Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Test Setup And Benchmarks

by
System Hardware
HardwareDetails
Motherboard
(LGA 1156)
MSI H55M-ED55 (Rev. 1.0)
Chipset: H55
BIOS: 1.11 (01/04/2010)
CPU IntelIntel Core i5-661 (32nm, 3.33 GHz, 2 x 256KB L2 and 4MB L3 Cache, TDP 87W)
RAM DDR3 (dual)2 x 2GB DDR3-1600 (Corsair CMD4GX3M2A1600C8)
Hard DriveSolidata K5 SLC Flash SSD
SATA/300, 64MB Cache
GraphicsZotac GeForce GTX 260²
GPU: GeForce GTX 260 (576 MHz), Graphics RAM: 896MB DDR3 (1,998 MHz), Stream Processors: 216, Shader Clock: 1242 MHz
Power SupplyPC Power & Cooling, Silencer 750EPS12V 750W
System Software & Drivers
Operating SystemWindows 7 Ultimate X64
Updated 2010-01-11
Drivers and Settings
Intel Chipset DriversChipset Installation Utility Ver. 9.1.1.1025
Nvidia Graphics DriversVersion 8.16
Application Benchmarks and Settings
BenchmarkDetails
7-zipVersion 9.1 beta
1. Syntax "a -r -ptest -t7z -m0=LZMA2 -mx1 -mmt=8"
2. Syntax "a -r -ptest -t7z -m0=LZMA2 -mx9 -mmt=8"
3. Integrated Benchmark
Benchmark: THG-Workload
BitLockerWindows 7 integrated
Encrypt RAM-Drive (330MB)
Benchmark: THG-Workload
WinZip 14Version 14.0 Pro (8652)
WinZip Commandline Version 3
1. Syntax "-stest -ycAES256 -a -el -p -r"
2. Syntax "-stest -ycAES256 -a -e0 -p -r"
Benchmark: THG-Workload
Synthetic Benchmarks and Settings
BenchmarkDetails
EverestVersion: 5.3
Zlib and AES Benchmark
PCMark VantageVersion: 1.00
Communications Suite
SiSoftware Sandra 2009Version: 2010 .1.16.10
Processor Arithmetic, Cryptography, Memory Bandwith


The competition for this review: Intel’s LGA 1156-compatible Core i7-870 quad-core.

Share:
10
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
mi1ez 02/02/2010 10:03
Hide
-1+

Good grief. About 3 mistakes on the first page!

mi1ez 02/02/2010 10:22
Hide
-0+

I may be being a bit skeptical, butputting on the highest i5 chips that include a GPU? Does this not sound like a money spinner?

aje21 02/02/2010 14:13
Hide
-1+

Nice to see that Intel have finally caught up with Via...
Shame we can't see any benchmarks to compare the performance of the AES engines.

wifiwolf 03/02/2010 19:14
Hide
-1+

I'd think it's not all good things coming from this ability.
Malware programmers can benefit from it as it should accelerate decrypting passwords and alike.

psiboy 04/02/2010 10:15
Hide
-0+

Gee lets compare a quad core to a dual core? WTF! No balance or objectivity here at all! This got past the editors how?

Anonymous 04/02/2010 15:39
Hide
-0+

How does the CPU knows about to use the ASE instructions? Is there a special library comming with the Benchmarks?

Anonymous 04/02/2010 23:04
Hide
-0+

Please do some Linux tests! IMHO the support for the new AES-NI has been in the kernel for quite some time (done by Intel long before those CPUs even came to the market!) and dm-crypt is a very nice way to test REAL WORLD speeds.

Anonymous 05/02/2010 17:48
Hide
--2+

Imagine new i5 without AES-NI! Why would you buy it anyway when it is always inferior compared to i7? Well - there comes Intel marketing guys and say: We will put AES-NI just in i5 (in the beginning) hoping that the product will attract some buyers. If they put now AES-NI in i7, i5 will be doomed processor.

roots 03/03/2010 02:21
Hide
-2+

This would be very nice in a firewall. VPN thoughput on one of these CPU's would be awsome.

My Guess is that where this CPU will end up. The next gen of Cisco ASA series and the like.

Anonymous 02/06/2010 12:55
Hide
-0+

Still kinda sucks... as the AES-NI is only for the 1156 socket. Unless I feel like forking out 1K for the 980x (1366)

Best offers

Newsletters


OK