Ad
News

Mobile Mosquito premium rate SMS "Trojan" not a virus

Published on August 12, 2004

The 'Trojan' SMS dialler infecting mobile phones running pirate copies of the "Mosquitos" game is not actually a Trojan at all but rather a botched copy-protection feature of the original game. Read more

New Trojan Horse Breaking its way into Windows Systems

Published on November 26, 2003

A new Trojan horse hidden in an e-mail purported to be carrying pornographic pictures is beginning to make the rounds on the Internet. Read more

Intego issues Mac OS X Trojan Horse warning

Published on April 09, 2004

Macintosh security specialists, Intego on Thursday issued a security warning for the first Trojan horse to affect Mac OS X. Read more

Phel trojan horse attacks Windows XP

Published on December 31, 2004

Security firm Symantec is warning users of a newly discovered Trojan horse named Phel - an anagram of the word help - that attacks Windows XP. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

Intel's Core i7: Blazing Fast, But Crippled O/C

Published on November 03, 2008

Core i7--previously referred to as Nehalem--requires new motherboards, coolers and memory. Its performance is compelling and means AMD is falling behind even further, but Intel is putting in some speed bumps that will impact overclocking enthusiasts. Read more

System Builder Marathon: Performance and Value

Published on October 31, 2008

Three dramatically different builds face off in show of performance, defining the real value of each. Our mainstream system is designed to meet the needs of most users. Who should spend more and who can live with less? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $500 Gaming PC

Published on October 30, 2008

On this, the second to last day of our System Builder Marathon series, we add a $500 gaming PC to the mix. It's not going to be as quick as our other two builds, but we think Paul was able to get some serious value from this thing. Read more

Tom's SBM: The $1,500 Mainstream PC

Published on October 29, 2008

We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more

Relatives contents
 

Trojan-gen

Advanced Search

There are 53 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Trojan-gen
 
More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

 

Hi, according to Avast, I've been infected with "Win32: Trojan-gen (Other)".
Can someone please tell me where to post the HiJack This log? And feel free
to throw in any advice as well. Thanks.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

 

http://forum.aumha.org/viewforum.php?f=30
http://forums.spywareinfo.com/,
http://castlecops.com/forum67.html


--
Regards


Ron Badour, MS MVP for W98
Tips: http://home.satx.rr.com/badour
Knowledge Base Info:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=kbinfo



"Roger Fink" <fink@*****.net> wrote in message
news:%23NgR1kHqFHA.1024@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi, according to Avast, I've been infected with "Win32: Trojan-gen
> (Other)".
> Can someone please tell me where to post the HiJack This log? And feel
> free
> to throw in any advice as well. Thanks.
>
>

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

 

Thank you Ron.

Ron Badour wrote:
> http://forum.aumha.org/viewforum.php?f=30
> http://forums.spywareinfo.com/,
> http://castlecops.com/forum67.html
>
>
>
> "Roger Fink" <fink@*****.net> wrote in message
> news:%23NgR1kHqFHA.1024@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Hi, according to Avast, I've been infected with "Win32: Trojan-gen
>> (Other)".
>> Can someone please tell me where to post the HiJack This log? And
>> feel free
>> to throw in any advice as well. Thanks.

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

 

From: "Roger Fink" <fink@*****.net>

| Hi, according to Avast, I've been infected with "Win32: Trojan-gen (Other)".
| Can someone please tell me where to post the HiJack This log? And feel free
| to throw in any advice as well. Thanks.
|

There are anti virus News Groups specifically for this type of discussion.

microsoft.public.security.virus
alt.comp.virus
alt.comp.anti-virus

That sounds like a Generic Trojan detection.

Did it flag a particular file ?
If so what is the fully qualified name and path to that file ?

In the mean time, you can do the following which has modules for; McAfee, Sophos and Trend
Micro scanners...


Download MULTI_AV.EXE from the URL --
http://www.ik-cs.com/programs/virtools/Multi_AV.exe

It is a self-extracting ZIP file that contains the Kixtart Script Interpreter {
http://kixtart.org Kixtart is CareWare } three batch files, five Kixtart scripts, one Link
(.LNK) file, a PDF instruction file and two utilities; UNZIP.EXE and WGET.EXE. It will
simplify the process of using; Sophos, Trend and McAfee Anti Virus Command Line Scanners to
remove viruses, Trojans and various other malware.

