Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

CryENGINE 3, Crysis 2 to Feature Full 3D Support

by - source: Tom's Hardware US

Yes, I believe it's safe to say that it can run Crysis.

At CES we learned that 3D displays are all the rage now. While content producers have yet to create the entertainment that we will be viewing on shiny new 3D TVs, the likes of James Cameron's Avatar and support from upcoming PlayStation 3 firmware updates will help pave the way.

Crytek this week announced that its CryENGINE 3 will support stereoscopic 3D (S-3D) and will be demonstrated at this year’s GDC expo in San Francisco on March 11 to 13.

“After the successful introduction of CryENGINE 3 at last year’s GDC, we are really excited to show the latest version of our all-in-one game development solution this year in stereoscopic 3D. Over the past few years, S-3D technology has emerged as one of the key trends both in movies and games. With CryENGINE 3, developers will have the ability to create their content in 3D on all platforms. There are basically no longer any limits to a designer’s creativity. CryENGINE 3 features many innovations to accelerate development, cut production costs and ensure teams are able to maximize their own creativity without delays,” says Carl Jones, Director of Global Business Development CryENGINE.

This will open the door for any other developer using CryENGINE 3 to introduce 3D support into its PC, Xbox 360 or PS3 game.

Share:
9
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
roots 03/03/2010 02:10
Hide
-8+

Awsome and in 10 years we will have pc's that we can play CryEngine 3 games on in 3D :D

longerlife 03/03/2010 07:27
Hide
-2+

Actually the PC is WAY ahead of the consoles in terms of 3D support, in fact you can already play the original Crysis in stereoscopic 3D, as well as HUNDREDS of other games and practically every game that comes out.

In fact I have tried it and it works quite well (in Crysis, the water reflections and clouds are at the wrong depths) but it is pretty intense...

Herr_Koos 03/03/2010 08:47
Hide
-2+

I think what roots is getting at, is that yes, it will work, but you'll get 5-10 fps...

Anonymous 03/03/2010 12:16
Hide
-2+

If it is not going to work on PC it will never work on console

david__t 03/03/2010 14:02
Hide
-2+

People rightly jokes about the Crysis Engines - perhaps they should focus on an engine that scales well rather than one that needs a £10k PC to run. If PCs even now cannot run Crysis at decent resolutions with all the eye Candy turned on then that is not amazing graphics, it is poor programming.

trooth 03/03/2010 15:11
Hide
--2+

Poor optimisation, not necessarily the same thing as bad programming.

Clintonio 03/03/2010 17:16
Hide
-3+

trooth :
Poor optimisation, not necessarily the same thing as bad programming.



It is actually. Optimising your code is a part of good programming. As a programmer I kind of know that any slow processing in my code is sloppy coding on my behalf. Afterall, programming is more than just writing the code, it's designing it for efficiency and a bunch of other desired aspects including security and the purpose it is being made for.

I put the inefficiency solely on the developers.

trooth 03/03/2010 19:45
Hide
-0+

Here we'll have to disagree.

There is a balance of time between optimising your program and getting it shipped. As a programmer, I would love to be able to spend as long as I liked getting a project finished, but time is a commodity and has been since...well pretty much always.

Look at Valve, everybody's favourite goto as an example of optimising done right. Yet those who use that example ignore the very business/development cycle Valve promised with the introduction episodic gaming, which lies in ruins.

jenesuispasbavard 04/03/2010 18:16
Hide
-0+

They really need to make Cryengine more efficient. My laptop that I bought in October 2009 (with a GTX 260M) still can't run a game from 2007 at max settings...

Best offers

Newsletters


OK