Due to the (lack of) performance of the integrated graphics core, we skip the graphics benchmark all together and focus on the CPU tests, which tax PhysX and AI. So, this is really a processor test rather than a graphics test. Does it fully utilize all cores?
It does. Let’s see the results, then.
And of course, the power consumed during the benchmark:
There's practically no noticeable performance difference between running with and without power management. However, due to its ability to fully utilize all available cores, the performance differences between these processors are more apparent. Overall, lower-end processors seem to offer about 2/3 the performance of faster ones. The Athlon X2 7750, 7850, and the newer Athlon II X2 250 basically deliver the same level of performance.
Looking at average consumption, the Athlon II X2 250 uses the least amount of power. That's good, but the Phenom II X3 710 with one additional core isn’t that far off. With this processor, you get more performance (about 38% faster), yet maintain the same average consumption as a dual-core Athlon X2 7750. The situation is similar when we look at the total power consumed during the benchmark run.
But it’s not exactly the most efficient processor. Once you tweak the voltages, the Phenom II X4 945 offers more performance (136% compared to the the Athlon X2 7750, 53% compared to the Phenom II X3 710), while consuming just a little bit more power (19% more than the Athlon X2 7750). Put into perspective, that’s almost the same total power consumption as an Athlon X2 7750, yet close to 2.5 times the performance (it offers about 2.41 times the performance). The Phenom II X4 955 is 156% faster and consumes 30% more power.
There's more to the situation than meets the eye, though. If you remember, the difference in average consumption is about 19 watts. Now, that includes the difference due to different motherboards used (Biostar TA790GX 128M and Gigabyte GA-MA790GP DS4H). If our estimates are correct, the Phenom II X4 945 consumes just as much (or as little) power as the Athlon X2 7750 with Optimized settings.
- Test System And Benchmarks
- Benchmark Results: 3DMark 2001
- Benchmark Results: 3DMark Vantage
- Benchmark Results: SuperPi 1M And 8M
- Benchmark Results: WinRAR
- Benchmark Results: Cinebench R10
- Benchmark Results: POVRay 3.6
- Benchmark Results: Photoshop CS4
- Benchmark Results: Video Encoding
- Benchmark Results: 1080p WMV With VirtualDub And DivX
- Benchmark Results: 1080p AVI With VirtualDub And XviD
- Benchmark Results: Audio Encoding
- Benchmark Results: Video Playback
- Benchmark Results: DivX And WMV, No Hardware Acceleration
- Performance And Power Management, The Best Of Both Worlds