Ad
News

Intel seeks fix for `Camino' errors

Published on September 28, 1999

Intel says it is working on a fix for memory errors seen in tests of certain system configurations with the `Camino' 820 chipset. Read more

VIA introduces PC133 chipset

Published on July 20, 1999

VIA Technologies says it has introduced the first chipset to support the emerging PC133 standard. Read more

OCZ announces new DDR400/600 memory

Published on July 17, 2005

OCZ said it has added the PC-4800 Platinum Elite Edition (EE) to its memory lineup. Read more

Intel stages major P3 fest

Published on October 26, 1999

Intel has introduced nine new Pentium III chips - ranging from 500MHz to a top-end of 733MHz. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

Radeon HD 4870 X2: Four Cards Compared

Published on November 19, 2008

Not only do we have four super-fast Radeon HD 4870 X2s to test, but also a list of 31 other graphics configurations including CrossFire and SLI setups. If you're in the market for AMD's fastest card available, you'll want to see this. Read more

Synology's DS408 Reviewed: Fast NAS For Pros

Published on November 18, 2008

Does a NAS device with high data transfer rate and a Web interface that is easy to configure actually exist? Synology shows how it should be done. But the enclosure is not without its faults, either. Read more

The Hardware Behind Overdrive

Published on November 18, 2008

Our worldwide overclocking championship has begun and we wanted to introduce you to the everyday components our teams will be tweaking to supersonic speeds in a bid for a shot at $5,000. Read more

Team USA Emerges in Round One of Overdrive

Published on November 17, 2008

After a long weekend of intense benchmarking with nearly 1,300 liters of liquid nitrogen, one team emerged victorious. They’re on their way to Paris to represent the US against four other international teams. Show them some support! Read more

Relatives contents
  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » 100Mhz or RAM timings?
 

100Mhz or RAM timings?

Advanced Search

There are 372 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : 100Mhz or RAM timings?
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hey everyone.

I'm a little new to over clocking and don't do much of it but I'm wondering are a couple higher ram timings worth an extra ~100Mhz out of a CPU? I'm running an AMD Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester socket 939 - i know, old these days) @ 2.29 ~ 2.3Ghz solid(with RAM timings now at 3-3-3-6 @ ~2.7V) from the original stock speed of 2.0Ghz. Originally my RAM timing at stock speeds are 2.5-3-3-6 @ ~2.6V. However when I bump the core frequency up over 229 in the BIOS it automatically sets my ram timings up a couple notches...I can't recall the exact numbers right now but they're something like 4-4-7-8(?). I know those aren't exactly right but I believe it reads something like that. Anyway, would it be worth it to try to get it up to 2.4Ghz but sacrifice RAM timings? I do a little gaming - not too much though. Your comments and/or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

---------------------------------------------
Mobo: Epox 9npa+ultra nvida nForce 4
Memory: 2x1GB(2GB) G.Skill PC3200 DDR @ 429FSB

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

May the force be with you!
Profile: member
More Information

for only about 100Mhz of cpu speed, i don't think it's worth loosening up the ram timings. you won't see a noticeable gain in performance anyhow. IMO, keep the tighter timings at your current clock speed


---------------
If fate really does exist, she hates my guys....
The Threadkiller
Profile: addict
More Information

The way I do mine is I change the RAM settings at stock from 'Auto' to "User Define' This gives me the stock timings locked in.

Im not sure how much your RAM will take in terms of OC, but if there the same G.Skill sticks I have, your pretty close to the ceiling at DDR429.


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/436956.png
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/368892.png
Profile: stranger
More Information

Thanks for the information guys. I think I'm gonna keep it at these settings as suggested. I found where I can adjust each individual timing in the BIOS and could probably get a little more out of it but I really don't feel comfortable messing around with them too much right now.

Quote :

Im not sure how much your RAM will take in terms of OC, but if there the same G.Skill sticks I have, your pretty close to the ceiling at DDR429.



These are the G.Skill sticks I have and you're probably right about almost hitting the ceiling there...at least without a bunch of modifications and adjustments to the timing and voltage settings.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Does lowering the multiplier on HyperTransport have anything to do with ram timings?

So I've upgraded to my processor since it was only $39.99 off newegg and I knew I would at least get near 2.8GHz our of it instead of it's stock 2.4GHz. Anyway, I'm over clocking an AMD Athlon 64 4000+ from 2.4Ghz to approximately 2.750Ghz...with a a Hypertransport speed of 1145GHz - all of which seems stable thus far under Prime 95 (~2 hour test). I'm doing this by just setting the core frequency of the CPU to 229x12 instead of 200x12. However, I was wondering if by lower the HT multiplier so that it stays closer to the standard 1000Mhz mark if that would allow me to get better(lower) RAM timings at a higher CPU frequency? Example: (HT)4x250(CPU frequency) which would put the CPU at 3.0Ghz 12x250. Now I realize that I most likely couldn't get that or even near that with this memory but I would just like to know if a lower HT multiplier would result in better ram timings while bumping up CPU core freq. Hopefully that is clear. Any comments or input is appreciated. Thanks.


Message edited by Vortec on 06-03-2008 at 06:26:15 AM

  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » 100Mhz or RAM timings?

Go to:
 

Google ads