Ad
News

EU to review Google bid for DoubleClick

Published on September 24, 2007

European Union regulators will decide before November whether to clear Google’s $3.1 billion takeover bid for online ad tracker DoubleClick or study the issue further. The European Commission on Monday set an initial review deadline of Oct. 26. Regulator ... Read more

Ballmer: Vista launch could slip further

Published on May 25, 2006

The launch of the consumer version of Windows Vista, Microsoft's new operating system, could be pushed back past the stated January launch date, Microsoft chief executive officer Steve Ballmer said today. Read more

Low-density SDRAM prices to pick up further as Samsung ends production

Published on July 22, 2005

According to its clients, Samsung Electronics will stop producing 16Mbit SDRAM from August, which should further push up SDRAM prices amid ramping consumer electronics demand. Read more

English physicists develop 1 TByte storage discs

Published on September 27, 2004

Physicists at Imperial College London are developing a new optical disc with up to one TeraByte storage capacity. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

G31 And E7200: The Real Low-Power Story

Published on October 10, 2008

While Intel and VIA are battling for the low-power market, an optimized desktop motherboard and an efficient processor can already take your idle power down to almost 30 W, while still providing solid performance. We put Intel's G31 chipset to the task. Read more

Three High-End Gaming Systems Compared

Published on October 09, 2008

Gaming enthusiasts always look for an edge, but that edge usually comes at a cost--time or money. We compare three systems from HP, Falcon NW, and Vigor aimed at gamers with more money than time. Read more

Shuttle's X27: Can Atom Handle Vista?

Published on October 08, 2008

In the horsepower race between Intel’s and AMD’s quad-core chips, the Atom processor is an everyday hybrid. Shuttle took it and created a pint-sized small for factor box. Is it powerful enough to be your daily-use desktop, though? Read more

Do New Drivers Really Boost Performance?

Published on October 07, 2008

How much extra performance can you get from a simple graphics driver update? And what sort of gaming gains can you expect from a high-end graphics card when you overclock your CPU? Read more

  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Could I go further?
 

Could I go further?

Advanced Search

There are 321 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Could I go further?
 
Profile: member
More Information

My Build:

Processor: Q6600 G0
Motherboard: GA-P35-DS3L
Memory: 2GB GeIL Ultra PC2-6400C4
CPU Cooler: Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro

Right. I have the processor currently running at 3.00GHz (333x9) with the stock VID of 1.2125v. The temperatures in Prime95 at LOAD are in the mid 40s never exceeding 50. Is this good or bad? Also, is there room for more OC'ing? Keeping in mind I plan on using the processor for a good 3 years what temperatures should I not exceed?

Thanks,
Maroc. :hello:

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Master-de-bater
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Are you using Coretemp or Realtemp to read your temps? If not, go grab one of them now.

If 50C is your Coretemp, then I'd say you can do 3.4GHz, or even higher.


---------------
"Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
Profile: member
More Information

Evilonigiri wrote :

Are you using Coretemp or Realtemp to read your temps? If not, go grab one of them now.

If 50C is your Coretemp, then I'd say you can do 3.4GHz, or even higher.



I'm using CoreTemp mate. Oh and when you say I can do 3.4, would that be a safe overclock I can run 24/7 for 3 years +?

Master-de-bater
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Maroc wrote :

I'm using CoreTemp mate. Oh and when you say I can do 3.4, would that be a safe overclock I can run 24/7 for 3 years +?


As long as you keep your core temp below 65C under load and keep your voltage under 1.5V, I would expect at least 3 years from the system.

You know, that's an amazing temperature you got with that kind of cooler. You sure you are doing the Prime95 small FFT test? That test will make your cpu real hot.


---------------
"Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
Profile: member
More Information

Oops, i wasn't using small FFT. I've tried it now and the core temps are now between 52 and 59 never exceeding 59 at load. With these kind of temps at 3GHz I'm wondering if it's safe to go further.

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

you have another 20C at core to go. no OC CPU have reported fail due to OC. so dont worry.as long as the load temp dont exceed 70C under load its all fine.

Profile: member
More Information

So far I've not needed to increase the CPUs VCore, will I have to now? And by what increments?

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

yeah you will have to now. once your mobo reach the limit you will have to increase other voltage as well such as NB and VTT(last line).

Profile: member
More Information

By how much should I increase each voltage for 3.4GHz?

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

i dont know how your mobo or cpu will react to it. but you should always up notch by notch untill you pass small ffts prime for i would say 10 hours after i see so many failed after 8 hours.

Profile: member
More Information

Will the jump in speed be noticeable going from 3 to 3.4GHz?

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

yes it will. but anything above 3.6 you cant really put it into use in real life.

Profile: member
More Information

Oh ok, I'll go for 3.4 then. I just don't know what to do when it comes to voltages.
So far, I haven't changed the voltages from my stock VID of 1.2125v which has got me to 3GHz.

 

Update: I've OC'ed further, now I'm running it @ 3.2GHz (400x8) STILL at stock voltages with no sign of trouble.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Maroc on 06-22-2008 at 04:15:45 AM
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

Maroc wrote :

Oh ok, I'll go for 3.4 then. I just don't know what to do when it comes to voltages.
So far, I haven't changed the voltages from my stock VID of 1.2125v which has got me to 3GHz.

 

Update: I've OC'ed further, now I'm running it @ 3.2GHz (400x8) STILL at stock voltages with no sign of trouble.

That's very high for stock voltage. How long did you test in prime95?


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 X38 chipset motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB 7200rpm 32mb cache hdd, 850watt 12v rails=4x20amp powersupply
Profile: member
More Information

dagger wrote :

That's very high for stock voltage. How long did you test in prime95?



Like 2 hours without errors. But I still believe it's 100% stable as i kept my pc on over night downloading/folding. :whistle:

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information