Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Benchmark Results: Synthetics

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value
By

3DMark scores are based on GPU power and features, but haven’t reflected gaming performance for a while. Nvidia’s high theoretical performance and support for PhysX typically trumps the real-world performance of AMD’s solutions in these tests, and we expect big scores from our 3-way SLI-equipped rig.

3DMark didn’t let us down in expectations, putting the triple GTX 260 Core 216 graphics processors of our $2,500 PC far ahead of the dual HD 4850 graphics cores of the $1,250 build. Because synthetic benchmark scores don’t represent the performance of any actual programs, we no longer use synthetics in our final assessment.

PCMark shows its preference for the single drive of our $1,250 PC over the software RAID 5 of the $2,500 version and for good reason–software RAID 5, while practical for preserving data and daily use, is not an optimal-performance solution.

Both the $1,250 and $2,500 machines used the same Core i7 920 processor, and Sandra’s CPU tests reflect nothing more than the clock speed difference. The EVGA motherboard of our $2,500 PC underclocks the CPU slightly at default settings, while the same system’s larger cooler allows for a higher overclock.

Core i7 on-die memory control provides huge gains in Sandra Bandwidth, while the $2,500 system’s fast DDR3-1333 memory outshines the DDR3-1066 of our $1,250 PC.

Display all 4 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , 2 January 2009 14:42
    Yeah, I'm always quite interested to see an "Elite-enthusiast" build. There's no way I could ever afford to buy one, but it's good to see what the very best performance possible is.

    You should try to get the highest possible 3D Mark or something, and then write articles about how you set about doing it. It'd keep me coming back to see how the project's unfolding :) 
  • 1 Hide
    goozaymunanos , 3 January 2009 22:34
    the lower end is the most important, imo.

    that catches the most people. esp in these times..?

    i'd say even try a cheaper pc than the 650 one!

    cheers,
    bill

    p.s. stuff and nonsense: http://www.eupeople.net/forum
  • 0 Hide
    Matthew , 6 January 2009 02:32
    Nice reviews. I hope next month you do something with the new AMD Phenom 2's if there out and maybe the quad core 2 series for us mid range price people that want a quad core without the expense of a i7 ;) 
  • 0 Hide
    HyperDawn , 11 January 2009 03:38
    Good review. With the coming of the Phenom II I think it would be very interesting to see how AMD and Intel compare on at least the value and mid systems, perhaps have a 5-6 system lineup with offerings from both? :)