Ad
News

Quad-cores for all, Intel price cut

Published on July 24, 2007

Santa Clara (CA) – Intel’s not-so-secret price cut has been officially announced. The company slashed prices of its entry-level quad-core processors by 50% and also released six new processors in the Core 2 Extreme, Core 2 Quad and Core 2 Duo lines. The Read more

Alienware announces desktop PC with Intel's latest quad-core processor

Published on January 11, 2007

Alienware said it "will" launch Intel's second quad-core desktop processor, the 2.4 GHz Core 2 Quad Q6600, on its Area-51 7500 desktop system. Read more

Intel to launch pricing campaign in Q2 2007

Published on December 21, 2006

Intel will launch a pricing campaign in the second quarter of 2007, with the price for the Core 2 Quad Q6600 processor falling to $530, according to industry sources. Read more

Micron introduces 78 nm-made DDR2-1066

Published on May 05, 2007

... Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more

Maxtor's Shared Storage Does NAS At Home

Published on September 25, 2008

What do you do with all the data you collect at home? Network attached storage is the solution. We test Maxtor's Shared Storage II and find that it is also suitable for use in small businesses. Read more

SLI & Centrino 2: Gaming Laptops Battle

Published on September 24, 2008

Take four gaming laptops. Arm two of them with SLI and make the others Centrino 2-compatible. You're looking at a high-end collection of the latest mobile technology battling it out for benchmark supremacy and your hard-earned dollars. Read more

1,000 GB: Three Samsung TB Drives

Published on September 23, 2008

Storage vendors split the desktop hard drive market into performance, mainstream, and energy-efficient products. We looked at Samsung’s Spinpoint F, the RAID version and the EcoGreen F to discover how a 1,000 GB drive differs from another. Read more

  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Motherboards & Memory » Memory » Q6600 Overclocking (1066 or 800 RAM)
 

Q6600 Overclocking (1066 or 800 RAM)

Advanced Search

There are 299 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
 Page : 1 2
Previous
Author
 Thread : Q6600 Overclocking (1066 or 800 RAM)
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

So far I have read that you can overclock a Q6600 to 3.6GHZ on air. In my system I dont want to deal with liquid so I wanna stick with air cooling. So basically I was wondering would I be able to hit that speed with DDR2 800 without overclocking the ram or should I go with 1066? Also, I was wondering if I would get better performance if I bought 1066 and underclocked it to run at tighter timings? I plan on getting 4x1GB sticks. Price is not a large consideration here either.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by stuoke on 07-16-2007 at 04:21:32 AM
Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: addict
More Information

3.6 on air I think that's a bit optimistic. 3.2 is about average not to say some didn't get 3.6. Hell many folks with E6600 don't hit 3.6. Rather than waste your money on better ram put it into the cpu. In terms of real world performance the best ram only makes 5% difference over value 667. When I was OC'ing my E6600 I backed my ram way down the difference in performance was insignifigant in application testing. Yes it made difference but not enough that you would noticed without benchmarking tools.

Profile: addict
More Information

Yeah, 3.6 is good for an E6600, but the Q6600s run waaaaay hotter, would be surprised if you got anywhere near that tbh.

As regards putting the money you'd spend on better RAM into the CPU, I don't think it would make much difference, as the next CPU up is an 'extreme', which cost an absolute fortune. Unless you could put that money into a GFX card upgrade if you game, wouldn't be too bad spending it on the PC8500 considering how cheap it is at the moment. As bydesign says though, will only give a small performance increase, so perhaps you should just save the money :)

Profile: stranger
More Information

well i am running Q6600 @ 3.4 on air cooling with 800 RAM...

I let the timings auto and running it 1:1 which results in stable system..

btw.. dont get 4X1GB ram.. instead go with 2X2GB
2 reasons for that :

1- easier to overclock ram with less modules
2- you still got 2 slots to upgrade your system to 8GB

Specs:

Q6600 @ 3.4 Ghz (cooler scythe ninja plus rev.B)
Board : Gigabyte GA-P35-DQ6
Ram : 2xGB OZC 2GB8004GK
PSU : Enermax Infinity 720W

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Damn 3.4 on Air....

I got my q6600 just over 3 and it was running at 69 degrees under load. You must have an ultra flat heatsink/processor or mine suck!