C:\AV-CLS\StartMenu.BAT -- { or Double-click on 'Start Menu' in C:\AV-CLS}
This will bring up the initial menu of choices and should be executed in Normal Mode. This
way all the components can be downloaded from each AV vendor’s web site.
The choices are; Sophos, Trend, McAfee, Exit the menu and Reboot the PC.

You can choose to go to each menu item and just download the needed files or you can
download the files and perform a scan in Normal Mode. Once you have downloaded the files
needed for each scanner you want to use, you should reboot the PC into Safe Mode [F8 key
during boot] and re-run the menu again and choose which scanner you want to run in Safe
Mode. It is suggested to run the scanners in both Safe Mode and Normal Mode.

When the menu is displayed hitting 'H' or 'h' will bring up a more comprehensive PDF help
file.

To use this utility, perform the following...
Execute; Multi_AV.exe { Note: You must use the default folder C:\AV-CLS }
Choose; Unzip
Choose; Close

Execute; C:\AV-CLS\StartMenu.BAT
{ or Double-click on 'Start Menu' in C:\AV-CLS }

NOTE: You may have to disable your software FireWall or allow WGET.EXE to go through your
FireWall to allow it to download the needed AV vendor related files.

* * * Please report back your results * * *


--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

 

Thank you David. Before Avast caught it (not on the fly, I'm sorry to say) I
ran scans with Spybot and AdAware, which were negative. I then downloaded
and ran T-M SysClean, which I'm familiar with. I then ran HJT and posted the
log to AUMHA forum, and of course I'm hoping they'll respond shortly. So I'd
like to see how that plays out for starters.

Thanks for the newsgroup recommendations. I'll use them for future problems,
and possibly this one as well, depending on how it goes from here.

In answer to your question (I think), the write up in Quarantine says:
Original File Name: Shellexp.exe
Original Folder: C:\WINDOWS\System\
Size of file: 303616


David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Roger Fink" <fink@*****.net>
>
>> Hi, according to Avast, I've been infected with "Win32: Trojan-gen
>> (Other)".
>> Can someone please tell me where to post the HiJack This log? And
>> feel free
>> to throw in any advice as well. Thanks.
>>
>
> There are anti virus News Groups specifically for this type of
> discussion.
>
> microsoft.public.security.virus
> alt.comp.virus
> alt.comp.anti-virus
>
> That sounds like a Generic Trojan detection.
>
> Did it flag a particular file ?
> If so what is the fully qualified name and path to that file ?
>
> In the mean time, you can do the following which has modules for;
> McAfee, Sophos and Trend Micro scanners...
>
>
> Download MULTI_AV.EXE from the URL --
> http://www.ik-cs.com/programs/virtools/Multi_AV.exe
>
> It is a self-extracting ZIP file that contains the Kixtart Script
> Interpreter { http://kixtart.org Kixtart is CareWare } three batch
> files, five Kixtart scripts, one Link (.LNK) file, a PDF instruction
> file and two utilities; UNZIP.EXE and WGET.EXE. It will simplify the
> process of using; Sophos, Trend and McAfee Anti Virus Command Line
> Scanners to remove viruses, Trojans and various other malware.
>
> C:\AV-CLS\StartMenu.BAT -- { or Double-click on 'Start Menu' in
> C:\AV-CLS}
> This will bring up the initial menu of choices and should be executed
> in Normal Mode. This way all the components can be downloaded from
> each AV vendor’s web site.
> The choices are; Sophos, Trend, McAfee, Exit the menu and Reboot the
> PC.
>
> You can choose to go to each menu item and just download the needed
> files or you can download the files and perform a scan in Normal
> Mode. Once you have downloaded the files needed for each scanner you
> want to use, you should reboot the PC into Safe Mode [F8 key during
> boot] and re-run the menu again and choose which scanner you want to
> run in Safe Mode. It is suggested to run the scanners in both Safe
> Mode and Normal Mode.
>
> When the menu is displayed hitting 'H' or 'h' will bring up a more
> comprehensive PDF help file.
>
> To use this utility, perform the following...
> Execute; Multi_AV.exe { Note: You must use the default folder
> C:\AV-CLS }
> Choose; Unzip
> Choose; Close
>
> Execute; C:\AV-CLS\StartMenu.BAT
> { or Double-click on 'Start Menu' in C:\AV-CLS }
>
> NOTE: You may have to disable your software FireWall or allow
> WGET.EXE to go through your FireWall to allow it to download the
> needed AV vendor related files.
>
> * * * Please report back your results * * *

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

 

