Ad
News

ECS announces entry-level motherboard with Core 2 Quad support

Published on August 10, 2007

Elitegroup Computer Systems (ECS) has announced the entry-level P4M900T-M motherboard which provides support for Intel’s Core 2 Quad processors.The P4M900T-M supports 1066 MHz FSB CPUs including Intel Core 2 Quad processors such as the Q6700 as well as C Read more

Eurocom introduces quad-core mobile workstation

Published on July 31, 2007

Chicago (IL) – Eurocom has begun offering its heavy-weight Phantom mobile workstations with Intel’s Core 2 Quad processors. If performance is the priority in a mobile computer, then there is a new option from Eurocom. The company’s D900C Phantom-X workst Read more

Quad-core Xeon E5335 makes early debut

Published on December 13, 2006

Media reports are in that Intel is ready to release a new quad-core processor, marking yet another new product for Intel this year. The Xeon E5335, which was originally scheduled for a February 2007 release, takes its position as the fifth quad-core processor since Intel first released the Kentsfield/Clovertown cores earlier this autumn. Read more

AMD Introduces New Phenom Flagship Processor

Published on July 01, 2008

Sunnyvale (CA) - AMD is kicking off the critical third quarter of 2008 with three new quad-core processors - two low-power models and a new high-end version for enthusiast PCs. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

Part 4: Avivo HD Vs. PureVideo HD

Published on September 29, 2008

The 780G chipset/Radeon HD 3200 and the MCP78S chipset/GeForce 8200 provide the first integrated graphics solutions that can accelerate Blu-ray playback. We dig deep into how well they work with high quality Blu-ray 1080p video playback. Read more

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more

Maxtor's Shared Storage Does NAS At Home

Published on September 25, 2008

What do you do with all the data you collect at home? Network attached storage is the solution. We test Maxtor's Shared Storage II and find that it is also suitable for use in small businesses. Read more

SLI & Centrino 2: Gaming Laptops Battle

Published on September 24, 2008

Take four gaming laptops. Arm two of them with SLI and make the others Centrino 2-compatible. You're looking at a high-end collection of the latest mobile technology battling it out for benchmark supremacy and your hard-earned dollars. Read more

  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » overclcoking q6700
 

overclcoking q6700

Advanced Search

There are 278 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : overclcoking q6700
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hi there

I'm new to overlcokcing and was wondering if anyone can give me settings to be able to get 3.6ghz or 4.0ghz on the following system spec


Motherboard Gigabyte ep35-ds3r
Processor Q6700
Ram 2 x 2gb Geil pc6400 800mhz
Gpu xfx 9600gt
Cooling Thermaltake Bigwater 745
Psu 700watt

as you can see cooling shouldnt be a problem since im running water cooling but everytime i try hit 3.6ghz i get the blue screen of death so any input would be much appreciated, also if there is anything that i would need to change on the system advice would be appreciated once again

Regards

Michael

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Noob? Currently on Sabbatical!
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Sure, how about running either real temp, or Core Temp, and listing the VID of your processor.

 


Box or OEM??

 


--Lupi


Message edited by Lupiron on 07-05-2008 at 02:11:03 AM
Profile: stranger
More Information

vid according to real temp is 1.3250 and box


Message edited by newkid on 07-05-2008 at 02:20:36 AM
Noob? Currently on Sabbatical!
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Okay, that is the worse possible VID. Meaning its new. Intel has been being very mean with releasing any good ones.

I have a 1.2250 and a 1.2375 and those are the 4.0 chips. (without needing more than 1.55 volts.)

You chip may or may not get 3.8Ghz at that.

You have a kit water set up. Time to check its performance, let me review my tests on a 1.3250 Q6700... Gotta find the pic...

What is your Bios revision? f12?

We need to test a few things. VDrop and droop.

Stay at stock, and hit the Bios, disable speed step, and anything like EIST!

Set the VCore manually to 1.3250

And re boot to windows. Then use CPUz and look at the Core Voltage section. List that here, please?

That reflects VDrop. The initial drop from in bios, to idle windows.

Now run Prime 95 small ffts test on all 4 cores and after 1 minute, list the now lower Core Voltage listed in CPUz, as well as your current temps with core temp and real temp. (Or just the one, if thats all you have for now.)

That will show us your VDroop. The drop from windows idle, to loaded on small ffts, all cores.

List that junk here, and then we will get onward!

--lupi

Noob? Currently on Sabbatical!
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Wow, guess I didnt know what I was doing when I got the pics! LOL, just looked at a q6600 @ 3.6 with 1.440 Volts, and the Q6700 was at 1.47, lol!

But I was a newb back then, for real. Only been over clocking for like maybe 6 months.

Hehehehe

Profile: stranger
More Information

Lupiron wrote :

Okay, that is the worse possible VID. Meaning its new. Intel has been being very mean with releasing any good ones.

I have a 1.2250 and a 1.2375 and those are the 4.0 chips. (without needing more than 1.55 volts.)

You chip may or may not get 3.8Ghz at that.

You have a kit water set up. Time to check its performance, let me review my tests on a 1.3250 Q6700... Gotta find the pic...

What is your Bios revision? f12? f2

We need to test a few things. VDrop and droop.

Stay at stock, and hit the Bios, disable speed step, and anything like EIST!

Set the VCore manually to 1.3250

And re boot to windows. Then use CPUz and look at the Core Voltage section. List that here, please? 1.280v

That reflects VDrop. The initial drop from in bios, to idle windows.

Now run Prime 95 small ffts test on all 4 cores and after 1 minute, list the now lower Core Voltage listed in CPUz, as well as your current temps with core temp and real temp. (Or just the one, if thats all you have for now.) 1.232v temps on real temp under load are 45 45 42 43

That will show us your VDroop. The drop from windows idle, to loaded on small ffts, all cores.

List that junk here, and then we will get onward!

--lupi


Noob? Currently on Sabbatical!
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Kewl, fist step, update your Bios! It's a new box board you got as well? Can you look at the box and list the revision number?

Gotta hunt down that Bios site again. Just helped someone else with a brand new one. f2 is initial release bios. The one before people find the flaws!

There ate 11 updates already out. You want version f12.

Lemme find it...

Got AIM?

--Lupi

Profile: stranger
More Information

that is the most up to date bios for my board other than the 2 beta versions that are on the gigabyte site

http://www.giga-byte.com/Support/M [...] uctID=2743

Only have msn

Michael

Noob? Currently on Sabbatical!
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Gah, different board!


Message edited by Lupiron on 07-05-2008 at 02:48:26 AM
Profile: stranger
More Information

meant to add revision is 2.1

Noob? Currently on Sabbatical!
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Should be about the same anyways. It just has that added epu thingie. I wonder if you can disable it.

My MSN LordLupiron@live.whatever

Profile: stranger
More Information

k added but u seem to be offline, whats the best settings im looking at?

Noob? Currently on Sabbatical!
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Oh, you can easily get 3.6, prolly 3.7. I like to keep within the stock voltages. 1.500 or lower, but you can always get more outside those!

Whatever=.net I think. Maybe.com. whatever Live.xxx is.

Profile: stranger
More Information

heres a screenshot running prime95 on 400x8

 

http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/5572/run8x400ka5.th.jpg

 

any reason when i try the multiplyer on 9 or 10 i get the blue screen of death?

 

also my voltages are running on auto in bios just now while im testing

 

Michael


Message edited by newkid on 07-05-2008 at 03:23:07 AM
Noob? Currently on Sabbatical!
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information
n°1764927
07-05-2008 at 03:32:03 AM