Profile: member
More Information

stuoke wrote :

So far I have read that you can overclock a Q6600 to 3.6GHZ on air. In my system I dont want to deal with liquid so I wanna stick with air cooling. So basically I was wondering would I be able to hit that speed with DDR2 800 without overclocking the ram or should I go with 1066? Also, I was wondering if I would get better performance if I bought 1066 and underclocked it to run at tighter timings? I plan on getting 4x1GB sticks. Price is not a large consideration here either.




wanting to get a 3.6ghz on a quad without watercooling ?
you will have to try 5-10 cpu to get one that fits what you want... then, be sure you have a rock stable motherboard... 800mhz ram is sufficient with 9x400 = 3600. you won't get to 3.6ghz using another multi with air cooling... even some vapochilled cpu didn't get to 3.5ghz so...

personnally, i would get the lowest featured board with a P35/ICH9R watercool to the chipset, video card and maybe ram with ocz flex units...
and a vapochill for the cpu. might be the black pearl edition...

with a low power draw video card, i should be fine with the PSU supplied with the antec SONATA III while watercooling and vapochill aren't powered by it.

i expect

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

I'm run @3.6GHz on air and my RAM is Crucial Ballistix Tracer 1066 or PC2 8500. These babys run @800MHz @ 3-3-3-8 @2.2v, or 1200MHz @5-5-5-15 @2.2v.


---------------
Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.2GHz * Asus P5E * 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers * Raptor X * EVGA Geforce 8800GTX 768MB 651MHz/1525MHz/2100MHz * X-FI Fatal1ty Pro * Enermax Infiniti 720W PSU * Creative THX5.1 * Tuniq Tower 120
Silverstone TJ09 * Windows XP
Profile: stranger
More Information

This is really making my decision hard here. I am thinking I might go with the Ultra 120 Thermo electric cooler. It looks like the best air cooler out there and almost comparable to water cooling.

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

stuoke wrote :

This is really making my decision hard here. I am thinking I might go with the Ultra 120 Thermo electric cooler. It looks like the best air cooler out there and almost comparable to water cooling.



I am having a tough time keeping my E6600 @3.6GHz cool, and you think you can air cool "four cores" on air at 3.6GHz.


Message edited by systemlord on 07-17-2007 at 05:03:43 AM

---------------
Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.2GHz * Asus P5E * 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers * Raptor X * EVGA Geforce 8800GTX 768MB 651MHz/1525MHz/2100MHz * X-FI Fatal1ty Pro * Enermax Infiniti 720W PSU * Creative THX5.1 * Tuniq Tower 120
Silverstone TJ09 * Windows XP
Profile: newbie
More Information

XgoDoT wrote :

well i am running Q6600 @ 3.4 on air cooling with 800 RAM...

I let the timings auto and running it 1:1 which results in stable system..

btw.. dont get 4X1GB ram.. instead go with 2X2GB
2 reasons for that :

1- easier to overclock ram with less modules
2- you still got 2 slots to upgrade your system to 8GB

Specs:

Q6600 @ 3.4 Ghz (cooler scythe ninja plus rev.B)
Board : Gigabyte GA-P35-DQ6
Ram : 2xGB OZC 2GB8004GK
PSU : Enermax Infinity 720W



Wassup,
Great Info , whats the exact model number of your memory modules from OCZ ?!
peace

Profile: stranger
More Information

in all the benches I have seen with games.. 90% of it is CPU and GPU very little has to do with ram and FSB ect is this about right? in all the expertise out there ?

Profile: addict
More Information

Yup, ram speed doesn't account for much performance. In gaming terms it would be gfx, cpu, (as you mentioned, they are the major two) hdd, ram in that order.

Profile: old hand
More Information

W-Molders wrote :

in all the benches I have seen with games.. 90% of it is CPU and GPU very little has to do with ram and FSB ect is this about right? in all the expertise out there ?



There's a load of **** !

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

I would grab the DDR2-800 and get as close to 3.6GHz as you can. Which so far doesn't seem to be very difficult to do on air http://www.xtremesystems.org/forum [...] p?t=152722

Of course every chip is different and things like lapping your heatsink and/or cpu will help maximize your OC.

Profile: stranger
More Information
n°1733214
08-03-2007 at 04:57:32 AM