Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Conclusion

by

While the transfer rate results were limited by our Areca controller, it is obvious that to determine the transfer speed of a RAID 0 array, you can almost add the maximum transfer speed of all the hard drives and subtract some 10-15% overhead on controllers optimized for throughput. While the conventional drives will lose performance once you start filling them up, flash SSDs will always maintain their bandwidth.

However, throughput isn’t the most important aspect for enterprise hard drives. In fact, large enterprises often rely on maximum transaction and I/O performance for their servers. Think of banks, Web service providers, and other server-bound applications.

We would have liked to keep some of the MemoRight Flash SSDs for our systems, but we had to return them to SSDWorld in Switzerland. Thanks for providing the test samples!

While the hardware environment opposes the main bottleneck for complex RAID configurations, especially RAID 6 and RAID 5, the flash SSDs were able to increasingly show their muscles with less complex array types. I/O performance in RAID 0 is between 5x and 20x faster on MemoRight flash SSDs than on Seagate Cheetah 15K.5 drives. In RAID 5 and RAID 6, the performance benefit is still between 50% more and several times more I/O operations per second.

ROI Great for Enterprises

Obviously, MemoRight flash SSDs are still a rather expensive affair at roughly $1,800 for the 64 GB model we received for this review. Compared to about $150 for the 73 GB version of the Cheetah 15K.5, this equals 12 times the cost. Is this really worth it?

For enterprises looking for maximum transaction performance, an investment of $10,000 to $20,000 will be worthwhile if transaction and business processes are accelerated. In the end, a 4x to 20x improvement in I/O performance hasn’t happened with conventional hard drives in the past, and it never will happen.

Other Customers, Hold Your Fire

Everyone else should hold off on enterprise SSD investments unless there is a specific business case demanding it—for example, a database server for a high-traffic website. Consider that if you can buy a single server and three or four Flash SSDs instead of eight to 12 hard drives spread between two servers, the flash SSDs might more cost effective, while still providing better I/O performance.

Our results make it very obvious that the era of conventional enterprise hard drives will come to an end within the next few years. Lower cost, higher capacity drives will take over the segment, and flash-based hard drives will overrun the enterprise space, starting at the high-end and making their way down to the business mainstream as prices decline.

Share:
4
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
leexgx 19/07/2008 06:36
Hide
-1+

whats with makeing the PNG files so small so that we have click on each one to see the results

please make them norm size so we do not Need to click on them
put them back to the size thay should be not makeing them smaller by 50% wasteing click time (there not even bigger when you press the print button so makes very anoying)

pickie 21/07/2008 20:43
Hide
-0+

since the takeover of toms its just gone downhill and keeps going :( sad cos it was one of the best sites

Anonymous 22/07/2008 20:28
Hide
-0+

I agree in having the images larger. As they are an important part of the review, why make them so clumsily awailable?
Cheers,
Webtroll

extremetaz 01/08/2008 10:58
Hide
-0+

agreed - who came up with this "click on the image" rubbish???

Best offers

Newsletters


OK