Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Intel Core i7-975 Extreme And i7-950 Reviewed

Intel Core i7-975 Extreme And i7-950 Reviewed
By

Intel doesn’t need to launch a pair of new CPUs today. Its thousand dollar Core i7-965 Extreme is already the fastest chip out there by a comfortable margin. Its five hundred-something dollar Core i7-940 slides into second place without an issue. And the company’s entry-level Core i7, the 920, is reasonably priced to the point where it fits into our $1,300 System Builder Marathon parts list (and of course, it also helps that the 2.66 GHz chip approaches 4 GHz with some regularity).

Nevertheless, the company is taking advantage of Computex to launch a pair of fresh Core i7s—the 975 Extreme and the 950. Given their names, you’d think that these newcomers would fall into place on either side of the i7-965. But that’s not the plan at all. Instead, Intel says the i7-975 Extreme will replace the 965 at its exorbitant $1,000 price point and the i7-950 will replace the 940 at $562.

For the time being, 940s will probably float around in the channel at reduced prices. But with i7-920s still the overclocking darlings for less than $300, even a discounted i7-940 would still cost more than we’d be otherwise willing to pay for it.

i7-920, i7-965, and i7-975

Things Change / Stay The Same

The last time we reviewed a Core i7 processor was the Nehalem architecture’s launch in November of last year. Back then, the infrastructure supporting i7 was decidedly high-end. A handful of $300-$400 motherboards were pretty much it, and 1.65V DDR3 triple-channel memory kits were still brand new.

Fortunately, much has changed. There are at least four X58-based motherboards selling for less than $200. Six gigabyte DDR3 memory kits are selling for well under $100 now. And even the entry-level (for the i7 family, that is) 920 has dropped a bit down to $279. Of course, those price points only matter if you’re in the market for Core i7 as cheap as you can find it.

Core i7-975 Extreme and Core i7-950 are not in the same category. The i7-975, specifically, is for the enthusiast who wants a guaranteed 3.3 GHz+ clock rate, to know he’s getting the D0 stepping, and doesn’t mind shelling out the same $999 that, yesterday, would have bought a 3.2 GHz i7-965 Extreme.

The i7-950 puts 133 MHz on its predecessor, but still remains the middle-child. At $562, the i7-950 costs $280 more than the i7-920 and runs well within reach of every 920 overclock we’ve ever seen—even the retail chips that have come through our lab. Thus, we’re not going to spend a ton of time on the i7-950 (though you will see it in all of the benchmark charts).

There are 18 Comments.
Other Comments
  • 2
    papalarge123 , June 4, 2009 3:55 AM
    from what i have seen in all of the benchies from the past 6+ months, is that if u have an overclocked Core 2 Quad @ 3.6+, and u are mainly using the system for gaming, then i can not see the reason to upgrade to the i7 at this precise moment.

    i agree that if u r due an upgrade from an old x2 on an obsolete 939 board or an intel 775 board that doesnt support quads, then the i7 is a tasty bit of kit, but if u have an am2+ board or even an intel board that can take the latest quads in the core 2 range and mainly play games, then the i7 is a waste of money no matter how cheap and powerfull the lowest 920 is.
  • 1
    Reynod , June 5, 2009 4:48 PM
    You can't spin this anyway other than down.

    It is a hugely overpriced and underperforming dog of a chip that has to be cooked a few millivolts higher just to run under load.

    It runs hotter (at idle and under load), and actually performs less than a 965 under most benchmarks.

    Why ??

    I think it is lower quality silicon that has been repackaged so that Intel can extract the maximum bang for the buck - it might be D0 but it is certainly not the best silicon ... or it would run at comparable or lower voltage than the 965.

    A wise purchase for an gamer would be to get a core2quad or phenom II, or possibly an i7920 and overclock them.

    Only an idiot would buy a 975.

    Check the other reviews.

    Obviously i7 does not scale as well as core2 or Phenom II ... certainly the case for gaming.

    130 Watts my ar$e ... more like 140 Watts.

    Shame on you Spintel for thinking you can rip us off !!

  • 0
    krenar41 , December 4, 2009 10:11 PM
    core i7 are expensive and not necessary.AMD platforms are the best cheap and fast enough