Ad
News

Intel to launch Core 2 Duo E7000 in Q2

Published on January 11, 2008

Intel is apparently set to begin transition the Core 2 Duo E4000 series with the new E700 series, which is based on the 45 nm Wolfdale core. Read more

Sony Debuts Three All-In-One Desktop PCs With Blu-ray

Published on September 04, 2008

The Sony VAIO JS, LV and RT models were unveiled at CEDIA Wednesday, featuring Blu-ray drives and fashionable all-in-one desktop designs Read more

Intel Releases New Midrange Chips

Published on August 12, 2008

Intel has released several new midrange processors all based on its 45nm process technology from both the Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad lines. Vendors of gaming PCs are expected to manufacture new systems based on these processors shortly. At the head of th Read more

Soda Attack Victim Says YouTube Apology Not Enough

Published on June 11, 2008

New York (NY) - Yesterday we brought you the Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

Part 4: Avivo HD Vs. PureVideo HD

Published on September 29, 2008

The 780G chipset/Radeon HD 3200 and the MCP78S chipset/GeForce 8200 provide the first integrated graphics solutions that can accelerate Blu-ray playback. We dig deep into how well they work with high quality Blu-ray 1080p video playback. Read more

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more

Maxtor's Shared Storage Does NAS At Home

Published on September 25, 2008

What do you do with all the data you collect at home? Network attached storage is the solution. We test Maxtor's Shared Storage II and find that it is also suitable for use in small businesses. Read more

SLI & Centrino 2: Gaming Laptops Battle

Published on September 24, 2008

Take four gaming laptops. Arm two of them with SLI and make the others Centrino 2-compatible. You're looking at a high-end collection of the latest mobile technology battling it out for benchmark supremacy and your hard-earned dollars. Read more

  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » E7200 w/ Xigmatek Temps
 

E7200 w/ Xigmatek Temps

Advanced Search

There are 392 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : E7200 w/ Xigmatek Temps
 
Profile: newbie
More Information

Hey guys I recently put together my budget system and just put it together last night. I have a E7200 with a Xigmatek963, The CPU is currently OC'd to 3.8 at 9.5X400 with a 1.35Vcore. My core temps seem really high being at 50c idle and 70c under Load with Prime95. after some google searching it seems like most everyone else is getting temps 10-15c lower them me at load and idle so I am wonder what is up...'

I am using HWMonitor to record temps along with CPUZ for general information. Is the Xigmatek 968 that much worse then the 1283? I used AS5 on the HSF and applied the long bead as according to the Arctic website and even applied another bead on each side of it for good measure.

I am currently at school but when I get home I will post SS's of HWM and CPUZ showing you guys anything I might of forgot to mention but in the mean time, do these temps seem right for my setup? I didnt think my load temps were going to go over 60c

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

I would use realtemp instead of hardware monitor to montior temps.

Profile: newbie
More Information

my voltage is 1.35 in the bios but cpuz reports it at 1.32 If ic ant lower the temp i will try lowering the vcore by .1 and running prime 95 till it becomes unstable then brining it back up to the last stable vcore but i doubt at 3.8 it will go much under 1.35 and 1.32 after vdroop

when I get home i will check temps with realtemp and try reseating with only the one bead of AS5 in the middle of the IFS and report back

Profile: newbie
More Information

Ok guys I got realtemp and ran prime95 for just a couple of mintues to see what it would do and the difference between HWMonitor and RealTemp is 10C RealTemp showing 10c cooler at load and idle over HWMonitor. Not I am just not sure what to believe my real temps are at how accurate can these be when they are so far off of each other?

Also In my BIOS my VCore for my CPU is set at 1.35 and CPUZ reports it as 1.32 at Idle and as low as 1.304 while running Prime95. Is this acceptable or is this telling me my PSU just isnt up to par?


http://img365.imageshack.us/img365/3124/cputestingan6.jpg

Profile: newbie
More Information

I tried lowering the voltage down from 1.35 to 1.325 and it was instantly unstable even under light loads. But i seem to think the reason for the temp increase on HWMonitor has to do with a Tjmax set to 105 instead of 95 giving the temps and inaccurate increase of 10c. so all is well

HAPPY OVERCLOCKING!

Profile: addict

I am at 3.8G, 400Mhz, 1.33V. Its been 7 weeks and stable. Any cpuv under 1.32 was unstable. CPUz shows ~1.3v, but Easytune and the bios shows 1.33v. My temps are 33c idle and 53c load. The pic below i had Prime95 runnin in the background and my temp was only 40c in easytune.

http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d68/50_BMG/specs.jpg


Message edited by 50bmg on 07-07-2008 at 05:38:11 PM

---------------
gigabyte GA-EX38-DS4|Intel C2D e7200 at 3.8GHz| 2X Visiontek ATI 3870 800-2340 512M CCC 8.7|4G Patriot PC6400 DDR2 800MHz 5-5-5-12|500G Seagate SATA II 7200.11 HD|Seagate 250G SATA HD|Golden Orb 2|3x80mm Ultra case fans|DVD RW|CD-ROM|BFG Tech 800w| Win XP

  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » E7200 w/ Xigmatek Temps

Go to:
 

Google ads