Intel Core i5-750S: Since When Does The S Mean Slow?
Table of contents
- 1. Core i5-750S: What Does The S Stand For?
- 2. Core i7-750S: 82W TDP
- 3. CPU-Z Screenshots
- 4. Test Setup And Components
The Core i5-750S is a low-power version of a CPU we often recommend as a solid value for the gamer on a budget: the popular Core i5-750 quad-core, based on Intel's Lynnfield design and widely regarded as a potent overclocker. The S-suffix that represented low-power models is now being used on a processor that, as expected, drops power from the i5's standard 95W TDP. However, it only does so at decreased performance. Is Intel starting to taper off performance in order to hit its lower power consumption figures?
The Intel S Processors
We reviewed the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200S and Q9550S processors almost a year ago, and they delivered expected levels of performance at decreased idle power and, more importantly, at clearly decreased peak power. What had previously required a 95W thermal envelope fit into a 65W frame with the S-series. The only disadvantage was monetary. For most users, the S might as well have stood for "Soooo expensive!"
A New Kind of S?
While the Core 2 Quad S-models had identical clock speeds and performance as their mainstream siblings, only differing in voltage settings and power consumption, Intel has released an S-model processor that reaches its power savings through performance reduction.
The Core i5-750S does not run at the same 2.66 GHz nominal clock speed as the regular Core i5-750. Instead, the chip is limited to 2.4 GHz. Moreover, there's another drawback with Turbo Boost technology, a key advantage of the Core i5/i7 processors over their predecessors. The i5-750S will not increase the core clock speed for all four cores at all, limiting performance in well-threaded applications, although it still switches to as much as 3.2 GHz for one or two cores.
We compared the Core i5-750 and i5-750S, analyzing their performance, power consumption, and efficiency. This time, the results are less impressive that usual.
Latest CPU News
- 10/02 – CPU Performance Boosted 20% When CPU, GPU Collaborate
- 10/02 – Leaked Slide Shows Intel Haswell Set for March-June 2013
- 09/02 – $100,000 If You Can Prove Quantum Computers Impossible
- 09/02 – AMD Adds FM1 CPUs Athlon II X4 638 and Athlon II X4 641
- 08/02 – Raspberry Pi Scheduled to Launch This Month

Oh dear Intel. What have you done.
I'd like to know how it looks like when you under-clock the regular i5-750 to the reduced speed of the i5-750s. I wouldn't wonder if you could reach the same reduction in power consumption with the regular one, so that spending money on the i5-750s would be a complete waste.
The MSI website shows the correct BIOS version for a i5-750S on a P55-GD65
is 1.6.
Could the poor results be due to the tests being carried out with the earlier v1.42 BIOS?
When AMD bring out a lower power model, they adjust the numbering to match the CPU speed (if changed) as well as adding an E at the end, for example 2.6GHz 910 -> 2.5GHz 905e. Intel have effectively tried to pass this off as a more efficient 750, which is obviously wrong.
SH** ?
MWi - Probably. The catch is that Turbo Mode would bring the power dissipation back toward the original TDP, thus the mess that is i5-750s! I'd still take an i5-750 over the tripe above anyday!
Why did they even bother though? They should have done this kind of malarkey with the i5-530/i5-650/i7-860 to take advantage of the HyperThreading! Most apps or games that couldn't take advantage of HT would most likely focus on one or two cores anyway, thus triggerring Turbo Mode unless you have a ton on in the background!
/rant
Core i5 750 for a gamer on a budget? What are the lower ranked Corei5s and Corei3s for then? Is it just me or are hardware reviewers somewhat spoiled and decadent sort? I'm guessing a Radeon 5870 is a budget gaming card as well?
/rant