This is Odd, which is reliable.

News

Nvidia has canned NV48

Published on December 02, 2004

ATI's Radeon X850XT PE is the last speed refresh that we will see this winter. Read more

Sun to put x86, faster SPARCs in blades

Published on May 10, 2002

Sun is looking to make blades based on x86-compatible processors in addition to faster embedded when the servers launch later this year, Andrew Orlowski writes. Read more

Gigabyte launches Xeon servers

Published on June 04, 2002

Demand in the server market is growing sharply but opportunity for market entry is shrinking, making speed-to-market crucial. Read more

AMD readies price cuts, new chips

Published on December 16, 2004

Reliable sources said that AMD will respond to pricing by Intel by dropping prices, dropping some chips and introducing some new Opterons on February the 14th next. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

Reality Check: 3D Graphics Take On Hollywood

Published on October 22, 2008

How close do PC graphics and effects get to the real world? Tom's Hardware takes a look and shows you the progress that’s been made so far, along with the tricks of the trade used by game developers. Read more

Event: Gigabyte's Global Overclocking Finals

Published on October 21, 2008

Our team from Tom's Hardware CN had the pleasure of attending the finals for Gigabyte's global overclocking competition and sent us back plenty of pictures, plus a detailed report. Read more

External Storage: Terabyte Drives Compared

Published on October 20, 2008

These external hard drives are all designed to offer 1 TB of storage, but the bundles, performance, and power consumption reveal significant differentiators. A clear winner emerges. Read more

PSU Roundup: Performance, Price, Efficiency

Published on October 17, 2008

Good performance, high efficiency and low price: It’s not easing choosing a power supply that offers all three of these features. Tom’s Hardware tests mainstream power supplies of up to 700 watts to determine which will meet your needs best. Read more

All the Reviews & Articles

Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » This is Odd, which is reliable.

This is Odd, which is reliable.

Advanced Search

There are 371 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here

Word : Username : Filter :
Bottom
Author	Thread : This is Odd, which is reliable.

Nix725

Profile: stranger

More Information

06-09-2008 at 02:48:37 AM

Which one should I believe.

Related Product

Nix725

Profile: stranger

More Information

06-09-2008 at 03:01:31 AM

Hide

This is at full load BTW if you did not notice.

Yoosty

Profile: enthusiast

More Information

06-09-2008 at 04:58:14 AM

Hide

Real Temp is for Intel processors only, so that would be the one I would go by.

Shadowthor

Profile: nimble knuckle

More Information

06-09-2008 at 05:05:57 AM

Hide

I would go with real temp, it displays temps correctly for 45nm, plus you can check if the sensors are sticky or not.

Mondoman

Profile: Forum Veteran

More Information

06-09-2008 at 08:05:43 AM

Hide

The number the CPU supplies is the temp offset from Tmax; the different programs just use different values for Tmax and/or different scaling factors. Near Tmax (within 20-30 degrees), the value should be pretty accurate, but it gets more and more off as the temp drops below that. real temp tries to correct for this.

---------------
e2160@3GHz: OCing my way to Ubuntuland!

Nix725

Profile: stranger

More Information

06-09-2008 at 11:39:08 AM

Hide

Thanks all! I am glad that RealTemp is correct. Was not liking the 61c from core temp at all.

Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » This is Odd, which is reliable.

Go to:

Page generated in 0.701 seconds

Google ads