DRAM Settings
All tests were conducted using Super Talent’s DDR3-1600 at 2.00 volts.
Though the highest memory speeds often benefit synthetic memory benchmarks, the best program performance often comes from lower frequencies at reduced latencies.
We found Super Talent’s DDR3-1600 perfectly capable of reaching CAS 4.0 (4-4-4 timings) using a slower 1066 MHz data rate, and for the sake of comparison chose a 12-cycle tRAS setting to match the timings previously used with our DDR2-1066 samples. This setting was used as the "baseline" for testing the Core 2 Duo E6750 at its stock 2.66 GHz clock rate, as well as testing the Core 2 Extreme QX6850 at both its stock 3.00 GHz (9x 333 MHz) clock rate and at an E6750-matching 2.66 GHz (8x 333 MHz).

In order to take the E6750 to 3.00 GHz, we needed to raise its bus speed. Leaving the RAM at the same FSB to DRAM ratio as above pushed its data rate to 1200 MHz, which also required loosening its timings to 5-4-4. Moving away from the clock-for-clock comparison to DDR2 RAM allowed us to drop its tRAS to 8 cycles.

Because the Core 2 Extreme QX6850 required a higher multiplier and lower bus speed to reach its highest core clock speed, leaving its FSB:DRAM ratio at 5:8 only required loosening its timings slightly.

Meanwhile, the Core 2 Duo E6750’s low 8x maximum CPU multiplier required a super high bus speed with a lower 2:3 FSB:DRAM ratio to maintain reasonably-short latency settings.

Latest CPU News
- 10/02 – CPU Performance Boosted 20% When CPU, GPU Collaborate
- 10/02 – Leaked Slide Shows Intel Haswell Set for March-June 2013
- 09/02 – $100,000 If You Can Prove Quantum Computers Impossible
- 09/02 – AMD Adds FM1 CPUs Athlon II X4 638 and Athlon II X4 641
- 08/02 – Raspberry Pi Scheduled to Launch This Month
Er, it might just be me, but where are the piccies??
haha, i dont see them either
Try disabling your adblock plus if ur using firefox. Others disable any ad blocker
Can anyone still not see them? They seem to be alright now...
Like many flight sim enthusiasts, I am trying to decide the most cost-effective CPU for FSX SP1. This can use multi-cores we're told but reports suggest not that well.
Could you add FSX SP1 (under Vista) to your benchmarks for CPUs please? I am particularly interested to know whether the E6850 is better than the Q6600 or not!