From: "Roger Fink" <fink@*****.net>

| Thank you David. Before Avast caught it (not on the fly, I'm sorry to say) I
| ran scans with Spybot and AdAware, which were negative. I then downloaded
| and ran T-M SysClean, which I'm familiar with. I then ran HJT and posted the
| log to AUMHA forum, and of course I'm hoping they'll respond shortly. So I'd
| like to see how that plays out for starters.
|
| Thanks for the newsgroup recommendations. I'll use them for future problems,
| and possibly this one as well, depending on how it goes from here.
|
| In answer to your question (I think), the write up in Quarantine says:
| Original File Name: Shellexp.exe
| Original Folder: C:\WINDOWS\System\
| Size of file: 303616
|

SpyBot and Ad-aware are for malware but for the non-viral malware category. The anti virus
software covers Trojans better than the non-viral malware applications (even though Trojans
are not true viruses, they are in a cross-over gategory).

Like I said, it was a generic detection based upon the Avast name. To get more information,
please submit a sample of "Shellexp.exe" to Virus Total --
http://www.virustotal.com/flash/index_en.html
The submission will then be tested against many different AV vendor's scanners.
That will give you an idea what it is and who recognizes it. In addition, unless told
otherwise, Virus Total will provide the sample to all paricipating vendors.

When you get the report, please post back the exact reults.

From those results other vendor's virus encyclopedias can be examined for more information
on this infector. Avast does not keep a good encyclopedia. You will also find there is no
standardization in the naming convention of infectors between AV vendors. For example, the
following infector names are for the same infector.

W32/Chode-F -- Sophos
W32/Kelvir.worm.ev -- McAfee
Win32:VBbot -- Avast
Backdoor.Tixanbot -- Symantec

I am glad you are familiar with Tend Micro's Sysclean utility. It is a good Broad-spectrum
removal tool. It is also incorporated in my Multi AV Scanning tool I posted about and it
automates the process of downloading the needed files and running the uitility. The utility
does likewise for the Sophos and McAfee Command Line scanners. It makes using these "On
Demand" scanners easy to use and it is a excellent verification/removal tool.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

 

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Roger Fink" <fink@*****.net>
>
>> Thank you David. Before Avast caught it (not on the fly, I'm sorry
>> to say) I
>> ran scans with Spybot and AdAware, which were negative. I then
>> downloaded
>> and ran T-M SysClean, which I'm familiar with. I then ran HJT and
>> posted the
>> log to AUMHA forum, and of course I'm hoping they'll respond
>> shortly. So I'd
>> like to see how that plays out for starters.
>>
>> Thanks for the newsgroup recommendations. I'll use them for future
>> problems,
>> and possibly this one as well, depending on how it goes from here.
>>
>> In answer to your question (I think), the write up in Quarantine
>> says:
>> Original File Name: Shellexp.exe
>> Original Folder: C:\WINDOWS\System\
>> Size of file: 303616
>>
>
> SpyBot and Ad-aware are for malware but for the non-viral malware
> category. The anti virus software covers Trojans better than the
> non-viral malware applications (even though Trojans are not true
> viruses, they are in a cross-over gategory).
>
> Like I said, it was a generic detection based upon the Avast name.
> To get more information, please submit a sample of "Shellexp.exe" to
> Virus Total -- http://www.virustotal.com/flash/index_en.html
> The submission will then be tested against many different AV vendor's
> scanners.
> That will give you an idea what it is and who recognizes it. In
> addition, unless told otherwise, Virus Total will provide the sample
> to all paricipating vendors.
>
> When you get the report, please post back the exact reults.
>
> From those results other vendor's virus encyclopedias can be examined
> for more information on this infector. Avast does not keep a good
> encyclopedia. You will also find there is no standardization in the
> naming convention of infectors between AV vendors. For example, the
> following infector names are for the same infector.
>
> W32/Chode-F -- Sophos
> W32/Kelvir.worm.ev -- McAfee
> Win32:VBbot -- Avast
> Backdoor.Tixanbot -- Symantec
>
> I am glad you are familiar with Tend Micro's Sysclean utility. It is
> a good Broad-spectrum removal tool. It is also incorporated in my
> Multi AV Scanning tool I posted about and it automates the process of
> downloading the needed files and running the uitility. The utility
> does likewise for the Sophos and McAfee Command Line scanners. It
> makes using these "On Demand" scanners easy to use and it is a
> excellent verification/removal tool.

