Ad
News

LSI Debuts PCI RAID Storage Adapter

Published on September 19, 2003

LSI Logic Corp. Read more

Lacie announces 5 TB SATA RAID

Published on August 15, 2007

Lacie is offering a 5-disk RAID with a capacity of 5 TB (5 x 1 TB). The "S2S" uses a 3 Gb/s SATA interface and is promised to achieve burst data transfer rates of more than 200 MB/s. Lacie said that up to four S2S boxes can be connected via an included e Read more

NEC selects Promise's Serial ATA RAID 5 solution for server systems

Published on August 14, 2003

Promise Technology, the originator and leading supplier of ATA/SATA RAID solutions, on August 13 announced that NEC has selected its Serial ATA (SATA) RAID 5 solution for use in server systems. Read more

3ware Launches Second Generation Performance-Driven Serial ATA RAID

Published on July 15, 2003

3ware Inc., a leading provider of high-capacity, switched Serial ATA (SATA) RAID storage solutions, today announced the availability of its second generation SATA RAID controllers - the Escalade(tm) 8506 series, and sixth generation Parallel RAID controllers - the Escalade 7506 series. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

Power Supply Roundup: Part II

Published on November 07, 2008

In Part I of our power supply roundup, we went through five mainstream PSUs rated at up to 700 W. Round two sees us tackle another seven mid-range units in an effort to determine which power supply deserves your attention. Read more

Roundup: The Best Overclocking Software

Published on November 06, 2008

Interested in overclocking but not quite sure where to start? We round up some of our favorite software utilities for tweaking processors, memory, graphics, and chipsets. Read more

Tom's Holiday Buyer's Guide 2008, Part 1

Published on November 05, 2008

Welcome to the first installment in our six-part Tom's Holiday Buyer's Guide. In Part 1, two beautiful models help showcase some of our favorite no-hassle hardware gifts for 2008. Read more

Round Up: Five Powerful, Light Ultraportables

Published on November 05, 2008

Executives, road warriors, and gadget geeks all lust after ultraportable notebooks. Five of these amazing machines battle it out in this roundup. Read more

 

raid 0

Advanced Search

There are 43 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : raid 0
 
Profile: journeyman
More Information

hello,

i understood that raid 0 will give better preformance,

can someone please explain to me what exactly does it do?
raid 0

how does it work? and why better preformance?

tnx

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Raid 0, or striping (as opposed to raid 1 mirroring) will make two physical drives into one logical drive. When reading or writing data to the drive, data is split between the two drives. Theoretically there would be double performance because when you are writing say 100 megs to the drive, 50 megs is written onto each. There is some overhead with raid which results in there not really being a true doubling in performance but it does provide significant performance increase over a single drive. I run two 36 gig raptors on my computer and I notice a difference.

The disadvantage is that if either drive goes bad (say a head crash) then you lose the data on both drives. For this reason, I only keep the OS and installed programs on my raid 0 drives. All my data, including my documents and settings folder is kept on another drive.


Message edited by winkgood on 12-25-2007 at 08:02:53 AM

---------------
Intel C2D E6400 OC@3.33Ghz, Asus P5B Deluxe Wifi/AP, EVGA 8800 GT 512,
Zalman 9500, Corsair Dom PC6400 2*1 Gig (4-4-4-12), Corsair 620HX PSU,
2 x WD Raptor 36Gig (10,000 RPM) Raid 0, Other HDs: 750 + 500 + 250 Gigs
Samsung 20X DVD-RW, Antec 900
Profile: journeyman
More Information

RAID 0 (Redundant Array of Indenpendent - or Inexpensive - Drives/Disks) is striping data across two or more drives, with no redundancy. RAID is a misnomer for this array, probably should be AID 0, but what can you do?

Your understanding regarding a striped array with two drives is correct: it performs quicker than just using one of those drives.

Cut and pasted from elsewhere:
"Since the data is spread out over multiple disks, the reading and writing operations can take place on multiple disks at once. (My bold and italics). This can speed up hard drive access time significantly. Multiple hard drives may not improve hard disk performace as much as multiple processors may enhance the CPU performance, but it is based on a similar logic."

You could read these for more information:
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/43125-32-raid
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/0 [...] ng_charts/
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/0 [...] ng_charts/

"I want a redundant array of independent disks striping data across two drives for speed, so don't give me any redundancy!", is what some are asking without knowing it when they ask for RAID 0 on two drives. If you're aware that you're getting zero redundancy when you run RAID 0, then that's good.

When something goes belly-up with RAID 0, the array fails, all is lost.

At the very least, keep another non-RAID drive for backing up files. It is not uncommon to have 2 x 160-320GB drives in RAID 0 with another 250+GB drive as storage. Or if you do have 3 identical drives to start with, go with RAID 5 if you prefer.

I'm assuming you've got a bit of an idea about setting up the array in BIOS and loading the drivers for your operating system when you install it.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Thanks for the help was interested in this myself.. Merry Christmas everyone, thanks to everyone who are always so helpful on these boards!!

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

One last quick reminder. AID0 only works when you are accessing the drives. For example, it won't boost your FPS while gaming, because the game runs in RAM. Increasing your CPU or GPU (or increasing your ram to a point where it finally runs in ram) will provide a boost. You can run an AID0 setup, but your FPS will still be 45FPS.

It will provide an increase in the level load times, but shouldn't cut the time anywhere near half. Thats because loading a level is more then just reading info from the harddrive. Your CPU needs to uncompress the data, and send info to the GPU. Depending on the size of the maps, you could see only a second or two reduction in time.

If you do anything that causes you to read/write a lot to harddrives, AID0 can pay off bigtime. But as I said, most of us don't need it.


---------------
The voice of REASON
Do NOT feed the TROLLS!
Always a DEMON!


Go to:
 

Google ads