Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Core 2 Extreme that much different?
 

Core 2 Extreme that much different?

Advanced Search

CPU & Components : yman Homebuilt Systems : geofelt, foxhound009, kad Graphic & Displays : Kraynor and 239 unknown users
Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Core 2 Extreme that much different?
 
Profile: addict
More Information

I am looking to squeeze more juice out of my rather budget ASROCK 4CoreDual SATA2 board - it supports Core 2 Quad Q6700 and a Core 2 Extreme QX6700 - both have identical clock speeds and cache which leaves me with one question.
 
Is there any point in me gettin the Core 2 Extreme version when I can get the same speeds and cache from a Core 2 Quad?

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Core 2 Extreme has their multipliers unlocked, and having a better binned die. Therefore you can overclock QX6700 higher than the non-extreme version.
 
Other than that, those two should be identical.


---------------
Paul Otellini:
"The initial ones are multi-chip, but so what?' You guys are misreading the market if you think people care what's in the package."
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

The Q6700 has a multiplier of 10. That already allows some spectacular overclocking. I think you're better off with the Q6700 and using the rest of your cash for other upgrades.

Ironhide: Why are we fighting to save the humans?
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

aevm wrote :

The Q6700 has a multiplier of 10. That already allows some spectacular overclocking. I think you're better off with the Q6700 and using the rest of your cash for other upgrades.

I agree.
Deppending on your budget and the price of a QX6700 (I assume it costs more than $500) a Q6600/Q6700 with good cooler (XIGMATEK HDT-S1283 for $40) and a good motherboard(GA-P35-DS3R, P5K-E,...) would be way better value and offer better performance when overclocked.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Why waste money on a dated Extreme cpu? Try the cooler, faster Q9300/Q9400.  
 
Btw, Nehalem will be out in months. Worth waiting.
 
-----------------
 
Intel Q9300 3.0GHz
Nvidia 9800GTX  
4GB DDR3 PC16000
64GB SSD
Windows Vista Home / FreeBSD 7.0 + KDE 4
www.everypot.com

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by uutorok on 05-12-2008 at 03:56:31 AM

---------------
Q9300 9800GX2 4GB PC16000 64GB SSD
http://everypot.com/  
Windows Vista Home / FreeBSD 7.0 + KDE 4

 

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

uutorok wrote :

Why waste money on a dated Extreme cpu? Try the cooler, faster Q9300/Q9400.

 

Btw, Nehalem will be out in months. Worth waiting.

 

-----------------

 

Intel Q9300 3.0GHz
Nvidia 9800GTX
4GB DDR3 PC16000
64GB SSD
Windows Vista Home / FreeBSD 7.0 + KDE 4
www.everypot.com


The problem is q9300 use 7.5x multiplier, which is a major difference to q6700's 10x.


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 X38 chipset motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB 7200rpm 32mb cache hdd, 850watt 12v rails=4x20amp powersupply
Profile: addict
More Information

Because that is all my motherboard will support at this moment. This is for the family PC which everyone uses so I want it to be fast but I don't want to spend money stripping it out completely. I am only trying to squeeze as much juice out of it as possible before the top of the line chip is no longer available - the rest of the cash is going towards my rig which will very likely have DDR3 RAM, PCI-E 2.0 and one of the newer Core 2s with 3MB of cache on each core.  
 
As for the Nehalem, since I'm not that knowledgeable of the processor market, what does the Nehalem offer that is worth waiting for?


Message edited by marshahu on 05-12-2008 at 03:46:26 PM
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

Your new rig could be much better if you get DDR2 instead of DDR3 and use the savings to get a great video card or two.
 

Ironhide: Why are we fighting to save the humans?
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

^Agreed. DDR3 offers poor value.
Buy 8GB DDR2 and a nice graphics card if you want to treat yourself.

Profile: member
More Information

Do NOT get a Q9300. Opt for the Q9450 instead. The difference between extreme and non extreme processors in the 6 series is 584 million transistors vs 410 million transistors. In fact when you look at Intels white papers you wonder if the q9300 and q9450 aren't much more than dual cores (also having 410million transistors) split into 4 instead of 2. Personally I spent the money and bought a QX9650 oc at 4GHZ with raid. VERY happy.

Is it wrong to want more Power mawhahaha.
Profile: addict
More Information

P.S Asrock's 4CoreDual-SATA2 mobo doesn't overclock quads. Even struggles to get to 291-294 Mhz FSB on Duals. Think of a new mobo if your planning on overclocking, before the CPU upgrade.

Profile: addict
More Information

this is for the family rig - overclocking is the last thing i want to do - i am aware that this board has a 5% decrease in FSB when using Quad cores - although im unsure as to how severely this will affect my performance.
 
So for the ASrock ill just go for the non extreme processor rite?? I guess the extremes are for overclockers.
 
And the new rig I'll choose the Q9450. uutorok you mention that the Nehalem is worth waiting for? What is so good about it?


Go to:
Add a reply
  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Core 2 Extreme that much different?
 

Google ads