Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Test Settings

by

We overclocked our C0-stepping Core i7 920 to 3.80 GHz in order to assure a high thermal load with both high-performance cooling solutions, using a 200 MHz base clock and 19x core multiplier.

Test System Configuration
CPU

Intel Core i7 920 (2.66 GHz, 8.0 MB Cache)
Overclocked to 3.80 GHz (19x 200 MHz), 1.366V

CPU Cooler, Air

Cogage True Spirit at continuous 12V
140 mm fan, 1,600 RPM

CPU Cooler, Liquid

CoolIT Domino A.L.C. at continuous 12V
120 mm fan, 600-2,800 RPM

Motherboard

Asus P6T Rev. 1.01G, BIOS 0306 (02-03-2009)
LGA-1366, X58/ICH10R

RAM

Kingston KHX16000D3ULT1K3/6GX (6.0 GB)
DDR3-2000 at DDR3-1600 CAS 8-8-8-24

Graphics

Zotac GeForce GTX260² 896MB
576/999MHz GPU/Shader, GDDR3-2484

Hard Drives

WD VelociRaptor WD30000HLFS
0.3 TB, 10,000 RPM, 16 MB Cache

Sound

Integrated HD Audio

Network

Integrated Gigabit Networking

Power

Cooler Master RS850-EMBA
850W, ATX12V v2.2, EPS12V

Optical

Lite-On LH-20A1L, 20X DVD±R

Software

OS

Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP1

Graphics

Nvidia GeForce 182.08

Chipset

Intel INF 9.1.0.1007

 
A 1.366 volt output under full load (1.344 volt idle) resulted from setting our Asus P6T motherboard to 1.350V core with Load-Line Calibration enabled.

The increased voltage kept our CPU stable at 3.80 GHz throughout its 8-thread Prime 95 64-bit torture test, while pushing temperatures on these high-capacity coolers beyond 75 degrees Celsius.

Benchmark Configuration
Prime95 v.25.8

64-bit executable, Small FFT's, 8-threads

RealTemp 2.70

Highest core reading at full CPU load (60 minutes)
Highest core reading at 30 minutes idle

Acu-Rite Thermal Probe

IOH/VRM Heat Pipe temperature at northbridge junction
Ambient temperature at 6" from motherboard front edge

Share:
9
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
reynod 10/05/2009 09:33
Hide
-0+

Good article Thomas ... thanks.

david__t 11/05/2009 12:44
Hide
-0+

In my opinion, unless a water setup is virtually silent, it is useless when you take in to account all the extra pain that comes with installing it. Especially when you look at the Zalman CNPS series which is a similar price but runs very cool & silent on air. Also both of the reviewed coolers have limited applications due to their mounting requirements & case size requirements.

reynod 11/05/2009 16:25
Hide
-1+

My two Thermaltake Aquarius II systems leaked ... blew up a graphics card ... not a cheap one ... then a decent ASUS mobo.

My gigabyte water system leaked and took out a network card and a wirless card.

My 600 Watt homemade refrigerated cold water system had excessive condensation which dripped onto the mobo and killed a power regulator.

I went back to heatpipe air coolers after that.

Was an interesting voyage ... no regrets.

Bit like playing with car engines ... after a while you just want to drive smething reliable ... driving in traffic isn't much fun with radical heads, a wild cam and a high stall.

ubertiger 14/05/2009 11:37
Hide
-0+

Well, if your not a mechanic then getting a mechanic to fix your car saves a lot of headaches and can be very reliable. Same with PC watercooling systems, if I broke all that I'd say get a pro to set it up!

zebzz 14/05/2009 16:10
Hide
-0+

I have tried water cooling from several companies and have always used my own plumbing to make sure that they were secure. The most important part to me is if you are using water then why use the fans that make noise. I think water cooling is good for a fanless solution on higher spec processors.

With the latest CPUs and Heat sinks, air cooling has become very good. My Uncle is running an AMD 3800 processor with a fanless PSU, fanless graphics and fanless CPU. Just because the size of the heat sink is big enough to remove the heat away quick enough from the CPU. He has this on for hours at a time with no reboots or slows down.

Water cooling I think is a good project for someone but with the type of over clocking you can get out of the modern CPUs a good air cooler is all you need.

wikkus 14/05/2009 16:52
Hide
-0+

@donyer - pfft... Thermaltake w/c gear is generally acknowledged to be cack and Gigabyte w/c stuff isn't really any better. In fact, most "kits", including those from the more respected manufacturers like Swiftech and Alphacool are poor compared to properly selected individual components, much the same as it used to be with Hi-Fi separates years ago. The difference is, ultimately, you gets what you pays for.

I did my research, bought the "best of breed" w/c components from Thermochill, D-Tek, etc. and my QX6700 has never missed a beat at 3.5GHz in 12 months. BTW, sure, there's going to be peeps out there whose reaction is "omgwtfbbqlol!!111 *only* 3.5Ghz!" and to them I say "whatever". I'm not a "hardcore" overclocker; I'm not doing it for the kudos or whatever, I'm doing it to get the most bang for my buck having had something of a brain-fart in buying a QX instead of a plain old "Q" in the first place ;p

This rig is nowhere near silent, either, but it's a helluva lot quieter than it was on air and it's more stable into the bargain.

Liked the "hotrod" analogy, btw -- I know what you mean -- but that does sound a bit "old skool" when you look at what can be done with stuff in modern cars like Variable Valve Timing, Variable Intake Runners and Serial Port Programming. And no, I'm not a "ricer" ;p Let's just say my ride has a 40-valve V8 ;p

wikkus 14/05/2009 16:52
Hide
-1+

@donyer - pfft... Thermaltake w/c gear is generally acknowledged to be cack and Gigabyte w/c stuff isn't really any better. In fact, most "kits", including those from the more respected manufacturers like Swiftech and Alphacool are poor compared to properly selected individual components, much the same as it used to be with Hi-Fi separates years ago. The difference is, ultimately, you gets what you pays for.

I did my research, bought the "best of breed" w/c components from Thermochill, D-Tek, etc. and my QX6700 has never missed a beat at 3.5GHz in 12 months. BTW, sure, there's going to be peeps out there whose reaction is "omgwtfbbqlol!!111 *only* 3.5Ghz!" and to them I say "whatever". I'm not a "hardcore" overclocker; I'm not doing it for the kudos or whatever, I'm doing it to get the most bang for my buck having had something of a brain-fart in buying a QX instead of a plain old "Q" in the first place ;p

This rig is nowhere near silent, either, but it's a helluva lot quieter than it was on air and it's more stable into the bargain.

Liked the "hotrod" analogy, btw -- I know what you mean -- but that does sound a bit "old skool" when you look at what can be done with stuff in modern cars like Variable Valve Timing, Variable Intake Runners and Serial Port Programming. And no, I'm not a "ricer" ;p Let's just say my ride has a 40-valve V8 ;p

Anonymous 25/07/2009 13:12
Hide
-0+

For some time I'd been wanting to get a watercooler set up. This article finally knocked some sense into me:

I'm not a talented overclocker, nor have spent money on silent parts - so why blow the money? I thus went for a relatively quiet cooler and fan, and it is not audible due to the noise the PSU makes!

Anonymous 16/09/2009 17:37
Hide
-0+

The fans could be even quieter if various patents for blade tip winglets were put into use.

Papst appears to be the only maker shipping such fans currently.

Best offers

Newsletters


OK