Ad
News

Alienware announces desktop PC with Intel's latest quad-core processor

Published on January 11, 2007

Alienware said it "will" launch Intel's second quad-core desktop processor, the 2.4 GHz Core 2 Quad Q6600, on its Area-51 7500 desktop system. Read more

Intel to launch pricing campaign in Q2 2007

Published on December 21, 2006

Intel will launch a pricing campaign in the second quarter of 2007, with the price for the Core 2 Quad Q6600 processor falling to $530, according to industry sources. Read more

Quad-cores for all, Intel price cut

Published on July 24, 2007

Santa Clara (CA) – Intel’s not-so-secret price cut has been officially announced. The company slashed prices of its entry-level quad-core processors by 50% and also released six new processors in the Core 2 Extreme, Core 2 Quad and Core 2 Duo lines. The Read more

Intel pushes Q6600 quad-core CPU into 95 watt systems

Published on April 30, 2007

Intel has informed its customers that the Core 2 Quad Q6600 desktop quad-core processor as well as the Xeon X3220 and X3210 server quad-core CPUs have been transitioned to a new stepping, which will allow customers to integrate the processors in computer systems using lower power flexible motherboards (FMB). ... Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on November 28, 2008

We tightened the budget on this month’s enthusiast-level system while loosening our belt for the low-cost gamer box by a similar percentage. Today we gauge the effect of these changes on performance and value and compare to last month's machines. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Enthusiast PC

Published on November 27, 2008

On this, the second day of our System Builder Marathon, Don turns down the price tag of his mid-range build looking for a sweet spot just above the $1,000 marker. Let's see what sort of hardware he found for it! Read more

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Published on November 26, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon is all about your feedback to us. We've revamped our entry-level and mid-range PCs with new price points. Let's kick things off with what we think is the best value at a $625 price point! Read more

The State Of The Personal Computer

Published on November 25, 2008

Where were we in 2008 and where are we heading in 2009? In his State of the Personal Computer address, Alan Dang shares his insights as a user of three different platforms--Mac, Windows, and Linux. Read more

 

q6600 go AND b3

Advanced Search

There are 67 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : q6600 go AND b3
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Do the above processors have different TJ maxes? What are they and what temp monitoring program is best for each? Realtemp reports 5 C lower temps than core temp.

TJ Max realtemp =95
TJ Max Coretemp= 100

Which is more likely to be correct? Question

Also when stress testing in prime95 which is the best setting to USe, large or small FFTs?

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

Yes they do have a different Tjmax. Which one do you have, G0? the Tjmax of 95C for the G0 in Real Temp is more likely to be correct, because Unclewebb did testing with an IR thermometer.


Message edited by Zorg on 08-21-2008 at 12:40:15 PM
Profile: stranger
More Information

I have a GO go go! :-) So I will assume the lower temps reported by real temp to be correct?

It's OC'd to 3.0GHz with a arctic freezer pro 7, coolermaster 360 elite case, intake and exhaust 120mm fans. Ambient around 17C core temp says around 36c idle
61 load with realtemp reporting 5c lower.

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

Your ambient (room) temp is 62.6F? That's an icebox. Yes the Real Temp numbers are correct, IMO of course.

What are you using to load the CPU? If you're not using Prime95 small FFTs, then try it.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Okay that was a guess at ambient, I'll get a thermometer and get the real ambient temp.

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

Not a big deal, your temps are good.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Man I'm jealous of all these low ambient temps, I hate the heat.

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

I hope you were kidding. 62.6 was a guess and as cold as a witch's t... uh... never mind.


Message edited by Zorg on 08-21-2008 at 04:28:30 PM
pogs.host.sk
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Maybe he is in polar region thats why the ambient is low. 17c is cool, 15-10c is for refrigerator.


---------------
XFX Geforce 8300
Athlon X2 (2.0ghz)@2.3Ghz
2 GB Kingston 667 RAM @766Mhz
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

Yeah I know, but thanks for clearing that up for me.

Anyone that is in a room with an ambient temp of 62.6F is wearing a jacket and maybe some light driving gloves. :lol:

Profile: stranger
More Information

Hi again, okay I must get a thermometer!! The air temp out side was 14C at the time its 16C at the minute and I am running at 3.2 and have beeb running prime for just over an hour and temps are 63 according to coretemp and 58 to realtemp. I have been reading the realtemp thread on the other forum by unclewebb and it would seem that the b3 is TJ max 100 and the GO is 95 which would mean 58 is the correct number . Although its not definite, but aren't intel supposed to be releasing some more info todsay on TJ etc?

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

You don't need a thermometer, your temps are good. So there is no confusion, ambient temp is the temp in the room where the computer is, not outside.

 

Do you have a link to the post about the B3 Tjmax, I was looking for it recently and couldn't find it.

 

Intel is supposedly releasing the Tjmax for the 45nm chips, but I don't know if they are including the 65nm.


Message edited by Zorg on 08-21-2008 at 09:20:41 PM
Profile: stranger
More Information

Another stupid Q but are the cores temps usually hotter than the cpu temps?

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

Tjunction (core temp) is always less than Tcase. A very good source of information is the Core 2 Quad and Duo Temperature Guide. Give it a read and it will answer your questions about the relationship between the two.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Thanks for that pointer, thats a great guide. Realtemp has changed its ideas on the Q6600 TJ max and the new beta version reports it 100 now.
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/ [...] mpBeta.zip so therefore reports higher core temps but I guess the all important reading is distance to tj max anyway.

I am at 3.2 now at load with tjmax being 100 core temps reported at 62C cpu 64C. I ran prime small ffts for 6 hours without issue would you say thats good enough to say it was stable?

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

What does this new info have for an inpact on the B3 q6600 anyone know?

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information
n°1772244
08-24-2008 at 10:30:52 AM
Hide