Power Consumption, Noise Levels and Temperatures
Ad
The power consumption in watts refers to the entire test platform. The 2D value is measured for the normal Windows interface without load (minimum value). The 3D value is measured when the graphics card and the CPU are running at maximum 3D load (maximum value).
| Temperature | 2D degree (Vista Desktop) | 3D degree (BlackSite) |
|---|---|---|
| Geforce 9800 GTX (512 MB) | 59 | 74 |
| Geforce 9600 GT OC (1024 MB) | 43 | 69 |
| Geforce 8800 GTS OC (512 MB) | 61 | 87 |
| Geforce 8800 GT OC (512 MB) | 61 | 96 |
| Geforce 7950 GT (512 MB) | 49 | 71 |
| Geforce 6800 GT (256 MB) | 60 | 79 |
| Power Consumption | 2D watts (Vista Desktop) | 3D watts (BlackSite) |
|---|---|---|
| Geforce 9800 GTX (512 MB) E2160@1.8 | 122 | 226 |
| Geforce 9600 GT OC (1024 MB) E2160@1.8 | 93 | 155 |
| Geforce 8800 GTS OC (512 MB) E2160@1.8 | 119 | 232 |
| Geforce 8800 GT OC (512 MB) E2160@1.8 | 108 | 200 |
| Geforce 7950 GT (512 MB) E2160@1.8 | 84 | 140 |
| Geforce 6800 GT (256 MB) E2160@1.8 | 105 | 151 |
| Geforce 9800 GTX (512 MB) E2160@2.41 | 121 | 236 |
| Geforce 9600 GT OC (1024 MB) E2160@2.41 | 95 | 161 |
| Geforce 8800 GTS OC (512 MB) E2160@2.41 | 122 | 238 |
| Geforce 8800 GT OC (512 MB) E2160@2.41 | 112 | 209 |
| Geforce 7950 GT (512 MB) E2160@2.41 | 88 | 148 |
| Geforce 6800 GT (256 MB) E2160@2.41 | 107 | 157 |
| Geforce 9800 GTX (512 MB) E6750@2.67 | 129 | 246 |
| Geforce 9600 GT OC (1024 MB) E6750@2.67 | 98 | 170 |
| Geforce 8800 GTS OC (512 MB) E6750@2.67 | 121 | 248 |
| Geforce 8800 GT OC (512 MB) E6750@2.67 | 109 | 221 |
| Geforce 7950 GT (512 MB) E6750@2.67 | 92 | 154 |
| Geforce 6800 GT (256 MB) E6750@2.67 | 109 | 165 |
| Geforce 9800 GTX (512 MB) Q6600@2.4 | 143 | 266 |
| Geforce 9600 GT OC (1024 MB) Q6600@2.4 | 113 | 190 |
| Geforce 8800 GTS OC (512 MB) Q6600@2.4 | 136 | 272 |
| Geforce 8800 GT OC (512 MB) Q6600@2.4 | 126 | 242 |
| Geforce 7950 GT (512 MB) Q6600@2.4 | 107 | 175 |
| Geforce 6800 GT (256 MB) Q6600@2.4 | 124 | 182 |
| Geforce 9800 GTX (512 MB) Q6600@3.2 | 158 | 296 |
| Geforce 9600 GT OC (1024 MB) Q6600@3.2 | 129 | 222 |
| Geforce 8800 GTS OC (512 MB) Q6600@3.2 | 156 | 300 |
| Geforce 8800 GT OC (512 MB) Q6600@3.2 | 146 | 272 |
| Geforce 7950 GT (512 MB) Q6600@3.2 | 124 | 205 |
| Geforce 6800 GT (256 MB) Q6600@3.2 | 140 | 211 |
| Geforce 9800 GTX (512 MB) X6800EE@2.94 | 140 | 264 |
| Geforce 9600 GT OC (1024 MB) X6800EE@2.94 | 109 | 185 |
| Geforce 8800 GTS OC (512 MB) X6800EE@2.94 | 134 | 264 |
| Geforce 8800 GT OC (512 MB) X6800EE@2.94 | 122 | 233 |
| Geforce 7950 GT (512 MB) X6800EE@2.94 | 105 | 173 |
| Geforce 6800 GT (256 MB) X6800EE@2.94 | 122 | 179 |
| Noise Level | 2D dB(A) | 3D dB(A) |
|---|---|---|
| Geforce 9800 GTX (512 MB) | 37.0 | 44.6-45.2 |
| Geforce 9600 GT OC (1024 MB) | 37.1 | 41.1-42.3 |
| Geforce 8800 GTS OC (512 MB) | 36.5 | 39.6 |
| Geforce 8800 GT OC (512 MB) | 36.8 | 40.5 |
| Geforce 7950 GT (512 MB) | 41.6 | 49.1 |
| Geforce 6800 GT (256 MB) | 42.9 | 43.2 |
- Previous page Overall Performance and Price Comparison
- Next page Overall Energy Consumption and Energy...
Google Ads
The Graphics Cards Articles and reviews
- NForce 780a SLI Debuts Hybrid SLI
- How To Overclock Your Graphics Card
- PCI Express 2.0 Graphics Cards: How Much Extra Performance Do They...
- Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX Review
- Nvidia GeForce 9800 GX2 Review
- The Best Gaming Graphics cards for Your Money: March 2008
- Nvidia's GeForce 9600 GT Reviewed
- Fresh from Canada - ATI's Radeon HD 3450 and HD 3650
- The Best Gaming Graphics Cards for Your Money: February 2008
- ATI R680: the Rage Fury MAXX 2?
The entry level cpu in a series have almost as much overclock potetial as a high end one, sometimes even more due to fsb clock.
The most bang for the buck is to had with a entry level cpu in a current series opverclocked, combined with the best grahics card in your budget (save money on cpu and put it towards gpu)
E.G. If someone has a 8600GT and a low spec CPU, it makes no sense to buy a new graphics card as this review coroborates the relation between GPU AND CPU.
Great stuff Tom's.
Also, Mackayde, the fact that you said 'coroborates' makes my point for me - this is ground already covered - we all know that mid range goes with mid range etc... for the best bang for the buck & price/performance ratio.
Err, of course you can make the bus speed faster by overclocking. What THG is suggesting is that the hit you get from using a cheaper CPU (i.e. less cache, lower bus speeds) can generally be dialled out by overclocking the CPU to death. i.e. run 3DMark on both, I bet you can easily get the same of better results from a lower prices CPU and many of the premium units.