Firefox Getting GPU Acceleration, Maybe Before IE9
Soon your GPU can flex its muscles while you're surfing too.
Last week, when Microsoft gave its preview of Internet Explorer 9 at Professional Developers Conference, it showed the upcoming browser's GPU-accelerated rendering capabilities.
President of Microsoft's Windows and Windows Live division Steven Sinofsky showed that IE8 can render Bing maps at 14 frames per second. With hardware acceleration in IE9 turned on, he got 60 frames per second -- impressive, indeed.
Microsoft isn't the only one thinking of leveraging GPU involvement for browser performance boosts, however, as Mozilla has been cooking up something similar in its kitchen too.
On the day of Microsoft's IE9 demo, Mozilla evangelist Chris Blizzard tweeted, "Interesting that we're doing Direct2D support in Firefox as well - I'll bet we'll ship it first. :)"
While neither Microsoft nor Mozilla have committed to any ship date for its hardware-accelerated browsers, Firefox developer Bas Schouten wrote about his work on DirectWrite and Direct2D.
"A while ago I started my investigation into Direct2D usage in firefox (see bug 527707). Since then we've made significant progress and are now able to present a Firefox browser completely rendered using Direct2D, making intensive usage of the GPU (this includes the UI, menu bars, etc.)," he wrote. "I won't be showing any screenshots, since it is not supposed to look much different. But I will be sharing some technical details, first performance indications and a test build for those of you running Windows 7 or an updated version of Vista!"
His opinion on Windows 7 aside, Schouten presented benchmarks comparing Direct2D rendering compared to Windows' Graphics Device Interface (GDI) rendering as tested on an Intel Core i7 920 system with an ATI Radeon HD 4850 GPU.
Follow us on Twitter for more tech news and exclusive updates here.
- firefox ,
- gpu ,
- acceleration ,
- dx11
- Windows 7 SD Card Corruption Flaw Patched
- Windows 7 Usage Passes All Versions of Mac OS X
- Chrome OS Benchmarked Against Moblin, Ubuntu
- Skill Trees Removed From Diablo III
- OS Xbox Pro Mod: Four HDDs, Windows 7, OS X
- Tuesday Deals: Pre-Black Friday Edition Part Deux
- Core i9 Engineering Sample Shows 6-Core Power
- Millions Using Xbox Live's Social Media Features
- Microsoft Delays Releasing Open Source Win 7 Tool
- QOTD: What Will You Buy For Black Friday?
- Alienware Rigs Have Steam, Portal Pre-Installed
- Deals: Black Friday Finale Special
- Intel Roadmap Leaked, Shows Core i3, i5 Info
- Forget Black Friday, It's Cyber Monday
- Latest MS Patches Cause Black Screen of Death
- 2,500 Players Banned From Cheating in MW2
- Deals: Cyber Monday Special Offers
- Buffalo Unleashes USB 3.0 Blu-ray Burner
I approve of this. I would like to see also PDF reading software with hardware acceleration. Those things piss me off sometimes.
+1
Anyone know what the little H things are at the end of the longest bars? (anything over 10ms)
Upper and lower bounds I think. i.e. 11ms +/- 0.1ms
Pointless - who the hell can tell whether something was display 5ms faster. I can just imagine the HUGE marketing campaigns by all the brower providers now - "Over a year you could say several minutes!".
Does anybody know if Firefox will support GPU acceleration on Linux ? Why didn't they implement the GPU accelleration with OpenGL ?
Couldn't they have included Tom's Hardware in the rendering time test?
You know what? For some reason I love stories about firefox. No idea why!
You know what? For some reason I love stories about firefox. No idea why!
They do have an advantage over most - I think there's an IE equivalent though?
I wonder if the hardware acceleration would be optional and if there'd be much of a temperature / power change through having the GPU working as well as / instead of the CPU - particularly on the page loading time side where noone can see the difference rather than on apps where a frame rate change could possibly be relevant.