Graphics: Two Gigabyte GeForce 9800 GX2
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: computer, price, performance
Graphics: Two Gigabyte GeForce 9800 GX2
We received a lot of criticism in our March System Builder Marathon over the use of two 8800 GTX graphics cards, where many users felt the 9800 GX2 would be a superior solution. Our reasons for not previously choosing the higher-priced model was that the drivers were immature and the cards we’re quite ready for full competition. And even though the 9800 GX2 began overcoming those challenges before our March Marathon was published, questionable performance level increases in SLI mode had left us very comfortable with our decision.
Further driver development has shown real performance improvements for the 9800 GX2, so we were finally ready to reconsider our choice. Based on sample availability, we again chose Gigabyte as the supplier.

Gigabyte’s GV-NX98X1GHI-B features the full set of reference specifications, using two 600 MHz G92 graphics processors and 1 GB of GDDR3-2000 memory. It therefore appears rather ordinary in the world of 9800 GX2’s, and we might have found a better-priced brand had we actually been forced to purchase our cards. Still, we hope that readers will consider warranty and technical support in addition to price when making their purchase.
The 9800 GX2 is two complete graphics cards tied together in one package, and questions still loom about the efficiency of “four way SLI” configurations using two of these dual-GPU units. Popular support among readers, rather than our own experience, is our main reason including the configuration in today’s build.
By now many of you are probably wondering why we didn’t choose a pair of the new GTX 280 graphics cards for our highest-priced system. This marathon was in fact supposed to run two weeks ago, prior to the release of the GTX 280, and an announcement date had not even been set during this article’s planning stages when we procured components. We’re sure many of you have experienced the let down of ordering parts and watching as new ones are released before you’ve even gotten your newly-outdated system running, and our experience should provide some consolation.
Other factors that might have prevented us from using the newer graphics technology include price, where a pair of GTX 280 cards would have broken our $4,000 total system budget, and fear of the unknown, as the new cards had not been tested yet.
- Previous page Motherboard: Asus Striker II Extreme
- Next page Memory: Patriot Extreme Performance...
- Four AMD dual-core prices now at or near Intel price/performance curve
- ATI leads Nvidia in GPU price/performance across the board
- Panasonic price cuts on 16x DVD burners triggers price war
- SmartStep's weak performance may move Dell to rethink low-price...
- Microsoft rumored to cut Xbox 360 price by $100
- Flash memory in Hybrid hard drives *save* power
- Looking to buy Laptop, need help Please. Also, Mac vs. PC?
- Does this sound like a decent Gaming computer? (for the price)
- Dell's XPS 720 H2C Hot and Cool
- Looking for new PC suggestions
- benchmark?
- Another "Which monitor to buy" Thread
- Need help buying gaming monitor!
- Samsung 22" question
- Gateway - 24" FHD2400 Widescreen, were art thou review?
And I think this shows perfectly the problem with the "must have the biggest and best" mentality of today's consumer - just because it's out doesn't mean it's ready.
If I were building a system right now I'd probably go for a pair of 8800GTXs knowing that when I needed to upgrade my graphics again I can stick a 3rd in.
Of course, without the endlessly-pocketed show-off consumer, we'd never get refinement and improvement of such products so we sensible types can benefit 6 months down the line.