David - Avast makes it easy to email a file from quarantine - but only to
them (which I just did). As I read their info, the only way I can send the
file to an outside party, like Virus Total, would be to restore it to its
original location in Windows\System (to create an email attachment). To the
uninitiated that doesn't seem like a smart thing to do, but if you don't
think it creates any additional hazard I'll do it. I assume that if I were
to do this, I just send it back into quarantine after I'm done.

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

 

From: "Roger Fink" <fink@*****.net>


|
| David - Avast makes it easy to email a file from quarantine - but only to
| them (which I just did). As I read their info, the only way I can send the
| file to an outside party, like Virus Total, would be to restore it to its
| original location in Windows\System (to create an email attachment). To the
| uninitiated that doesn't seem like a smart thing to do, but if you don't
| think it creates any additional hazard I'll do it. I assume that if I were
| to do this, I just send it back into quarantine after I'm done.
|

It might be best to leave it as-is.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

Dak
Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

 

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 02:58:40 -0400, "Roger Fink" <fink@*****.net>
wrote:

>Hi, according to Avast, I've been infected with "Win32: Trojan-gen (Other)".
>Can someone please tell me where to post the HiJack This log? And feel free
>to throw in any advice as well. Thanks.
>
TUTORIALS/HELP FILES:
<http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/index.php?showtutorial=42>
<http://www.aumha.org/a/hjttutor.htm>

DO IT YOURSELF:
<http://www.help2go.com/modules.php?name=HJTDetective>
<http://www.hijackthis.de/en>
<http://hjt.iamnotageek.com/>

GET EXPERT HELP:
*NOTE: Registration is REQUIRED before posting a log*
*NOTE: Web sites NOT listed in any particular order*
<http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=30>
<http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/forum22.html>
<http://www.dslreports.com/forum/security>
<http://castlecops.com/forum67.html>
<http://www.wilderssecurity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=24>
<http://www.cybertechhelp.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=25>
<http://www.geekstogo.com/forum/Malware_Removal_HiJackThis_Logs_Go_Here-f37.html>
<http://gladiator-antivirus.com/forum/index.php?showforum=170>
<http://forum.iamnotageek.com/f-130.html>
<http://forums.maddoktor2.com/index.php?showforum=17>
<http://www.spywarewarrior.com/viewforum.php?f=5>
<http://forums.spywareinfo.com/index.php?showforum=18>
<http://forums.techguy.org/f54-s.html>
<http://forums.tomcoyote.org/index.php?showforum=27>
<http://forums.subratam.org/index.php?showforum=7>
<http://boards.cexx.org/viewforum.php?f=1>
<http://www.malwarebytes.biz/forums/index.php?showforum=5>

--
dak
My SpywareBlaster Custom Blocking List:
<http://customblockinglist.cjb.net/>

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

 

From: "dak" <postmaster@[127.0.0.1]>

| On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 02:58:40 -0400, "Roger Fink" <fink@*****.net>
| wrote:
|
>> Hi, according to Avast, I've been infected with "Win32: Trojan-gen (Other)".
>> Can someone please tell me where to post the HiJack This log? And feel free
>> to throw in any advice as well. Thanks.
>>
| TUTORIALS/HELP FILES:
| <http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/index.php?showtutorial=42>
| <http://www.aumha.org/a/hjttutor.htm>
|
| DO IT YOURSELF:
| <http://www.help2go.com/modules.php?name=HJTDetective>
| <http://www.hijackthis.de/en>
| <http://hjt.iamnotageek.com/>
|
| GET EXPERT HELP:
| *NOTE: Registration is REQUIRED before posting a log*
| *NOTE: Web sites NOT listed in any particular order*
| <http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=30>
| <http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/forum22.html>
| <http://www.dslreports.com/forum/security>
| <http://castlecops.com/forum67.html>
| <http://www.wilderssecurity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=24>
| <http://www.cybertechhelp.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=25>
| <http://www.geekstogo.com/forum/Malware_Removal_HiJackThis_Logs_Go_Here-f37.html>
| <http://gladiator-antivirus.com/forum/index.php?showforum=170>
| <http://forum.iamnotageek.com/f-130.html>
| <http://forums.maddoktor2.com/index.php?showforum=17>
| <http://www.spywarewarrior.com/viewforum.php?f=5>
| <http://forums.spywareinfo.com/index.php?showforum=18>
| <http://forums.techguy.org/f54-s.html>
| <http://forums.tomcoyote.org/index.php?showforum=27>
| <http://forums.subratam.org/index.php?showforum=7>
| <http://boards.cexx.org/viewforum.php?f=1>
| <http://www.malwarebytes.biz/forums/index.php?showforum=5>
|
| --
| dak
| My SpywareBlaster Custom Blocking List:
| <http://customblockinglist.cjb.net/>


Hmmm.... Looks like that was taken directly from the; alt.privacy.spyware FAQ.

