Ad
News

Realtek wireless USB PHY transceiver ASP to halve by 2007

Published on July 28, 2006

A potential partnership between Realtek and Intel whereby Realtek Semiconductor physical (PHY) interface technology is licensed for wireless USB solutions should lead to increased gross margins and net profits for the IC design house, industry sources indicated. Read more

Marvell to license 3G protocol software stack from Motorola

Published on February 13, 2007

Marvell on February 12 announced that it has reached an agreement with Motorola to license the Motorola TTPCom cellular protocol software stack, which Marvell says will enable it to deliver a comprehensive hardware and software platforms for 3G smartphone manufacturers. Read more

Samsung and Marvell develop 3 Gbit SATA drive

Published on October 19, 2004

Samsung and Marvell said the companies will be first to offer harddrives supporting native 3.0 Gbit I/O transaction capabilities in addition to SATA Native Command Queuing (NCQ). Read more

Marvell joins 'One Laptop Per Child' initiative

Published on May 09, 2006

Marvell announced in a press release on 8 May that it has become a corporate sponsor of the "One Laptop Per Child" (OLPC) initiative. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

Stalker: Clear Sky--Is Your System Ready?

Published on September 30, 2008

Thinking about picking up the latest update to Stalker, but not sure if your graphics subsystem can handle it? Hang on as we take you through a performance tour and demonstrate how the game has been prettied up. Read more

Part 4: Avivo HD Vs. PureVideo HD

Published on September 29, 2008

The 780G chipset/Radeon HD 3200 and the MCP78S chipset/GeForce 8200 provide the first integrated graphics solutions that can accelerate Blu-ray playback. We dig deep into how well they work with high quality Blu-ray 1080p video playback. Read more

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more

Maxtor's Shared Storage Does NAS At Home

Published on September 25, 2008

What do you do with all the data you collect at home? Network attached storage is the solution. We test Maxtor's Shared Storage II and find that it is also suitable for use in small businesses. Read more

 

Realtek vs. Marvell vs. Intel

Advanced Search

There are 101 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Realtek vs. Marvell vs. Intel
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Is there a difference in reliably and performance with onboard Gigabit Ethernet LAN made by Realtek, Marvell, Intel? Is one better than the other?

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

For what purpose?
If this is for a home computer, then no.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Really depends on the chip, as there are many different chips made from each company
but as long as they have (or there are) bugless drivers for their chips, I'm content
as for current onboard ethernet, they should all be the same unless you are utilizing your computer with some super fast connection or are using it as a dedicated server - then I wouldn't use onboard
if I did have to choose one, my preference would be Intel as I had great experience with their NICs

I always think separate NICs are better (as in performance) than their onboard counterparts (I could be wrong though)
my old mobo doesn't have onboard lan and I would disable it if it did

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

kolix wrote :

Really depends on the chip, as there are many different chips made from each company
but as long as they have (or there are) bugless drivers for their chips, I'm content
as for current onboard ethernet, they should all be the same unless you are utilizing your computer with some super fast connection or are using it as a dedicated server - then I wouldn't use onboard
if I did have to choose one, my preference would be Intel as I had great experience with their NICs

I always think separate NICs are better (as in performance) than their onboard counterparts (I could be wrong though)
my old mobo doesn't have onboard lan and I would disable it if it did



Onboard is the same as the card its self - they use the same pci/pcie bus etc.

Intel has the advantage of equal or better throughput aswell as lower cpu usage


---------------
Q6600@3510/1560 + TT BigTyphoon+Mod
4gb XMS6400 C5's / Gigabyte EP35-DS3P
XFX 8800GT/512
** Pwning Bulldozers **
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Well...it really comes down to this: a LAN chipset is only as good as the interface that it is connected to. A PCI NIC will have roughly the same performance as a onboard chipset connected through the PCI bus, and a PCIe NIC will have roughly the same performance as a onboard chipset connected through the PCIe bus, but a PCIe of either will KILL a PCI of either, even if the bus is only of x1 width.

Now, moving on to your question of brands...I've never seen an Intel onboard chipset, so I really can't address that, but, both Marvell and Realtek make good stuff, so you're fine with either. Just remember, PCIe > PCI.

Live Free or Die Hard!
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Onboard Realtek tend to transfer at around 30MB/sec on Vista, Onboard Marvell around 35MB/sec.. while my PCIe x1 Intel transfers around 55MB/sec.

There is a difference. The Intel NIC is a hardware solution with a dedicated Network processor whereas the Realtek and Marvell solutions are simply a Codec (think of it as AC97) with the processing being handled by the system processor.

Intel NIC's also have a lower ping in games.


---------------
Intel Core 2 QX9650 @ x.xxGhz | 2x 2GB OCZ Platinum XTC PC2-8000 DDR2 RAM | 2x Visiontek Radeon HD 4870X2 2GB Graphics Card | Intel Pro/1000 PT NIC | Auzentech Prelude 7.1 Audio | 2x 150GB WD Raptor 10K RPM RAID0 | 500GB Seagate 7200.11 7.2K RPM HD | LG G

Go to:
 

Google ads