Ad
Last Reviews & Articles

Power Supply Roundup: Part II

Published on November 07, 2008

In Part I of our power supply roundup, we went through five mainstream PSUs rated at up to 700 W. Round two sees us tackle another seven mid-range units in an effort to determine which power supply deserves your attention. Read more

Roundup: The Best Overclocking Software

Published on November 06, 2008

Interested in overclocking but not quite sure where to start? We round up some of our favorite software utilities for tweaking processors, memory, graphics, and chipsets. Read more

Tom's Holiday Buyer's Guide 2008, Part 1

Published on November 05, 2008

Welcome to the first installment in our six-part Tom's Holiday Buyer's Guide. In Part 1, two beautiful models help showcase some of our favorite no-hassle hardware gifts for 2008. Read more

Round Up: Five Powerful, Light Ultraportables

Published on November 05, 2008

Executives, road warriors, and gadget geeks all lust after ultraportable notebooks. Five of these amazing machines battle it out in this roundup. Read more

 

VNF3-250 ram still at 333

Advanced Search

There are 44 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : VNF3-250 ram still at 333
 
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.chaintech (More info?)

 

Well,I guess this is still broken in the latest BIOS. My ram speed is reported
at 333(plus overclock) in the latest BIOS,version 3.0.The original BIOS had it
reprtd correctly,but was screwed up in other ways.I'm going to e-mail Chaintech
about it,but I'm sure they already know.Anyone else having this problem?

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.chaintech (More info?)

 

In article <20041122164657.06022.00000588@mb-m21.aol.com>,
yanquidawg@aol.com says...
> Well,I guess this is still broken in the latest BIOS. My ram speed is reported
> at 333(plus overclock) in the latest BIOS,version 3.0.The original BIOS had it
> reprtd correctly,but was screwed up in other ways.I'm going to e-mail Chaintech
> about it,but I'm sure they already know.Anyone else having this problem?
>

You're using PC3200 ram and have the ram speed set to Auto
in the Bios? That's how it works on mine to get the ram
running at 400.

Bill

Ed
Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.chaintech (More info?)

 

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:01:04 -0800, Bill
<spamtrap@tinlc.cumbercartel.com> wrote:

>In article <20041122164657.06022.00000588@mb-m21.aol.com>,
>yanquidawg@aol.com says...
>> Well,I guess this is still broken in the latest BIOS. My ram speed is reported
>> at 333(plus overclock) in the latest BIOS,version 3.0.The original BIOS had it
>> reprtd correctly,but was screwed up in other ways.I'm going to e-mail Chaintech
>> about it,but I'm sure they already know.Anyone else having this problem?
>>
>
> You're using PC3200 ram and have the ram speed set to Auto
>in the Bios? That's how it works on mine to get the ram
>running at 400.
>
> Bill

Same here, just set it to Auto.

Cheers,
Ed
--
VNF3-250/2.2 @ 220x11/1.60V.
BIOS VN120A19 (10-26-2004).

Ed
Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.chaintech (More info?)

 

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:37:43 -0600, Ed <not@here.com> wrote:

correction, (had wrong date)
BIOS VN120A19 (10-19-2004)
http://www.chaintech.co.kr/sir.php [...] op=&page=1

Ed

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.chaintech (More info?)

 

Yes,but I'm using PC 3700 set to auto. There is no setting for 200. Only
100,133,166,Auto.

> You're using PC3200 ram and have the ram speed set to Auto
>in the Bios? That's how it works on mine to get the ram
>running at 400.
>
> Bill
>

Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.chaintech (More info?)

 

In article <20041123144014.21939.00001209@mb-m06.aol.com>,
yanquidawg@aol.com says...
> Yes,but I'm using PC 3700 set to auto. There is no setting for 200. Only
> 100,133,166,Auto.
>
> > You're using PC3200 ram and have the ram speed set to Auto
> >in the Bios? That's how it works on mine to get the ram
> >running at 400.
> >
> > Bill
> >
>
>
>

You're saying that PC3700, when set to Auto, runs
at 333FSB? 'Cause my PC3200 runs at 400FSB when set
to Auto.

Bill

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.chaintech (More info?)

 

>In article <20041123144014.21939.00001209@mb-m06.aol.com>,
>yanquidawg@aol.com says...
>> Yes,but I'm using PC 3700 set to auto. There is no setting for 200. Only
>> 100,133,166,Auto.

