Conclusion
In this article, we took the components used to upgrade a three-year-old PC in the article Time to Upgrade: Should You Dump Your 2007 PC? and tested them individually. We replaced the P35 motherboard with a Core 2 quad-core and 4 GB of DDR2 RAM with a new MSI P55A Fuzion, Core i7-870, and 4 GB of DDR3 RAM. The older Zotac GeForce 8800 GTS made way for MSI's R5870 Lightning, and WD’s 150 GB Raptor hard drive downsized to G.Skill's Phoenix 100 GB SSD.
Scenario 1: Motherboard/CPU/RAM Replacement
Replacing platform components heavily impacts power consumption while significantly increasing performance. However, even a three-year-old quad-core CPU still has lots of firepower for most modern applications. Our conclusion for the full upgrade in the prior article remains valid here: save your money if you don’t use applications that necessitate a platform upgrade.
Scenario 2: Graphics Upgrade
Spending a few hundred dollars on a graphics card is a trickier proposition. True gamers will most likely not have waited three years for a graphics card replacement, as newer cards are faster, provide more advanced functionality, and in the case of AMD's Radeon HD 5000-series, deliver lower power consumption. Occasional gamers should consider purchasing a mainstream graphics card instead of the Radeon HD 5870 we chose, since even a mid-range card like Nvidia's GeForce GTX 460 will improve performance, features, and power savings.
Scenario 3: HDD/SSD Upgrade
This upgrade option is the real surprise. Although decent SSDs start at $200 ($300+ in the case of our 100 GB drive), the benefits are much more noticeable than in Scenarios 1 and 2. The SSD-enabled system boots up much quicker, shuts down a bit faster, and launches applications in only a fraction of the time required by even today's top hard drives. SSD benefits will be glaring to all user types.
We would prioritize these upgrade options in the following order:
Gamers
- Graphics Card
- SSD
- Motherboard/CPU/RAM
Power Users
- SSD
- Motherboard/CPU/RAM
- Graphics Card
Mainstream Users
- SSD
- Motherboard/CPU/RAM (if at all)
- Graphics Card (if at all, or select a mainstream card)
- Performance PC,
- MSI,
- component ,
- upgrade ,
- ssd
Latest Tweaking & Tuning News
Latest Tweaking & Tuning reviews
- 11/05 – Do-It-Yourself: Upgrading Apple's 27" iMac With An SSD
- 17/04 – Overclocking: Asus Rampage IV Extreme Versus EVGA X79 FTW
- 30/03 – System Builder Marathon Bonus: Newegg Customer Choice PC
- 29/03 – System Builder Marathon, March 2012: System Value Compared
- 28/03 – System Builder Marathon, March 2012: $2600 Performance PC
Finnaly a test driven article about claims I have been making for the last 6 months regarding SSD upgrades.
Keep up the good work.
I guess the results might be stretched for even older / less powerful systems - I might notice more of a benefit from upgrading my old dual core 3800+, if only it had been socket AM2 I would have done (although in most cases it seems to hold up quite reasonably). I suppose there's no reasonable way that the tests could have covered quite such a spread of hardware.
Me thinks that would be DX 10.....
^ I concure
Decent article, I have an SSD beside me right now for tomorrow's job....
I was thinking about a 'platform' upgrade as well, but it'll be the video card first!