Ad
News

Intel quad-core Kentsfield to be named Core 2 Quadro

Published on September 19, 2006

Intel is expected by the end of this month to officially name its Kentsfield quad-core desktop processor as the "Core 2 Quadro," with the first model to be an Extreme version, the Core 2 Extreme QX6700, which will be available starting in mid-November, according to sources at leading Taiwan motherboard makers. Read more

Young Adults Willing To Pay For Music - Survey

Published on June 17, 2008

Chicago (IL) - The British Music Rights published a new study on digital music usage trends that sheds new light on piracy issues. Read more

Intel to introduce DDR3 memory platform in 2007

Published on January 26, 2006

Even with first DDR3 memory modules already being taped, DDR2 is going to stay with for some time, industry sources suggested today. The information we received is in line with what we have heard from memory manufacturers that the transition from DDR2 to DDR3 will happen in a much more conservative way than what we have seen with DDR and DDR2. Read more

Gigabyte launches quad SLI-ready gaming platform

Published on January 16, 2007

Gigabyte United, a joint-venture of Gigabyte Technology and Asustek Computer, has launched its GA-N680SLI-DQ6 high-end gaming platform, featuring the Nvidia nForce 680i SLI MCP chipset, supporting Intel Core 2 Extreme Quad-Core processors, and delivering what the company calls Gigabyte 6-Quad technologies. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

Tom's SBM: The $1,500 Mainstream PC

Published on October 29, 2008

We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more

System Builder Marathon: The $4,500 Super PC

Published on October 28, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon spreads the system prices out even further to $4,500, $1,500, and $500. Is today’s $4,500 system really worth three times as much as an upper-mainstream performance machine? Read more

Can Your Old Athlon 64 Still Game?

Published on October 24, 2008

We'd all love to upgrade every time a new piece of gaming hardware drops, but that's an expensive proposition. You think your Athlon 64 system is fairly quick--any chance a simple graphics upgrade can bring it up speed? We're aiming to find out. Read more

Benchmarking With Intel's NAS Toolkit

Published on October 23, 2008

We've been publishing our networked storage stories using Intel's NAS Performance tool kit as our primary benchmark. But before we went any further, we thought we'd introduce the software package and its individual components. Read more

  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Motherboards & Memory » Memory » ddr2 vs. ddr3 with very high FSB quad core system
 

ddr2 vs. ddr3 with very high FSB quad core system

Advanced Search

There are 337 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : ddr2 vs. ddr3 with very high FSB quad core system
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hi everyone,

I am planning to build a new OC'd system with Intel's upcoming Q9450 quad processor. Due to its 8x multiplier I am anticipating on running a FSB of somewhere in the 480-500 mHz range, which seems feasible based on everything I've read so long as I can get a motherboard capable of that throughput.

My question is this: Is high speed DDR2 (such as 1066 to 1200) capable of this while being stable, and in a system which is for the most part always on? Or is this maxing out that technology and I would be better off going with DDR3-1333?

Additional RAM overclocking is not really a want of mine, though if there was headroom I would probably bump things up slightly (I'm guessing the DDR3 would be the only choice if I were to also OC the RAM at these speeds?). I'm also not wanting to run liquid cooling or any sort of major cooling apparatus apart from fans blowing over them.

I plan on running Vista x64 and do a lot of video production, so the DDR2 is appealing for getting 2GB sticks without breaking the bank. I'm planning to buy 2 sticks with my build and 2 additional sticks down the line.

So what are your thoughts? Thanks in advance for your help.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

BAM!
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

I would stick with DDR2 highend (1066 or 1200 as you suggest) these speeds are obviously guarenteed by the manufacturer and will be stable. 1200mhz part will give you 600mhz FSB with 1:1 ratio which i believe is more than enough to OC the Q9450. DDR2 is still cheaper at that speed and with better timings.

EDIT: not to mention the extra price of DDR3 motherboards.


Message edited by chookman on 01-23-2008 at 03:23:49 AM

---------------
"This thread made me strap on my lolerskates and head for my roflcopter."
BOOBIES!
Profile: member
More Information

Motherboards don't reach 600FSB without extreme settings. 500FSB is feasible. Go with a 2x2GB stick from G.Skill that OC's to 1000 easily and run it 1:1. I've got a Q6600, Abit IX38, and 4x1GB DDR2-800 OCZ Ati Certified. I've gotten 3.33GHz 1900FSB DDR2-950 stable, and 3.6GHz 1800FSB DDR2-900 stable. Going to go home tonight and get 2000FSB stable (my ram reaches 1050 so...). I wouldn't get DDR3 till it reaches no more than 100$ per 2GB. Wouldn't necessarily use it till the FSB limits get higher either. Better to go with DDR2.


---------------
Latest Rig:
Q6600 OC 3.33 || Abit IX38 OC 1900 || 4x1GB DDR2-800 OC 950 OCZ Ati Cert || 2x2900Pro OC 800/1700 || ABS Tagan ITZ 800w 20A 6 rails || 1TB HD Space || 21" CRT for 2048x1536 resolutions. Yummy. || XClio A380-PLUS: 2x250mm fan + 1x360mm fan
Profile: member
More Information

Stick with DDR2 and a P35 board. They play very well together. Crucial ballistix tracers PC8500 are excellent overclockers. Im running them at 1064 with 4-4-4-12 2.3v and its prime stable for over 8hrs.


---------------
Q6600 G0 @ 3.4 8x425 1.362v, Asus P5k Premium, 4x1GB Ballistix Tracer @1020 4-4-4-12, XFX 8800GTX, 2x Seagate HDD RAID0, Antec Trio 650W, Antec 900 case, Vista x64 Ultimate. Water cooled.
Profile: stranger
More Information

Thanks for the input everyone. I think I'm going to go with that G.Skill DDR2 since they have 2GB sticks. I'm also pretty sure I'll be going X38 instead of P35 due to the higher stock FSB, which I'm assuming should be more reliable at 500mHz. That is unless the P45/X48 chips come out before I'm actually building.


  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Motherboards & Memory » Memory » ddr2 vs. ddr3 with very high FSB quad core system

Go to:
 

Google ads