>> > You're using PC3200 ram and have the ram speed set to Auto
>> >in the Bios? That's how it works on mine to get the ram
>> >running at 400.

>
> You're saying that PC3700, when set to Auto, runs
>at 333FSB? 'Cause my PC3200 runs at 400FSB when set
>to Auto.
>

Yup.That's what I'm saying. I tried all different mem settings and so far it's
telling me it's running at 363.I have the overclock set to 218 FSB.It should be
telling me 436,right?

Ed
Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.chaintech (More info?)

 

On 24 Nov 2004 18:03:00 GMT, yanquidawg@aol.com (YanquiDawg) wrote:

>
>>In article <20041123144014.21939.00001209@mb-m06.aol.com>,
>>yanquidawg@aol.com says...
>>> Yes,but I'm using PC 3700 set to auto. There is no setting for 200. Only
>>> 100,133,166,Auto.
>
>>> > You're using PC3200 ram and have the ram speed set to Auto
>>> >in the Bios? That's how it works on mine to get the ram
>>> >running at 400.
>
>>
>> You're saying that PC3700, when set to Auto, runs
>>at 333FSB? 'Cause my PC3200 runs at 400FSB when set
>>to Auto.
>>
>
>Yup.That's what I'm saying. I tried all different mem settings and so far it's
>telling me it's running at 363.I have the overclock set to 218 FSB.It should be
>telling me 436,right?

Are you running 3 sticks of ram? I could only get DDR 333 with 3 sticks.

Ed
--
2x512 Crucial PC4000 @ DDR 440

Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.chaintech (More info?)

 

In article <20041124130300.07908.00001146@mb-m07.aol.com>,
yanquidawg@aol.com says...
>
> >In article <20041123144014.21939.00001209@mb-m06.aol.com>,
> >yanquidawg@aol.com says...
> >> Yes,but I'm using PC 3700 set to auto. There is no setting for 200. Only
> >> 100,133,166,Auto.
>
> >> > You're using PC3200 ram and have the ram speed set to Auto
> >> >in the Bios? That's how it works on mine to get the ram
> >> >running at 400.
>
> >
> > You're saying that PC3700, when set to Auto, runs
> >at 333FSB? 'Cause my PC3200 runs at 400FSB when set
> >to Auto.
> >
>
> Yup.That's what I'm saying. I tried all different mem settings and so far it's
> telling me it's running at 363.I have the overclock set to 218 FSB.It should be
> telling me 436,right?
>
>

Yes. That sux. Have you tried it with just a single stick?

Bill

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.chaintech (More info?)

 

Only one 512M stick.

>>Yup.That's what I'm saying. I tried all different mem settings and so far
>it's
>>telling me it's running at 363.I have the overclock set to 218 FSB.It should
>be
>>telling me 436,right?
>
>Are you running 3 sticks of ram? I could only get DDR 333 with 3 sticks.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.chaintech (More info?)

 

"YanquiDawg" <yanquidawg@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041122164657.06022.00000588@mb-m21.aol.com...
> Well,I guess this is still broken in the latest BIOS. My ram speed is
> reported
> at 333(plus overclock) in the latest BIOS,version 3.0.The original BIOS
> had it
> reprtd correctly,but was screwed up in other ways.I'm going to e-mail
> Chaintech
> about it,but I'm sure they already know.Anyone else having this problem?


what was "screwed up in other ways" ?

just put together the vnf3-250 with amd 64 2800+ with 2 x 512m corsair xms
and it is
running at 400.


john

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.chaintech (More info?)

 

The original bios(1.0) reported temps in the negative. It also had a few
features missing.

>what was "screwed up in other ways" ?
>
>just put together the vnf3-250 with amd 64 2800+ with 2 x 512m corsair xms
>and it is
>running at 400.

Ed
Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.chaintech (More info?)

 

On 06 Dec 2004 19:59:46 GMT, yanquidawg@aol.com (YanquiDawg) wrote:

>The original bios(1.0) reported temps in the negative. It also had a few
>features missing.

negative temps lol!
How much did it go up with newer bios?

I'm running 3200+ Newcastle with the VN120A19 BIOS (10-26-04) and it
fixed an incompatibility I had with a NEC 8x DVDRW and a 48x AOPEN CDRW,
but my CPU temp is +20C with any BIOS newer then 1.0 and Cool n Quite
still makes the PC lockup!, runs great otherwise. :)

Ed



Go to:
 

Google ads