Ad
News

Big anomalies found in 3DMark03

Published on July 31, 2003

There's an interesting report on Ace's Hardware today called 3DMark03 Performance Factors. Read more

RADEON 7000 and 7200 on Tap

Published on October 03, 2001

ATI just released two new additions to its RADEON family, the RADEON 7000 and RADEON 7200 boards, both of which have an MSRP of under $100. Read more

ATI Technologies unwraps Radeon 9550

Published on March 29, 2004

ATI has yet another DX9 graphics card going to the market. Read more

GeCube and Sapphire launch ATI Radeon X1900 series cards

Published on January 27, 2006

GeCube and Sapphire Technology have each launched graphics card based on the three new X1900 series graphics chips recently launched by ATI Technologies. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more

Maxtor's Shared Storage Does NAS At Home

Published on September 25, 2008

What do you do with all the data you collect at home? Network attached storage is the solution. We test Maxtor's Shared Storage II and find that it is also suitable for use in small businesses. Read more

SLI & Centrino 2: Gaming Laptops Battle

Published on September 24, 2008

Take four gaming laptops. Arm two of them with SLI and make the others Centrino 2-compatible. You're looking at a high-end collection of the latest mobile technology battling it out for benchmark supremacy and your hard-earned dollars. Read more

1,000 GB: Three Samsung TB Drives

Published on September 23, 2008

Storage vendors split the desktop hard drive market into performance, mainstream, and energy-efficient products. We looked at Samsung’s Spinpoint F, the RAID version and the EcoGreen F to discover how a 1,000 GB drive differs from another. Read more

 

Radeon HD4870 Benchmark

Advanced Search

There are 99 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
 Page : 1 2 3 4 5
Previous
Author
 Thread : Radeon HD4870 Benchmark
 
Profile: stranger
More Information
Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information


Looks like ATI finally widened the bottleneck that held back 3870. If that review is real, of course. Lol@ "Legit Review forum" :na:


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 X38 chipset motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB 7200rpm 32mb cache hdd, 850watt 12v rails=4x20amp powersupply
Profile: stranger
More Information

Yeah, that site provides two sources for the benchmarks.

I'm not sure what language they're in or how credible they are.

Profile: old hand

Wowie!! False hope or not, it sure made me happy! :)


---------------
Intel E6750 * Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L * Galaxy 8800GT 512mb 620MHz* Corsair VX450 * 2GB Transcend 667* 2x120GB Seagate SATA * Altec Lansing ATP3*
Sailing in my Dreams
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

If this review is real, then I know what my next upgrade will be. I might even take two cards for good measure.


---------------
Evil lurks in the databanks as it lurked in the streets of yesteryear. But it was never the streets that were evil.

Over 50. Seen it, done it, can't remember it.
Master-de-bater
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

I'm liking this, let's hope it's true. Might be the first time in my life to go red.


---------------
"Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
Just my two frames' worth.
Profile: Graphic Gorilla
More Information

Even if true, a little dissapointing they don't have any AA in the tests, and conspicuous by it's absence.


---------------
You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

TheGreatGrapeApe wrote :

Even if true, a little dissapointing they don't have any AA in the tests, and conspicuous by it's absence.


If those benchmarks are real, it's such a huge gap that AA won't matter. Run it at 3 times the resolution, and you won't see the jagged edges anyway. :p


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 X38 chipset motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB 7200rpm 32mb cache hdd, 850watt 12v rails=4x20amp powersupply
Just my two frames' worth.
Profile: Graphic Gorilla
More Information

Actually, the question is does it nose dive with AA. That's the big problem with AA on the HD series, you can see it go from competitive with the high end without AA (like the HD2900XT vs GF8800Ultra) to stuggling to keep up with the low end of the enthusiast parts (like the HD2900XT vs GF8800GTS-320).

This is good, but you know that for many people running at 1920x1200 with AA will matter more than 2500x1600 without AA.

Anywhoo, just wish more than high and very high they had VH with no AA and either VH or H with AA, that would've at least given us an idea about what this segment tends to look for, c'mon 1280x1024 with no AA?.


Message edited by TheGreatGrapeApe on 04-30-2008 at 01:45:06 AM

---------------
You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Profile: old hand
More Information

I agree that is an important test. It seems ATI just keeps wishing the old AA method would just go away. This won't happen, however, until NVidia does DX10.1 too (or gets destroyed by Intel :lol: )


---------------
Gaming: FX-60 @ 2.81GHz (x14, 1.375, 90nm) > A8N-SLI Deluxe > Asus 4850 - 625/1986 > 2GB Corsair XMS 400MHz
2-3-3-6-1T
HTPC/Light Gaming: X2 5400+ 2.8GHz Brisbane > Gigabyte 780G MATX - 900MHz Core > 2GB Corsair XMS2 800MHz
4-4-4-12-2T
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

EXT64 wrote :

I agree that is an important test. It seems ATI just keeps wishing the old AA method would just go away. This won't happen, however, until NVidia does DX10.1 too (or gets destroyed by Intel :lol: )


With that kind of performance, I don't care for aa anymore. The gap is just way too large. It's one gpu core against 2, and look at that bar. What happens when the 4870x2 comes out? :na:


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 X38 chipset motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB 7200rpm 32mb cache hdd, 850watt 12v rails=4x20amp powersupply
Profile: old hand
More Information

OK, I confess. I didn't look at the benchmarks before posting. WOW! I wish for once the hype could be true! I wasn't planning on getting a new card yet, but if this is true, I might grab one of the lower ones (4850 or equivalent).


---------------
Gaming: FX-60 @ 2.81GHz (x14, 1.375, 90nm) > A8N-SLI Deluxe > Asus 4850 - 625/1986 > 2GB Corsair XMS 400MHz
2-3-3-6-1T
HTPC/Light Gaming: X2 5400+ 2.8GHz Brisbane > Gigabyte 780G MATX - 900MHz Core > 2GB Corsair XMS2 800MHz
4-4-4-12-2T
Profile: stranger
More Information

Assuming these are legit, the question now becomes:

How will nVidia respond?

I wonder if the GeForce 99xx series will post even bigger numbers.

Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

bluesguitar007 wrote :

Assuming these are legit, the question now becomes:

 

How will nVidia respond?

 

I wonder if the GeForce 99xx series will post even bigger numbers.


It'll be difficult, considering how high the bar is set.


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 X38 chipset motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB 7200rpm 32mb cache hdd, 850watt 12v rails=4x20amp powersupply
Kitteh iz watchen!!!!
Profile: addict