Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Search Tom's Hardware
Signin with

[10] PCMark 7 System Storage

System Storage (Score)

You are here : Disques durs > HDD Charts 2012 > [10] PCMark 7 System Storage


Choose Benchmark
  1. [01] Read Throughput Average: h2benchw 3.16
  2. [02] Read Throughput Maximum: h2benchw 3.16
  3. [03] Read Throughput Minimum: h2benchw 3.16
  4. [04] Write Throughput Average: h2benchw 3.16
  5. [05] Write Throughput Maximum: h2benchw 3.16
  6. [06] Write Throughput Minimum: h2benchw 3.16
  7. [07] Read Access Time: h2benchw 3.16 (including rotational latency)
  8. [08] Write Access Time: h2benchw 3.16 (including rotational latency)
  9. [09] Interface Performance: h2benchw 3.16
  10. [11] PCMark 7 Windows Defender
  11. [12] PCMark 7 Importing Pictures to Windows Photo Gallery
  12. [13] PCMark 7 Video editing using Windows Movie Maker
  13. [14] PCMark 7 Windows Media Center Performance
  14. [15] PCMark 7 Adding music to Windows Media Player
  15. [16] PCMark 7 Application loading
  16. [17] PCMark 7 Gaming
  17. [18] IOMeter 2006.07.27 4K Random Reads Average I/O operations per second
  18. [19] IOMeter 2006.07.27 4K Random Writes Average I/O operations per second
  19. [20] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Database Average I/O operations per second
  20. [21] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Fileserver Average I/O operations per second
  21. [22] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Web Server Average I/O operations per second
  22. [23] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Workstation Average I/O operations per second
  23. [24] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Streaming Reads Average throughput [MB/s]
  24. [25] IOMeter 2006.07.27 Streaming Writes Average throughput [MB/s]
  25. [26] Power Requirement at Idle Avg. Power [Watt]
  26. [27] Power Requirement: HD Video Playback Avg. Power [Watt]
  27. [28] Power Requirement at Maximum Write Throughput Avg. Power [Watt]
  28. [29] Performance per Watt Streaming Writes [Streaming Writes MB per Watt]
  29. [30] Power Requirement at Database Benchmark Avg. Power [Watt]
  30. [31] Performance per Watt Database [Database I/Os per Watt]
  31. [32] Drive Surface Temperature Centigrade
  32. [33] Drive Surface Temperature Fahrenheit
  33. [34] Desktop Performance

Narrow down results :
0 467.2 934.4 1401.6 1868.8 2336
score (in Score)

    • (1 TB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    2803

    • (600 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    2500

    • (3 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    2414

    • (4 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    2397

    • (3 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    Novelties
    2392

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    2309

    • (3 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    2289

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    2287

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    2271

    • (4 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    Novelties
    2258

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    2249

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    2214

    • (3 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    2209

    • (4 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    2182

    • (300 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    2181

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    2140

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    2094

    • (2 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    2063

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    2043

    • (4 TB, 5900 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    Novelties
    2037

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    2022

    • (3 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    2019

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    2018

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    2013

    • (3 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    2011

    • (1.5 TB, 5900 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    2011

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1995

    • (750 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1994

    • (2 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1984

    • (4 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1980

    • (1 TB, 5900 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1957

    • (750 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1939

    • (2 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1927

    • (2 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1908

    • (74 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1900

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1897

    • (150 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1893

    • (1 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1893

    • (1 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1882

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1881

    • (1 TB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1880

    • (2 TB, 5900 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1876

    • (1 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1872

    • (750 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1843

    • (3 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 6 Gbit/s)
    1822

    • (2 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1819

    • (500 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1795

    • (500 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1792

    • (500 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1764

    • (2 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1725

    • (1 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1724

    • (1 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1717

    • (1.5 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1714

    • (500 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1711

    • (750 GB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1692

    • (1.5 TB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1640

    • (36 GB, 10,000 rpm, SATA 1.5 Gbit/s)
    1616

    • (500 GB, 7200 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1605

    • (500 GB, 5400 rpm, SATA 3 Gbit/s)
    1438
  •  
0 467.2 934.4 1401.6 1868.8 2336
score (in Score)
Legend
  •   Western Digital
  •   Hitachi
  •   Toshiba
  •   Seagate
  •   Samsung
Permalink to this performance chart configuration
See other Disques durs performance charts
Best offers
Latest Articles
HP ZR2740w Versus Asus PB278Q: QHD 27

HP ZR2740w Versus Asus PB278Q: QHD 27" Monitors, Tested
Until cutting-edge UHD (3840×2160) displays hit the mainstream, most enthusiasts have to be content with QHD monitors at 2560x1440 pixels. In the lab today, we have two more 27-inch QHD screens: the ZR2740w from HP and the PB278Q from Asus. read more

All Articles and reviews Hard Drives and SSDs
Latest News
All News Hard Drives and SSDs
Partners