Is This Low For A Raid-0 Benchmark????

News

LSI Debuts PCI RAID Storage Adapter

Published on September 19, 2003

LSI Logic Corp. Read more

Lacie announces 5 TB SATA RAID

Published on August 15, 2007

Lacie is offering a 5-disk RAID with a capacity of 5 TB (5 x 1 TB). The "S2S" uses a 3 Gb/s SATA interface and is promised to achieve burst data transfer rates of more than 200 MB/s. Lacie said that up to four S2S boxes can be connected via an included e Read more

NEC selects Promise's Serial ATA RAID 5 solution for server systems

Published on August 14, 2003

Promise Technology, the originator and leading supplier of ATA/SATA RAID solutions, on August 13 announced that NEC has selected its Serial ATA (SATA) RAID 5 solution for use in server systems. Read more

3ware Launches Second Generation Performance-Driven Serial ATA RAID

Published on July 15, 2003

3ware Inc., a leading provider of high-capacity, switched Serial ATA (SATA) RAID storage solutions, today announced the availability of its second generation SATA RAID controllers - the Escalade(tm) 8506 series, and sixth generation Parallel RAID controllers - the Escalade 7506 series. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

G31 And E7200: The Real Low-Power Story

Published on October 10, 2008

While Intel and VIA are battling for the low-power market, an optimized desktop motherboard and an efficient processor can already take your idle power down to almost 30 W, while still providing solid performance. We put Intel's G31 chipset to the task. Read more

Three High-End Gaming Systems Compared

Published on October 09, 2008

Gaming enthusiasts always look for an edge, but that edge usually comes at a cost--time or money. We compare three systems from HP, Falcon NW, and Vigor aimed at gamers with more money than time. Read more

Shuttle's X27: Can Atom Handle Vista?

Published on October 08, 2008

In the horsepower race between Intel’s and AMD’s quad-core chips, the Atom processor is an everyday hybrid. Shuttle took it and created a pint-sized small for factor box. Is it powerful enough to be your daily-use desktop, though? Read more

Do New Drivers Really Boost Performance?

Published on October 07, 2008

How much extra performance can you get from a simple graphics driver update? And what sort of gaming gains can you expect from a high-end graphics card when you overclock your CPU? Read more

All the Reviews & Articles

Relatives contents

Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Overclocking » Motherboards » Is This Low For A Raid-0 Benchmark????

Is This Low For A Raid-0 Benchmark????

Advanced Search

There are 283 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here

Show comments: By default All Good ratings Poor ratings

Word : Username : Filter :
Bottom
Author	Thread : Is This Low For A Raid-0 Benchmark????

JLewis187

Profile: member

More Information

07-02-2008 at 11:31:20 PM

hi Guys.. Ive been running a Western Digital RAPTOR X for a while and I found out about Raid-0.. So I took a 7200RPM Western Digital Sata and put it into a Raid-0 Setup.

So Its a 10K RPM Raptor Drive with a 7200RPM Cavier

I remember testing the 10k raptor by itself and It was hitting a maximum of 85.

Message edited by JLewis187 on 07-02-2008 at 11:32:01 PM

Related Product

cjl

Rocket Scientist
Profile: nimble knuckle

More Information

07-02-2008 at 11:46:13 PM

Hide

I wouldn't do that. Typically, for RAID 0, you want both drives to be the same. In your case, the raptor alone would be faster in most apps, as the caviar will limit it in access time.

Message edited by cjl on 07-02-2008 at 11:47:05 PM

JLewis187

Profile: member

More Information

07-02-2008 at 11:50:05 PM

Hide

ya but the Burst is wayyyyy higher then what the raptor X would be, and the maximum is 120 instead of 85.

Go to:

Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Overclocking » Motherboards » Is This Low For A Raid-0 Benchmark????

Page generated in 1.577 seconds

Google ads