Sharp announced the development of its high-contrast ratio in-car LCD applications and highlighted that the contrast ratio of 1500:1 achieves the industry's highest level. Read more
With panel makers pushing 16:9 ratio panels in 2008, Acer has decided to open up all its notebook product lines to be based on the ratio, while other notebook vendors are readying to push at least 14" and 15. Read more
GVision has unveiled a 22" LCD TV at Computex. Read more
Where will Samsung stop? This is the SPD-50P5HD, a 50" TV PDP with a contrast ratio of 10,000:1. It also uses the DNIe (Digital Natural Image Engine) to improve image rendering. The TV will be priced above $7500. Read more
Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more
What do you do with all the data you collect at home? Network attached storage is the solution. We test Maxtor's Shared Storage II and find that it is also suitable for use in small businesses. Read more
Take four gaming laptops. Arm two of them with SLI and make the others Centrino 2-compatible. You're looking at a high-end collection of the latest mobile technology battling it out for benchmark supremacy and your hard-earned dollars. Read more
Storage vendors split the desktop hard drive market into performance, mainstream, and energy-efficient products. We looked at Samsung’s Spinpoint F, the RAID version and the EcoGreen F to discover how a 1,000 GB drive differs from another. Read more
Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums »
Overclocking
»
General Discussions »
1:1 ratio can someone pls explain it to me
| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : 1:1 ratio can someone pls explain it to me
|
|
Profile: journeyman
More Information
|
I understand why 1:1 would be an ideal ratio, but I don't quite understand how it works. Can someone please answer a few qustions? By the way, I'm assuming timings are equal for argument's sake. Thanks a lot!
|
|
Related Product
|
|
Some call me ... Tim?
Profile: enthusiast
More Information
|
Okay, there are several other posts that cover most of this material, so my first suggestion is that you peruse older posts, such as this post.
Message edited by zipz0p on 07-13-2008 at 06:20:52 AM |
|
Profile: journeyman
More Information
|
Thanks. I don't think you've really answered my questions. I've actually read that post and many similar ones. But, I couldn't understand it 100%, that's why I posted. Message edited by zeroyb on 07-13-2008 at 08:51:42 AM |
|
The Official Intel Deep Fryer.
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
I'm still a bit confused about the whole QDR thing....
|
|
I'm proud of myself,because i'm from IRAN
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information
|
I think u answered your question,in some boards like NVIDIA 680i/780i boards u have something called QDR which as u said is the FSBx4.But in some other boards u have the normal FSB (for example if i have a
--------------- Q6600@3.4,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,OCZ 4GB DDR2 800 RAM 4-4-4-15,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA X38,SEAGATE 500GB 7200RPM 32MB,TT V1 CPU Cooler,TT ARMOR SILVER ALUMNIUM With 25cm FAN,OCZ MODXSTREAM 900W,LG 2284F 1680x1050 |
|
Some call me ... Tim?
Profile: enthusiast
More Information
|
My answer to point 2 should answer point 1. To make it more clear: since DDR2-1066 is really just overclocked DDR2-800, when you run the DDR2-1066 modules at DDR2-880 (400MHz FSB 1:1, or something like that), it will behave the same as memory that claims to be DDR2-800. They are the same exact modules, just tested, rated and packaged differently.
Message edited by zipz0p on 07-13-2008 at 09:50:44 AM |
|
Some call me ... Tim?
Profile: enthusiast
More Information
|
Hmm... According to wikipedia (a far more reliable source than I), QDR is the way Intel processors communicate with the memory controller, transferring data on the rise and fall of dual clock signals, which are 90deg. out of phase. So I think the very utmost optimal situation would be QDR memory which would operate then at the same effective speed. I'm not sure if DDR in dual channels offsets this, though... perhaps.
|
|
Profile: addict
More Information
|
to my knowledge there would be no difference in running 1066mhz at 800mhz or 800mhz ram normally. timings and such are on the specifications of ram that you buy. the increments of 667,800, and 1066 are there because of the increments of FSB that intel had increased over the years with its processors. mainly by 66-67mhz in generations...kentsfield = 266... penryn = 333.... take the Q6600 for example, it has a FSB of 266... 266 (fsb) x 4(quad pumped) = 1066 (fsb frequency) ....so in reality, to run 1:1 ratio with the Q6600, u only need 533mhz ram. but most people love to OC the Q6600 to a minimum to 333 FSB. so 333x4 = 1333mhz fsb frequency....so therefore, you would need 1333/2 = 667mhz ram to run it in 1:1 on the new generations of penryns and such, the stock fsb is 333x4 = 1333 fsb freq.... but people usually go to 400fsb or beyond... anything beyond 1600+ would require you to OC the ram, or get ram that are rated higher such as 1066mhz ram. Message edited by AznGuy0028 on 07-13-2008 at 10:21:11 AM --------------- Intel Q9450 @ 3.4ghz ![]() |
|
Profile: journeyman
More Information
|
Great. Thanks for the helpful info guys! |
|
The Official Intel Deep Fryer.
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
|
|
I'm proud of myself,because i'm from IRAN
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information
|
So its not my fault u asked your question bad because supremelaw understood it like me,so type correctly, also be more careful with your talking,i just wanted to help u --------------- Q6600@3.4,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,OCZ 4GB DDR2 800 RAM 4-4-4-15,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA X38,SEAGATE 500GB 7200RPM 32MB,TT V1 CPU Cooler,TT ARMOR SILVER ALUMNIUM With 25cm FAN,OCZ MODXSTREAM 900W,LG 2284F 1680x1050 |
Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums »
Overclocking
»
General Discussions »
1:1 ratio can someone pls explain it to me
