Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Does Turbo Boost Help Or Hurt Core i5/i7's Power Efficiency?

by
Table of contents

Intel’s new LGA 1156-based processors, namely the Core i5-700- and Core i7-800-series, arrived with a bang. Our launch article by Chris Angelini provides all the key information. But, in short, the new processor delivers increased performance compared to Core 2 Quad. No surprise there. But Intel also claims that power consumption went down significantly, so we decided to tackle this prospect with a closer look.

Core i5, i7: Intel’s new processors for LGA 1156.

The Core i5 Innovation

The new P55 platform and Intel’s Lynnfield processors make a are impressive enough from a performance angle, but I’d like to look at the facts from a different perspective. The platform’s foundation still centers on the Nehalem architecture first seen as Core i7 for LGA 1366 late last year, hence the level of innovation in Lynnfield is less revolutionary and more of an evolution. 

Intel is great at tweaking, though. From a technology standpoint, Core i5 incorporates a lot more integration, stepping closer to the inevitable SoC (system-on-chip) future by adding PCI Express onto the die. A more aggressive implementation of Turbo Boost adds extra performance for non-threaded applications. Considering that Intel plans to integrate graphics with Clarkdale in coming months, this step could also be looked at as a necessity. Improved Turbo Boost is another building block for turning dynamic overclocking into a real feature. In reality, though, the large motherboard makers have been offering similar features for a few years already.

I see two main benefits of the new LGA 1156 processors for buyers. First, you have decreased power consumption thanks to the integrated memory controller and PCI Express 2.0 interface. The second benefit is performance. Turbo Boost helps to elevate LGA 1156-based parts to Core i7-900-class performance levels in certain applications. Both benefits became obvious in our article, Intel’s Mainstream Magnum Opus.

Performance Increase Where It's Needed

The current generation of Turbo Boost accelerates a single core by four 133 MHz increments (or bins) in the case of Core i5-700-series and by as many as five increments for the Core i7-800-series. This equals clock speed bumps of 533 and 667 MHz. Two cores can accelerate by four clock speed increments, while three and four cores still may receive a simultaneous 133 MHz boost (up to 266 MHz for the top model Core i7-860). Obviously, the new chips operate with higher power consumption every time Turbo Boost kicks in, though they're kept under a 95W ceiling by Intel's on-die Power Control Unit.

Power Down?

We want to answer some basic questions: What is the real reduction in system power consumption compared to Core 2 Quad platforms? What is the efficiency (performance per watt) for the new LGA 1156 generation? What’s the difference in efficiency for a LGA 1156 system with and without Turbo Boost enabled?

Share:
1
Comment
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
Anonymous 23/10/2009 09:49
Hide
-0+

Nice article. My next CPU will probably be an Athlon2 X4 or Core i5 depending on my budget. As for GPU, I probably won't buy anything less than an ATI 5850... Ah well, just saving cash for now, maybe when the economy is better I will splurge a bit on PC components.

Resident Evil 5 runs great on my Athlon X2 7750 OC'ed 3ghz, ATI 4830 512MB OC'ed 700mhz clock. At 1920x1080p 2xAA...

Given next year will be a lot of console titles, which are less demanding than "pure" PC titles like Stalker... I could hang on for another 6 months. Ah well, we'll see...

Best offers

Newsletters


OK