Ad
News

Sandisk introduces 8GB JEDEC-compatible iNAND

Published on February 12, 2007

Today at the ongoing 3GSM World Congress 2007 in Barcelona, Spain, Sandisk introduced a new version if its iNAND embedded flash drive (EFD), which the company says is compatible with a standard issued by the JC-64.1 subcommittee of the JEDEC Solid State Technology Association (formerly known as the Joint Electron Device Engineering Council), the semiconductor engineering standardization body of the Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA). Read more

JEDEC issues in Sun, Kinsgton suit

Published on February 25, 2001

In another article by Jack Robertson, the ongoing patent infringement suit by Sun Microsystems against Kingston Technology is compared to the battle between Rambus Inc. Read more

Despite MMC Association and JEDEC collaboration, Samsung still dominates MMC platform

Published on March 22, 2006

With the MultiMediaCard Association (MMCA) and JEDEC recently announcing they will collaborate to develop a joint set of MMC memory card standards, Taiwan memory card makers expect the partnership to help counter the growing power of Samsung Electronics on the MMC platform, according to local memory card makers. Read more

JEDEC firms up DDR 2 standard

Published on September 12, 2003

Memory standard board JEDEC said over 100 companies had agreed on the acceptance of a standard for double data rate two (DDR2) memory technology. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

Stalker: Clear Sky--Is Your System Ready?

Published on September 30, 2008

Thinking about picking up the latest update to Stalker, but not sure if your graphics subsystem can handle it? Hang on as we take you through a performance tour and demonstrate how the game has been prettied up. Read more

Part 4: Avivo HD Vs. PureVideo HD

Published on September 29, 2008

The 780G chipset/Radeon HD 3200 and the MCP78S chipset/GeForce 8200 provide the first integrated graphics solutions that can accelerate Blu-ray playback. We dig deep into how well they work with high quality Blu-ray 1080p video playback. Read more

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more

Maxtor's Shared Storage Does NAS At Home

Published on September 25, 2008

What do you do with all the data you collect at home? Network attached storage is the solution. We test Maxtor's Shared Storage II and find that it is also suitable for use in small businesses. Read more

Relatives contents
  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Motherboards & Memory » Memory » Ram timings: JEDEC vs EPP in CPU-Z
 

Ram timings: JEDEC vs EPP in CPU-Z

Advanced Search

There are 291 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Ram timings: JEDEC vs EPP in CPU-Z
 
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

I have a question for someone really quick.

I have 2 gig's of ddr2 800 MHz 4-4-3-5 G. Skill ram. Under CPU-Z there are 3 sections JEDEC #1 JEDEC #2 and EPP. Im Trying to figure out which one of these shows the correct timings of the ram. I know it isn't JEDEC 1 because that one says the ram is only running at 333 MHz and i have manually clocked it to 400 MHz. However both JEDEC 2 and EPP have the ram running at 400 MHz.

The JEDEC 2 has the timings at 5-5-5-15 where the EPP has the timings at the advertised 4-4-3-5. I have the timings on the ram set to auto in the bios because the mobo wont let me manually change the tRAS bellow 9. I am wondering if i am getting the advertised 4-4-3-5 (as EPP says) or if im getting 5-5-5-15 (as the JEDEC says)

Thanks in advance :sol:

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: member
More Information

Under CpuZ, click on the "memory" tab.. Whatever frequency and timings are given there is the "ONLY" correct one... U r probably looking at the "SPD" tab where the plausible timings for various common frequencies are given.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

5-5-5-15 under memory tab... thats too bad. Looks like its time to flash the bios / manually clock it to as tight as i can get it (probably 4-4-4-9)

Thank you :)

Profile: member
More Information

no need to flash or clear ur CMOS/BIOS... Just tighten ur timings one-by-one to as tight as u can get it.. U can probably get it at ur EPP of 4-4-3-5.. Go for it!

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

^ Agreed. The SPD tab shows the timings at the various speeds that the manufacturer says are the correct ones for that specific RAM.

I'm proud of myself,because i'm from IRAN
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

I don't think its necessary to lower them to 4-4-4-9 if u want to OC, i think 4-4-4-12 or 4-4-4-15 would fine

Zorg, i have a question,my RAMs default timing is 4-4-4-15(and i haven't changed it) but u said that SPD shows the correct timings for the specific RAM and 4-4-4-15 isn't in the list


---------------
Q6600@3.4,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,OCZ 4GB DDR2 800 RAM 4-4-4-15,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA X38,SEAGATE 500GB 7200RPM 32MB,TT V1 CPU Cooler,TT ARMOR SILVER ALUMNIUM With 25cm FAN,OCZ MODXSTREAM 900W,LG 2284F 1680x1050
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

Well what's in the list?

 

They aren't the only timings that can be used, they are the recommended lowest timings. Mobos usually have the default timings set higher to ensure that they boot.

 

It also doesn't mean that the RAM won't run at tighter timings than what is in the SPD. These timings cover their butts as well. They don't want the SPD so tight that the RAM gets flaky, although I'm sure that they feel the competitive pressure to make them as low as they can, because it looks better on the package.

 


Message edited by Zorg on 07-01-2008 at 01:12:21 PM
I'm proud of myself,because i'm from IRAN
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

Well my RAM has 4-4-4-15 timings and the SPD page is like this:

http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/74f115e2bb.jpg


---------------
Q6600@3.4,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,OCZ 4GB DDR2 800 RAM 4-4-4-15,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA X38,SEAGATE 500GB 7200RPM 32MB,TT V1 CPU Cooler,TT ARMOR SILVER ALUMNIUM With 25cm FAN,OCZ MODXSTREAM 900W,LG 2284F 1680x1050
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

Your FSB is 356 so you are a little higher than 333 and lower than 400. You could try the 4,4,4,13 or 4,4,4,12 and see if it is stable, but to be honest I don't think you will see any real world improvement. Sure the benches will get a little better but that won't carry over with the core 2 arch. I would keep it where it is. It's stable and lowering it won't really help.

 


Message edited by Zorg on 07-01-2008 at 01:51:54 PM
I'm proud of myself,because i'm from IRAN
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

Yeah its stable and as u said i dont think moving from 4-4-4-15 to 4-4-4-12 would make a noticeable difference
Thanx for the help :)


---------------
Q6600@3.4,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,OCZ 4GB DDR2 800 RAM 4-4-4-15,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA X38,SEAGATE 500GB 7200RPM 32MB,TT V1 CPU Cooler,TT ARMOR SILVER ALUMNIUM With 25cm FAN,OCZ MODXSTREAM 900W,LG 2284F 1680x1050
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

i might just go 4-4-4-12. The reason that i can't lower it to the advertised 4-4-3-5 is that my motherboard wont let me put the tRAS (the 5) manually bellow a 9 (which is why i was considering updating the bios). However i have my cpu running a 20% oc at 3.2 GHz right now, and i will probably push that up to 3.6 in the coming days, so 4-4-4-12 timings should work fine so that i can keep the 1:1 ratio :)

So im curious, you normally see ram at 5-5-5-15 or 4-4-4-12. Is there some reason why it is more stable that way or could you just as realistically use any numbers and have a stable system (for say 3-7-2-15)?

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

Go to:
 
  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Motherboards & Memory » Memory » Ram timings: JEDEC vs EPP in CPU-Z

Google ads