Impressions From Our Benchmark Tests
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: first, benchmarks, conroe, vs, fx, 62, uk
Impressions From Our Benchmark Tests

Lame benchmark run-through on the Conroe platform

Lame, dual core version

3DMark displays information about the CPU
Summary And Conclusions
Again, we must emphasize that our testing situation was not optimal, because the Intel system had been preconfigured and didn't represent the final version. Even so, we were able to determine that not even AMD's top-of-the-line Athlon FX-62 CPU running at 3.0 GHz could clearly best the pre-release model of the Core 2 Duo (2.66 GHz Conroe) processor we tested. This comparison didn't even use the top-of-the-line Conroe processor, which Intel plans to introduce soon.
But how fast and powerful will Intel's new processor technology prove to be in practice? This is something we can only answer with some certainty after we've had a chance to test it ourselves in our own labs. In the meantime, it looks like AMD's going to have to get to work in order to keep up with Intel!
- Previous page Synthetic Benchmarks
- AM2: AMD Reinvents Itself
- A 4.1 GHz Dual Core at £79.95 - Can it be True?
- Dual Core Intel Processors For Low-Power, High-Performance Desktops
- Spring 2006 Interactive CPU Charts Update
- Pentium EE Squeezes 3.73 GHz Out of NetBurst
- A Look At AMD's Socket AM2 Platform
- Will Core Duo Notebooks Trade Battery Life For Quicker Response?
- Intel drops "Pentium" brand
- AMD Athlon FX-60's Dual-Core Assault
- The 65 nm Pentium D 900's Coming Out Party