W97M/Prilissa" - a virus set to go off on Christmas Day - struck 10 Fortune 500 firms on three continents last week. Read more
While I'd be willing to bet that most of you build your own PCs, you might be interested in knowing that those who purchase pre-assembled computers may get nForce-enabled boxes before you have the opportunity to buy an nForce mobo. Read more
UPDATE: It took several hours for us to get the latest beta of Microsoft's Internet Explorer 7, released this morning, properly installed. But once we did, we noticed something interesting right away: Beta 3 leaves a smaller memory footprint than Firefox for the same workload, at least in preliminary tests. Read more
We compared Intel’s Atom 230 and VIA’s Nano L2100 processors hoping to find the best product for low-power applications. VIA is in the vanguard of performance. Is this enough to beat Atom? Read more
Since its release, the Killer NIC has garnered a reputation for being an extravagant and largely unnecessary add-on for the do-it-yourselfer. Seeking additional insight, we approached the card's designer. Read more
Seagate is the first hard drive vendor to offer a 1.5 TB drive in the 3.5” form factor. Meanwhile, WD sent us its RAID Edition 3 (RE3) drive. We tell you which is the best HDD choice today. Read more
The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more
Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums »
Windows 95/98/ME
»
Windows 95/98/Me General Discussion »
config.sys and autoexec.bat
| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : config.sys and autoexec.bat
|
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?) I'm looking at a friends computer and the autoexec.bat and config.sys have
|
|
Related Product
|
|
More Information
|
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?) "Andre" <~remove~azavaglia@gfrpharma.com> wrote:
|
|
More Information
|
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?) Neither file is required by Windows.
|
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?) ok, thanks for the prompt reply guys, why would the system boot to dos then?
|
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?) update: ok, i've let the scandisk run twice after typing "win" to try to
|
|
More Information
|
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?) Try running scandisk *before* starting WIN. You need to deal with the
|
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?) I was unable to run it without typing win from dos prompt because there was
|
|
More Information
|
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?) OK.
|
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?) Part of my issue with that, this is an antique compaq 5526 (kinda looks like
|
|
More Information
|
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?) Most hard drive manufacturers have diagnostic software available
|
|
More Information
|
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?) 1. Sounds to me like the HDD is FUBAR.
|
