Ad
News

Lacie intros 4 TB 4-disk RAID

Published on September 05, 2007

Lacie today announced the "Biggest Quadra", a 4-disk RAID enclosure with up to 4 TB of storage space. The device has been designed to appeal to workstation users and supports RAID levels 0, 0+1, 5 as well as 5 + hot spare. The Biggest Quadra is scheduled Read more

HP introduces FATA disk

Published on April 06, 2004

Working with disk manufacturer Seagate, Hewlett Packard this week announced a new disk drive which possesses similar characteristics to SATA in terms of cost and performance, but uses the FC protocol. Read more

Adaptec Introduces New Serial ATA RAID Controller with Advanced Data Protection

Published on June 23, 2003

Adaptec today introduced a Serial ATA RAID controller featuring Adaptec's enterprise-level data protection capabilities to maximize performance and data availability for high-end workstations and entry-level servers using Serial ATA disk drives. Read more

Nexsan RAID, SAN, and Disk-to-Disk Network Storage

Published on November 09, 2001

Next week, Omid and Dave will be on-site at Comdex in Las Vegas, attending all the goings on and letting us in on all the new tech goodies that will be paraded about. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on November 28, 2008

We tightened the budget on this month’s enthusiast-level system while loosening our belt for the low-cost gamer box by a similar percentage. Today we gauge the effect of these changes on performance and value and compare to last month's machines. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Enthusiast PC

Published on November 27, 2008

On this, the second day of our System Builder Marathon, Don turns down the price tag of his mid-range build looking for a sweet spot just above the $1,000 marker. Let's see what sort of hardware he found for it! Read more

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Published on November 26, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon is all about your feedback to us. We've revamped our entry-level and mid-range PCs with new price points. Let's kick things off with what we think is the best value at a $625 price point! Read more

The State Of The Personal Computer

Published on November 25, 2008

Where were we in 2008 and where are we heading in 2009? In his State of the Personal Computer address, Alan Dang shares his insights as a user of three different platforms--Mac, Windows, and Linux. Read more

 

4 Disk RAID 5 Performance

Advanced Search

There are 52 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : 4 Disk RAID 5 Performance
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

We just setup a RAID 5 using 4 Ultra 3 SCSI 18GB drives on a Mylex Acceleraid 250 Ultra2 RAID controller in an older 2U Intel server. I set the controller to 80MB/s transfer speed. Looking at the array manager in Windows I can see that the drive interfaces and controller really are running at 80MB/s like they should. However, performance seems slower than I expected from a setup like this. I have a hunch that the backplane is a bottleneck. In looking at the array manager I can see the ESG-SHV SCA HSBP M10 backplane as SCSI ID: 6, but it shows the transfer speed to be ASYNC and the bus width to be 8 bit(narrow). To my understanding that would limit it to 5MB/s and explain the slow speed. The only problem with that explanation is that the enclosure is built for operation with Ultra2 drives and even has a built in Ultra2 Adaptec controller (not in use currently) on the L440GX+ server board. It would make no sense to put a backplane in a server which would cripple its speed. The enclosure is the Intel ISP2150. Technical specifications can be found here: http://www.intel.com/support/mothe [...] 013775.htm. I realize that term "slow" is relative. I am comparing my experience with this RAID to that of a single 36GB Raptor. File transfers seem to be at least 4 times slower than the single Raptor, but perhaps my expectations are flawed. Thanks.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: stranger
More Information

The only thing I can think of is that the Backplane is an Ultra2 Backplane. Acording to Wikipeida (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCSI) the system should clock in at about 40MB/s. You may want to benchmark it.

Profile: old hand
More Information

The backplane by itself shouldn't slow down everything. If the backplane is ASYNC, then the controller has to talk to it at 5MB/sec, but that doesn't slow down the drives.

Many tape autoloaders are like this - the tape drive is 80MB/sec or 160MB/sec speed, while the changer robotics are ASYNC. That doesn't slow the tape drive down.

The drives are only 18GB, which are fairly old and not the same speed as drives of today. I'd benchmark a single drive and see what it comes out to be, then benchmark the RAID 5 setup. The Mylex card isn't the fastest RAID card out there, either, so that could be a source of the problem.


---------------
- SomeJoe7777

"Did he dazzle you with his extensive knowledge of mineral water? Or was it his in-depth analysis of, uh, uh, Marky Mark that finally reeled you in?" - Troy Dyer (Ethan Hawke), Reality Bites, 1994


Go to:
 

Google ads