However, I see no reference to that. It should !

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

Dak
Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

 

On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:35:40 -0400, "David H. Lipman"
<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote:

>Hmmm.... Looks like that was taken directly from the; alt.privacy.spyware FAQ.
>
>However, I see no reference to that. It should !

No, it shouldn't.
It wasn't taken from the alt.privacy.spyware FAQ. It's in the
alt.privacy.spyware FAQ because I submitted it to "shplink" for
inclusion in the alt.privacy.spyware FAQ. Try this message ID:

<sregd1p5qf15pub9bm0go2qhaqp6c19bi5@4ax.com>

The actual information was compiled from Siljaline's contributions
and my own.
But thanks for asking... Oh, that's right, you didn't... You just
made your assumptions and allegations.... :o)

--
dak
My SpywareBlaster Custom Blocking List:
<http://customblockinglist.cjb.net/>

More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

 

From: "dak" <postmaster@[127.0.0.1]>

| On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:35:40 -0400, "David H. Lipman"
| <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote:
|
>> Hmmm.... Looks like that was taken directly from the; alt.privacy.spyware FAQ.
>>
>> However, I see no reference to that. It should !
|
| No, it shouldn't.
| It wasn't taken from the alt.privacy.spyware FAQ. It's in the
| alt.privacy.spyware FAQ because I submitted it to "shplink" for
| inclusion in the alt.privacy.spyware FAQ. Try this message ID:
|
| <sregd1p5qf15pub9bm0go2qhaqp6c19bi5@4ax.com>
|
| The actual information was compiled from Siljaline's contributions
| and my own.
| But thanks for asking... Oh, that's right, you didn't... You just
| made your assumptions and allegations.... :o)
|
| --
| dak
| My SpywareBlaster Custom Blocking List:
| <http://customblockinglist.cjb.net/>

"Looks like that was taken directly from the..." is not an allegation, at best its an
assumption.

Its the "which came first, the chicken or the egg..." type deal. It is the exact text from
the FAQ so I am right in my assumption. The fact that you submitted it shplink is more than
fantastic !

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

Dak
Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

 

On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:56:10 -0400, "David H. Lipman"
<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote:

>>> Hmmm.... Looks like that was taken directly from the; alt.privacy.spyware FAQ.
>>>
>>> However, I see no reference to that. It should !
>>
>> No, it shouldn't.
>> It wasn't taken from the alt.privacy.spyware FAQ. It's in the
>> alt.privacy.spyware FAQ because I submitted it to "shplink" for
>> inclusion in the alt.privacy.spyware FAQ. Try this message ID:
>>
>> <sregd1p5qf15pub9bm0go2qhaqp6c19bi5@4ax.com>
>>
>> The actual information was compiled from Siljaline's contributions
>> and my own.
>> But thanks for asking... Oh, that's right, you didn't... You just
>> made your assumptions and allegations.... :o)
>
>"Looks like that was taken directly from the..." is not an allegation, at best its an
>assumption.
>
You assumed it was taken directly from the alt.privacy.spyware FAQ
and alleged it should have a reference to it.

>Its the "which came first, the chicken or the egg..." type deal.
>
That was solved (for *some*) a long time ago. :o)

>It is the exact text from the FAQ so I am right in my assumption. The fact that you
>submitted it shplink is more than fantastic !
>
Your assumption is wrong because it is not the exact text from the
FAQ, it's the other way around - the FAQ is the exact text from my
posts and submission. I took nothing from the FAQ, I gave to it.
And now that is solved - everyone knows that I didn't plagerize the
alt.privacy.spyware FAQ, the FAQ didn't plagerize me, nor did I
plagerize myself (much like John Fogarty) and the timeline/record of
events has been set straight. :o)
Thank you for the kind words about my FAQ submissions, as a
reciprocal your contributions and involvement in several newsgroups
has not gone unnoticed. I, for one, appreciate the voluntary
assistance you have rendered others.

--
dak
My SpywareBlaster Custom Blocking List:
<http://customblockinglist.cjb.net/>