Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Intel Q9300 gaming benchmarks
 

Intel Q9300 gaming benchmarks

Advanced Search

Other : RobD Applications : ijack and 248 unknown users
Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Intel Q9300 gaming benchmarks
 
Profile: newbie
More Information

Hello everyone,

Here's some result of the Intel new quadcore Q9300 (Yorkfield, 45nm):
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/?article_id=628633

Enjoy!

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

my german is rusty
but from what i can tell you have the Q9300 overclocked to 3.5ghz and compared to stock settings for all others - kinda worthless!

now if they overclock all the chips to 3.5ghz that would help!


---------------
http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h138/4rothrocks/WarpedSystemsAnimation-1.jpg
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Nice. Thanks for posting.

Profile: newbie
More Information

dragonsprayer wrote :

my german is rusty
but from what i can tell you have the Q9300 overclocked to 3.5ghz and compared to stock settings for all others - kinda worthless!

now if they overclock all the chips to 3.5ghz that would help!



They also show the result with the stock speed (at 2.5Ghz). Look carefully at the graph...

Profile: old hand
More Information

Quote :

Look carefully at the graph...


AND LEARN SOME GERMAN DAMNIT!!!


Message edited by purplerat on 01-22-2008 at 10:38:19 PM

---------------
GIGABYTE GA-P35-DS4 v2.0
Intel Core2 Q6600 @ 3.3Ghz
4GB OCZ Reaper DDR2 800 @ 915Mhz
EVGA 8800GTS 512MB G92
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Beer...

Profile: stranger
More Information

Google does a good job at translating it. Well, enough to understand :)

Profile: member
More Information

45nm but still a Double cheeseburger design....AMD Phenom is native Quad

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

thunderman wrote :

45nm but still a Double cheeseburger design....AMD Phenom is native Quad



Yeah and how's that working out for them?


---------------
LAPTOP: Sager NP5760|T7200|2gb DDR2-667| 100gb 7200rpm HDD| 512mb 7950GTX|17'' WUXGA

Desktop: Core2 E7200 | Corsair 2gb DDR2-800 | Gigabyte EP35-DS3L | 250gb Seagate Barracuda | HIS x1650pro | Corsair VX550 | Antec 300 case
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

thunderman wrote :

45nm but still a Double cheeseburger design....AMD Phenom is native Quad


Yep... Phenom is native... belongs in its own class below the burger king cheese burgers. It would be more like the whalers since its a nice square shape, not round like the whopper.

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Grimmy wrote :

Yep... Phenom is native... belongs in its own class below the burger king cheese burgers. It would be more like the whalers since its a nice square shape, not round like the whopper.

 

More like a Wendy's burger then. ;)

 

edit: not sure what you meant by "whalers"

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by lostandwan dering on 02-15-2008 at 06:40:01 PM

---------------
LAPTOP: Sager NP5760|T7200|2gb DDR2-667| 100gb 7200rpm HDD| 512mb 7950GTX|17'' WUXGA

Desktop: Core2 E7200 | Corsair 2gb DDR2-800 | Gigabyte EP35-DS3L | 250gb Seagate Barracuda | HIS x1650pro | Corsair VX550 | Antec 300 case
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

thunderman wrote :

45nm but still a Double cheeseburger design....AMD Phenom is buggy and slow even though it's a native Quad



Fixed it for you.

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

lostandwandering wrote :

More like a Wendy's burger then. ;)

edit: not sure what you meant by "whalers"



Its a fish sandwitch, or better known as BK Fish or Whaler back in the old days. :D

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

Grimmy wrote :

Its a fish sandwitch, or better known as BK Fish or Whaler back in the old days. :D



In my terms the C2Q series is like a nice juicy double whopper and the Phenom is a tasteless SOI burger.


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/381014.png
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Well, it shows that the 9300 is nice little quad if you can wind it that tight. Probably not much more OC left since the FSB is already at 466* however and no guarantee that everyone will get that high of FSB. My Q6600 at 3.4 posts 5100+ in the CPU score and it is impressive for everyday use including gaming.

*Edit: Sorry... multiplier is 7.5 and the Yorkies seem to hit a FSB wall between 460-470.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Craxbax on 02-15-2008 at 07:42:10 PM
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Grimmy wrote :

Its a fish sandwitch, or better known as BK Fish or Whaler back in the old days. :D



Ah that fits perfectly then. There's definitely something "phishy" about the Phenom.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Craxbax wrote :

Well, it shows that the 9300 is nice little quad if you can wind it that tight. My Q6600 at 3.4 posts 5100+ in the CPU score and it is impressive for everyday use including gaming. Probably not much more OC left since the FSB is already at 500 however and no guarantee that everyone will get that high of FSB.



Yeah I'm not all that excited about the 9300 since the multiplier is set so low. I plan on sticking with my Q6600 until Nehalem.

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

uguv wrote :

Ah that fits perfectly then. There's definitely something "phishy" about the Phenom.



;) . o O (yep... my thoughts exactly, also in its own class)

Profile: addict
More Information

Looks like about less than 5% increase in most games... not worth the upgrade.


---------------
Antec Nine Hundred, Gigabyte P35-DS3R, Intel Q6600 @ 3.2 Ghz, Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme, eVGA 8800GT 512MB, G-Skill 4GB (2x2GB) DDR2-800 4-4-4-10, Seasonic S12 ATX 650W, Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB SATA, Samsung 22" LCD, Windows XP Pro 64-bit
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

MrsBytch wrote :

It looks pretty disappointing to me, especially overclocked.



Your... disappointed? Well.. shucky darns, I guess you'll be getting a phenom system, right? Or did you want the Q6600 whopper with cheese?