Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Search Tom's Hardware
Signin with

[15] PCMark 7 Adding music to Windows Media Player

Adding music to Windows Media Player [MB/s]

You are here : Disques durs > HDD Charts 2012 > [15] PCMark 7 Adding music to Windows Media Player


Choose Benchmark
  1. [01] Read Throughput Average: h2benchw 3.16
  2. [02] Read Throughput Maximum: h2benchw 3.16
  3. [03] Read Throughput Minimum: h2benchw 3.16
  4. [04] Write Throughput Average: h2benchw 3.16
  5. [05] Write Throughput Maximum: h2benchw 3.16
  6. [06] Write Throughput Minimum: h2benchw 3.16
  7. [07] Read Access Time: h2benchw 3.16 (including rotational latency)
  8. [08] Write Access Time: h2benchw 3.16 (including rotational latency)
  9. [09] Interface Performance: h2benchw 3.16
  10. [10] PCMark 7 System Storage Score
  11. [11] PCMark 7 Windows Defender
  12. [12] PCMark 7 Importing Pictures to Windows Photo Gallery
  13. [13] PCMark 7 Video editing using Windows Movie Maker
  14. [14] PCMark 7 Windows Media Center Performance
  15. [16] PCMark 7 Application loading
  16. [17] PCMark 7 Gaming
  17. [18] IOMeter 2006.07.27 4K Random Reads Average I/O operations per second
  18. [19] IOMeter 2006.07.27 4K Random Writes Average I/O operations per second
  19. [20] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Database Average I/O operations per second
  20. [21] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Fileserver Average I/O operations per second
  21. [22] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Web Server Average I/O operations per second
  22. [23] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Workstation Average I/O operations per second
  23. [24] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Streaming Reads Average throughput [MB/s]
  24. [25] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Streaming Writes Average throughput [MB/s]
  25. [26] Power Requirement at Idle Avg. Power [Watt]
  26. [27] Power Requirement: HD Video Playback Avg. Power [Watt]
  27. [28] Power Requirement at Maximum Write Throughput Avg. Power [Watt]
  28. [29] Performance per Watt Streaming Writes [Streaming Writes MB per Watt]
  29. [30] Power Requirement at Database Benchmark Avg. Power [Watt]
  30. [31] Performance per Watt Database [Database I/Os per Watt]
  31. [32] Drive Surface Temperature Centigrade
  32. [33] Drive Surface Temperature Fahrenheit
  33. [34] Desktop Performance

Narrow down results :
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
score (in MB/s)

    • (1 TB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.34

    • (600 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.31

    • (3 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.31

    • (3 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    Novelties
    1.31

    • (4 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.31

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.30

    • (4 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.29

    • (2 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.29

    • (150 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.29

    • (74 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.29

    • (4 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    Novelties
    1.27

    • (300 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.27

    • (3 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.27

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.27

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.27

    • (4 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.26

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.26

    • (2 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.26

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.26

    • (2 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.26

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.26

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.26

    • (3 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.26

    • (3 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.25

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.25

    • (500 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.25

    • (1 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.25

    • (3 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.25

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.24

    • (3 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.24

    • (1 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.24

    • (750 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.24

    • (2 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.24

    • (36 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 1.5 Gbit/s)
    1.24

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.24

    • (1 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.24

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.24

    • (1.5 TB, 5900 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.23

    • (4 TB, 5900 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    Novelties
    1.23

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.23

    • (500 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.23

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.23

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.23

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.23

    • (500 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.22

    • (2 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.22

    • (500 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.22

    • (1 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.22

    • (750 GB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.22

    • (500 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.22

    • (1.5 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.22

    • (1 TB, 5900 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.22

    • (1 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.21

    • (750 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.21

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.20

    • (2 TB, 5900 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1.19

    • (1.5 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.18

    • (750 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.18

    • (500 GB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1.15
  •  
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
score (in MB/s)
Legend
  •   Western Digital
  •   Hitachi
  •   Toshiba
  •   Samsung
  •   Seagate
Permalink to this performance chart configuration
See other Disques durs performance charts
Best offers
Latest Articles
AMD's Kabini: Jaguar And GCN Come Together In A 15 W APU

AMD's Kabini: Jaguar And GCN Come Together In A 15 W APU
AMD is ready to talk about the Temash and Kabini APUs, based on its Jaguar x86 architecture and Graphics Core Next design. We even have a reference Temash-based notebook here in the lab for benchmarking. How does it compare to Pentium and Core i3? read more

All Articles and reviews Hard Drives and SSDs
Latest News
All News Hard Drives and SSDs
Partners