Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Search Tom's Hardware
Signin with

[31] Performance per Watt Database

at Database Operations ([Database I/Os per Watt])

You are here : Disques durs > HDD Charts 2012 > [31] Performance per Watt Database


Choose Benchmark
  1. [01] Read Throughput Average: h2benchw 3.16
  2. [02] Read Throughput Maximum: h2benchw 3.16
  3. [03] Read Throughput Minimum: h2benchw 3.16
  4. [04] Write Throughput Average: h2benchw 3.16
  5. [05] Write Throughput Maximum: h2benchw 3.16
  6. [06] Write Throughput Minimum: h2benchw 3.16
  7. [07] Read Access Time: h2benchw 3.16 (including rotational latency)
  8. [08] Write Access Time: h2benchw 3.16 (including rotational latency)
  9. [09] Interface Performance: h2benchw 3.16
  10. [10] PCMark 7 System Storage Score
  11. [11] PCMark 7 Windows Defender
  12. [12] PCMark 7 Importing Pictures to Windows Photo Gallery
  13. [13] PCMark 7 Video editing using Windows Movie Maker
  14. [14] PCMark 7 Windows Media Center Performance
  15. [15] PCMark 7 Adding music to Windows Media Player
  16. [16] PCMark 7 Application loading
  17. [17] PCMark 7 Gaming
  18. [18] IOMeter 2006.07.27 4K Random Reads Average I/O operations per second
  19. [19] IOMeter 2006.07.27 4K Random Writes Average I/O operations per second
  20. [20] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Database Average I/O operations per second
  21. [21] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Fileserver Average I/O operations per second
  22. [22] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Web Server Average I/O operations per second
  23. [23] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Workstation Average I/O operations per second
  24. [24] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Streaming Reads Average throughput [MB/s]
  25. [25] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Streaming Writes Average throughput [MB/s]
  26. [26] Power Requirement at Idle Avg. Power [Watt]
  27. [27] Power Requirement: HD Video Playback Avg. Power [Watt]
  28. [28] Power Requirement at Maximum Write Throughput Avg. Power [Watt]
  29. [29] Performance per Watt Streaming Writes [Streaming Writes MB per Watt]
  30. [30] Power Requirement at Database Benchmark Avg. Power [Watt]
  31. [32] Drive Surface Temperature Centigrade
  32. [33] Drive Surface Temperature Fahrenheit
  33. [34] Desktop Performance

Narrow down results :
0 8.2 16.4 24.6 32.8 41
score (in Score)

    • (1 TB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    49.40

    • (300 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    45.24

    • (600 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    41.39

    • (2 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    22.96

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    22.40

    • (1 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    21.40

    • (1 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    21.40

    • (2 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    21.30

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    21.10

    • (1 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    21.07

    • (3 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    19.40

    • (2 TB, 5900 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    18.60

    • (2 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    18.36

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    18.30

    • (500 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    18.23

    • (74 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    18.08

    • (3 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    Novelties
    18

    • (2 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    17.53

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    17.47

    • (4 TB, 5900 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    Novelties
    17.30

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    17.29

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    17.07

    • (1 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    16.62

    • (4 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    16.50

    • (3 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    16.18

    • (150 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    16.15

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    16.07

    • (750 GB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    16.01

    • (3 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    15.92

    • (2 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    15.85

    • (500 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    15.76

    • (750 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    15.61

    • (3 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    15.57

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    15.49

    • (750 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    15.48

    • (500 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    15.16

    • (1.5 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    15.01

    • (1.5 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    15

    • (3 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    14.91

    • (1 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    14.73

    • (4 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    14.50

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    14.44

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    14.39

    • (3 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    13.98

    • (4 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    Novelties
    13.90

    • (750 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    13.78

    • (4 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    13.50

    • (500 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    13.11

    • (500 GB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    13.01

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    12.86

    • (36 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 1.5 Gbit/s)
    12.40

    • (1 TB, 5900 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    12.21

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    12.15

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    11.98

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    11.48

    • (1.5 TB, 5900 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    11.27

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    10.46

    • (500 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    9.92

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
      7.34
  •  
0 8.2 16.4 24.6 32.8 41
score (in Score)
Legend
  •   Western Digital
  •   Seagate
  •   Toshiba
  •   Samsung
  •   Hitachi
Permalink to this performance chart configuration
See other Disques durs performance charts
Best offers
Latest Articles
HP ZR2740w Versus Asus PB278Q: QHD 27

HP ZR2740w Versus Asus PB278Q: QHD 27" Monitors, Tested
Until cutting-edge UHD (3840×2160) displays hit the mainstream, most enthusiasts have to be content with QHD monitors at 2560x1440 pixels. In the lab today, we have two more 27-inch QHD screens: the ZR2740w from HP and the PB278Q from Asus. read more

All Articles and reviews Hard Drives and SSDs
Latest News
All News Hard Drives and SSDs
Partners