+, Biostar TA780G M2+ MATX, 2 gig mushkin, 8800gts 512 , CM 532, Kingwin 450w ATX 2.2

"Now if the 4870x2 was actually notably faster than the 280 for about the same price, then I might even take a chance on it. However, that won't be the case."
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

CPU. Check Dells support cuz the mobo needs to be able to handle it. If you can quad will do him better.


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/381014.png
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

azmtbkr81 wrote :

My brother was recently hired to do CAD work for a small company that has never had someone to do CAD until now. The computer that they gave him to run the latest release of Solidworks is a Dell Vostro 200, which is essentially a computer you'd buy for Granny to surf the interwebs and download pictures of the grandkids. Here are the specs:

Intel Pentium Dual Core 2160
2 GB DDR2 PC5300
Onboard video
Windows XP Pro 32 bit

To make a long story short he informed his boss that he needs a workstation class machine with an engineering graphics card etc to run the program. Their solution was for my brother to go to Fry's and buy the parts needed to make it work. Unfortuantely Fry's does not stock nVidia Quadro or ATI FireGL cards so he picked up an HD 4850 along with a more powerful Antec power supply. He got it installed and working but still has issues zooming in on small parts, the computer lags and slows to a crawl for a few seconds each time.

The most logical (and cost effective) answer to this problem is to return the Vostro and buy a Precision workstation with the right specs, unfortunately that is not an option.

Any ideas as to what is bottlenecking this PC? Per task manager and the symptoms described I have a feeling the CPU is underpowered but I'd like a second opinion before sending my brother out to pick up a more powerful Core 2 or Quad. I've read online that Solidworks is fairly CPU intensive, does it scale well with 4 cores? If so I may send my brother after an e6600. I know the graphics card isn't ideal for openGL but it should be enough considering it is one of the more powerful graphics cards on the market right now. He could buy another gig of ram but after that he'll hit the limitation for a 32 bit OS.



Unfortunately you're going to have trouble running solidworks on pretty much any Dell system. At my company we have our CAD guys running solidworks on Dell's top of the line workstations and they're still dogs. I believe that starting with version 2001Plus the Solidworks people tried to make the program look pretty and succeeded mainly in making it 10 times more a a resource hog that it used to be (I used to be able to run SW 2001 on a P3 800MHz with an S3 IGP). Turning off some of the useless eye candy functions such as shadows and lighting in the options panel will go a long way towards making it more usable.

Other than that, the other posters here have provided some good advice.

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

^For a CPU get a Q6600. @ $200 bucks its a steal.


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/381014.png
Profile: addict
More Information

I agree with jimmy, has to be the best value cpu right now.

Speed Demon
Profile: old hand
More Information

There are some tweaks you could to with that machine.

You could always overclock that 2160 a bit, it would be noticeable.
Read the soft mobs part already recommended on this thread. Your Brother will notice a huge difference.
One personal note (risky). Tell your brother to disable the swap file and get rid of the virtual memory. if the projects he works arent too big it should be stable. You will force OS to load everything to the RAM.
If it is stable, the performance leap is notorious. Lets hope 2Gbs can do it.


have fun !!


---------------
Rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read - Frank Zappa
Poetic AMD cheerleader
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

^ Maybe his brother should upgrade to 4GB DDR-800 DC RAM?

I'm sure these are RAM intensive application?

cjl
Rocket Scientist
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Very true. Especially for larger files, SolidWorks loves memory.

Profile: newbie
More Information

amdfangirl wrote :

^ Maybe his brother should upgrade to 4GB DDR-800 DC RAM?

I'm sure these are RAM intensive application?




Yes they are very much so. We have solidworks where I work and it is a memory hog. 4gb would help a good deal. XP 32bit can read up to 3.5gb of it and as cheap as it is right now, it makes the most sense. The 4850 should be a good deal better than the onboard. CPU needs an upgrade if possible. Q6600 would be an ideal chip for such work. We have dual Xeon quad workstations that can crawl running some of the cad software we have. Especially the simulation stuff.


Message edited by mossberg on 08-04-2008 at 03:39:37 AM

---------------
Antec 900,750w Corsair, Gigabyte P35-DS3L, E2180 Allendale @3.0ghz, 4gb g-skill ddr2 800, 200gb Seagate, Hd 3870
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

^A little off topic but for some reason when I see your post your voice comes out like Worfs.....maybe its the pic.


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/381014.png
Poetic AMD cheerleader
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

What does mine sound like?


Go to:
Add a reply
  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Solidworks is killing me! What do I need to upgrade?
 

Google ads