Ad
News

AMD home networking chip gets Microsoft nod

Published on April 23, 1999

AMD's PCnet-Home controller is the first Home Phoneline Networking Alliance (HomePNA) product to receive Microsoft PC 98 certification.The PC 98 designation ensures that the PCnet-Home controller is compatible with Microsoft Windows NT, 95, 98, and all other products bearing the PC 98 logo.The PCnet-Home controller is currently featured in consumer home networking products including Diamond Multimedia' s HomeFree Phoneline Network Kit, Linksys' HomeLink Phoneline Network Kit, and Actiontec's ActionLink Home Networking Kit.Information on AMD's home networking controller is posted at http://www.amd.com. Read more

Intel takes USB networking home

Published on September 23, 1999

Intel has launched a home network product designed to take advantage of the USB port on newer computers. Read more

D-Link offers power line home network kit

Published on October 24, 2006

D-Link, the company best known for its home networking products, today announced the availability of a new device, the "Power Line Network Kit", which allows consumers to expand an existing home network through existing electrical wiring. Read more

D-Link, Accton gear up to fight Linksys in home networking

Published on August 21, 2002

Two Taiwanese network equipment makers have seemingly joined hands to challenge Linksys in the US home-networking market. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on November 28, 2008

We tightened the budget on this month’s enthusiast-level system while loosening our belt for the low-cost gamer box by a similar percentage. Today we gauge the effect of these changes on performance and value and compare to last month's machines. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Enthusiast PC

Published on November 27, 2008

On this, the second day of our System Builder Marathon, Don turns down the price tag of his mid-range build looking for a sweet spot just above the $1,000 marker. Let's see what sort of hardware he found for it! Read more

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Published on November 26, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon is all about your feedback to us. We've revamped our entry-level and mid-range PCs with new price points. Let's kick things off with what we think is the best value at a $625 price point! Read more

The State Of The Personal Computer

Published on November 25, 2008

Where were we in 2008 and where are we heading in 2009? In his State of the Personal Computer address, Alan Dang shares his insights as a user of three different platforms--Mac, Windows, and Linux. Read more

 

Complex Home Network

Advanced Search

There are 219 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Complex Home Network
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

I have just moved into a flat with 7 other guys. They currently have two ADSL2 connections coming in, both syncing at around 18 meg downstream for a combined 36 meg. There is no flat wide LAN setup right now, therefore 3 guys are connecting wired/wirelessly to one router and 4 to the other. Obviously, for gaming and filesharing this is less than ideal so I'd like to LAN everyone together, 8 pcs + servers/consoles etc.

On the network I plan to have a server machine running as a DNS/DHCP/teamspeak/fileserver/VPN gateway/webserver, although the latter two roles are just for me to play around with. There is a possibility of having a 2nd fileserver but I'm not sure about that at this point. Also in the flat are 3 PS3s and two Xbox 360s which all require internet connectivity. I would like to have at least one wireless access point on the network for laptops/PDAs/smartphones.

I'm relatively happy with creating the internal LAN segment of the network: I have two gigabit switches and will use two cables to connect them together to hopefully avoid any bottlenecks. The 8 computers, server(s), wirless access point and other wired devices will all just be plugged into the switches. Nice and simple so far.

This issue comes with the 2 ADSL connections. The connections will used for gaming, browsing and downloading (torrent/newsgroups etc). Therefore both ping and speed should be as good as possible. I want to make the most of the available bandwidth.

I know I can manually configure the DHCP leasing in Server 2003 to assign devices equally between each gateway. However, this has the potential to not make the best use of the two connections and could lead to one connection being saturated whilst the other is barely used. Does anyone know of a better way to configure this?

I've heard of load balancing and bonded lines but it's a bit of a minefield and it's beginning to get past what I know confortably. I'm sure there are enterprise level solutions but I don't have that kind of money to spend! I could stretch to maybe £150 if there was a hardware solution but ideally I'd like to do it in software. I have no doubt that there is probably an obscure linux distro. designed specifically to do this!

If anyone can spot any flaws in my plan please let me know. Thanks for reading and thanks in advance for any advice.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: OSU Chicken Man
More Information

Create two subnets: 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0. Manually set the IP addresses and set the gateways. Split up the PC use for each connection to use.. trial and error to see which works best. Simple changes and less hassle with the small amount of PCs you have.

I would say you're over complicating a simple solution.


---------------
"Alcoholism is a disease, but it's the only one you can get yelled at for having. Goddammit Otto, you are an alcoholic. Goddammit Otto, you have Lupus... one of those two doesn't sound right." M. H.
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Hey hey

Alright, sorta at work so don't have access to my normal ebay resources...but. If you have 150 pounds to burn..get a used dual WAN router. Load balancing and everything that you could ever want :)

Profile: stranger
More Information

What type of switches are they, are teh managed switches? If so and correct me if i'm wrong but couldn't you bind the two ports together and configuring load balancing. Depends on what kind of switched you've got though. If not then go with what Riser has suggested only i'd run a DHCP server as well incase i had friends over.

Michael
Profile: stranger
More Information

Maybe I'm seeing this incorrectly, but you could create one of the machines as the switch. Windows can bridge two or more ethernet connections and does a decent job of sending traffic through the lesser used pipe. Inbound wouldnt work but unless you had an enterorise F5 or something most switches would provide the same performance.

This way, you could start tweaking and work up to creating a domain and DHCP server relatively easily. When Cable and DSL were just coming available, I had my DSL first and waited until Comcast reachd me. Well for two months I bridged them and it was insane. Any delays were not from me, if the cable bogged down it went out the DSL line and Vice versa. Actually considering it again, but Comcast has us up to 12MBps and I haven't come close to maxing.



Go to:
 

Google ads