Black Silicon CMOS Sensors 100 Times More Sensitive
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: black, silicon, photography Category : Miscellaneous
The accidental discovery of black silicon several years ago is paving the way for new imaging sensors that are 100 times more sensitive to visible light than conventional silicon based detectors.
On Monday, Harvard University announced that it had exclusively licensed its portfolio of black silicon patents to SiOnyx, Inc. As part of the licensing agreement, Harvard had gained an equity position in SiOnyx and it will receive downstream royalties. SiOnyx was founded by Professor Eric Mazur and Dr. James Carey of Harvard University in 2006 and it has since raised $11 million in funding from investment partners. The company will focus on being a technology provider, working with industry partners to help incorporate its technology and providing entrepreneurs and experimenters with a new generation of supersensitive light detectors.
Black silicon was accidentally discovered in 1999 at Harvard University by Professor Eric Mazur and his team of graduate students, which included the then graduate student James Carey. During an Army-funded study of what new chemistry may occur when a laser is shone on metals, the team decided to also see what a femtosecond laser would do to silicon. They put a piece of silicon in a vacuum chamber, added halogen gas and then scanned the silicon with highly-intense laser pulses. After hundreds of pulses, the silicon turned black and its surface under an electron microscope showed a forest of tiny spikes that were of regular size and spacing. The team quickly realized some possible practical applications for the newly discovered black silicon, ranging from highly efficient solar panels to drug delivery systems.
Black silicon is a highly light-absorbent material that can absorb nearly all visible light, almost doubling the amount that regular silicon can absorb. It can also detect infrared light that regular silicon-based devices can not and it can be used as an efficient field emitter.
Although many creative applications for black silicon have been thought up, including the use in ray-like weapons, it would seem SiOnyx is primarily interested in the excellent photoconductive properties of black silicon. Apparently light sensors using black silicon are 100 times more sensitive to visible light than conventional silicon sensors, allowing a pixel 1-micrometer in size to produce the same signal as a traditional pixel 10-micrometer in size.
For consumers, smaller pixels could mean smaller sensors, which could use smaller lenses, resulting in cameras that are smaller and cheaper. Smaller pixels could also mean greater pixel densities, introducing a new generation of ultra-high resolution cameras that are capable of taking noise-free photos. Such technology may be closer than it seems, as SiOnyx had stated, “[it] is currently working with OEM partners within the imaging market to integrate Black Silicon as the next generation detector technology for CMOS imaging.”
-
Previous News Article
TSA Employee Steals Over $200,000 in... -
Next News Article
Corsair Shows New Energy Efficient...
- TSA Employee Steals Over $200,000 in Electronics
- Digg Clone Launches With Focus on Finance
- Obama Uses Xbox 360 Video Games to Campaign
- PS3 2.50 Firmware Adds In-Game Screenshots and More
- Quest for the World's First "Thinking" Computer
- Fewer People Downloading Music Illegally
- YouTube to Run Full Length Episodes of Star Trek, 90210
- T-Mobile Sells 1.5 Million G1s in Two Weeks
- BlackBerry 8220 Flip Phone on Sale Today
- Old Man EU Tells Consumers to Turn Down the Racket
Forget smaller sensors or higher number of pixels, if it's "100 times more sensitive to visible light" then I want to be able to take photos at 1/100th of a second that today would take a whole second. Now that would be very handy. Is that possible?
Jonnyhuk2 I don't really think so, because there are some other matter to take care for the think that you want, such as a very powerfull/fast processor to do that job. I mean take a regular digital camera(try not to shoot a picture-just movie it around and watch through the tft screen) for example, you will see in some parts that if you move the camera too fast you are having a delay usually due to the processor of that camera and not from the sensor. I mean this test can be done better if you use a mobile phone, there you can clearly see a huge delay. I have a Sharp v903SH which has a quite good CCD sensor(for mobile phone).. the cpu of this phone is pretty bad though. Even if it's 3.2MP sensor it only shoots video with 320x240 pixel resolution, why? the processor isn't powerfull enough not even for VGA(640x480) resolution.
I have a pretty amusing picture (somewhere) of my mate snorting Jack Daniels. Silly idea. But, there's someone opposite taking a photo at the same time and you can see how far through processing my phone was when the flash went off because half the image has a brilliant white background, and the other half hasn't. An extreme example, but it proves CrAcKeZ' point. I'll see if I can hunt it out...
Not quite as extreme as I made out, but you get the idea...
[image]http://b6.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/00974/68/05/974905086_l.jpg[/image]
Don't know my BBCode that well, so here's a link too
Nevermind a sensor that is 100x more seneitive. Weren't we told over a year ago now that single pixel sensors were going to be the way forward instead of ever increasing gigapixel size's ?