MainConcept 1.3
Table of content:
MainConcept 1.3
Ad
In MPEG-2 encoding of DV video, both dual systems manage a boost in performance of 18.8 percent over the fastest P4 - and that's not exactly brilliant performance. The two Xeon systems differ by 1.7 percent - once again, the 1-MB L3 cache is barely noticeable. Based on the fastest dual Xeon system, a data quantity of 7.5 MB/s is processed.
Pinnacle Studio 8.5
It's a different story with the Pinnacle benchmark: Without the L3 cache, the dual Xeon system is slower than the P4 with 3.2 GHz. On the other hand, the dual Xeon with the L3 cache benefits from improved memory performance and gains 18.1 percent.
- Previous page SPECviewperf 7.1
- Next page PC Mark 2002
Google Ads
The CPU Articles and reviews
- Bidding Adieu: P4 3.2 vs. Athlon XP 3200+
- High-Flying: AMD Athlon XP 3200+ Squares Off Against Intel P4 3 GHz
- Barton's Here: Athlon XP 3000+ vs. P4 3.06 GHz
- Single CPU in Dual Operation: P4 3.06 GHz with Hyper-Threading...
- The New Generation Is Here: Celeron 2.0 GHz, with 0.13 µm
- AMD Travels Through Time: Athlon XP 2800+ with Dual-DDR
- Battling Brothers: Celeron vs. Pentium 4
- Speed Isn't Everything: P4/2800 Meets Athlon XP 2600+
- At The Last Second: AMD's Trump Card - The Athlon XP 2600+
- Accelerating Celeron: Available At 1.8 GHz Now
Related Content
