Best Gaming Graphics Cards For The Money: AGP Interface
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: best, graphics, card
Best Gaming Graphics Cards For The Money: AGP Interface
Best AGP Card for Under $100:
Radeon HD 2600 PRO | | Codename: | RV630 | | Process: | 65nm | | Universal Shaders: | 128 | | Texture Units: | 8 | | ROPs: | 4 | | Memory Bus: | 128-bit | | Core Speed MHz: | 600 | | Memory Speed MHz: | 500 (1000 effective) | | DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10 / SM 4.0 |
In this category we’re recommending the low-priced Radeon 2600 PRO. This card is almost as fast as the older GeForce 7600, but can now be found for about $75 on the aging AGP bus, making it a good buy.
Best AGP Card for $100:
Radeon HD 2600 XT | | Codename: | RV630 | | Process: | 65nm | | Universal Shaders: | 128 | | Texture Units: | 8 | | ROPs: | 4 | | Memory Bus: | 128-bit | | Core Speed MHz: | 800 | | Memory Speed MHz: | 700 (1400 effective) | | DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10 / SM 4.0 |
The 2600 XT is relatively new to the AGP scene, but almost as cheap as its PCIe cousin. This is a decently fast DirectX 10 card for AGP, and surprisingly offers a great deal of performance at the $100 price point. Be forewarned that it’s been reported that the official AMD drivers don’t work with the AGP version of this card, but that the modified Omega drivers work fine.
Best AGP Card For $140:
| Radeon 3850 512MB | |
|---|---|
| Codename: | RV670 |
| Process: | 55nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 320 |
| Texture Units: | 16 |
| ROPs: | 16 |
| Memory Bus: | 256-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 670 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 833 (1666 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10.1 / SM 4.0 |
Forever rumored and now finally available to purchase, the Radeon 3850 is a curiously powerful card for the aging AGP bus. In fact, it’s a bit too powerful to be properly utilized with the single-core CPUs that are typically found on this platform.
Regardless, this is the most powerful AGP card you can get. Maybe you have an AGP gaming system you just can’t bear to part with, or perhaps you have an older system with both a dual-core CPU and AGP slot: whatever the reason, you can’t get better than an AGP 3850. If anyone ever releases a more powerful card in the future for the dying bus, we’ll be incredibly surprised.
- Previous page PCI Express Interface: $350 To $400
- Next page What About A Card That's Not On The...
- Best Graphics Cards For The Money: July '08
- Radeon HD 4870: Better Than GTX 260!
- ATI Radeon HD 4850: Smarter by Design?
- iBuypower Gamer 942IL: Best of the Best?
- Nvidia's CUDA: The End of the CPU?
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 260/280 Review
- Quad SLI Vs. 3-Way SLI
- Comparative Component Charts
- Best Graphics Cards for the Money: June 08
- Radeon 3850 AGP Plus Single-Core CPU
- Min spec HTPC you can get away with.
- Upgrade Dell Optiplex GX270
- Newbie on workstations
- Dell 720: All 4 memory modules dead at once, need help ASAP
- Inspiron 530 Questions
- Upgrading my mothers computer
- LG L227WTG: Overall, Phenomenal--But Possible Backlight Issue?
- Samsung 2232BW vs. LG's L227WTG-PF and W2252TQ-TF?
- Please assist me in choosing a new LCD monitor
- Samsung 2493HM 24"
is there anyway of fixing the chart at the end?
any way of fixing the chart at the end?
yay, more graphics card info!
btw, the posted info for the 2x9800GTX SLI "honourable mention" is the same as for the 2x4850..

slipped past quality control, that one!
Argh! Go back to the ATi, NVidia column structure, the list is completely impossible to decipher.
They did this with the last monthly cards round up also, the comparison list was badly formatted, but they fixed it sooner, to make a readable table, just highlight the table, copy into word and use replace all in word, "| |" with "| ^p |" (without quotes)
On second thoughts, just go to last months review table: http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/gami [...] 055-6.html
its the exact same as this one i think.
they really should re-read their reviews and get rid of contradiction, eg
The 8800 GT offers incredible GeForce 8800 GTX class performance, so why is it a lower class down than the 8800GTX in the table/list, and the 8800GTS 512 is quite a bit faster than the 8800GT so how comes this is ranked lower than the 8800GTX and ultras.
I used to believe TH to be a good source of info but recently Ive seen a drop in quality, please fix it guys.
I've registered just to say that (again!) an article purely about money is posted on the uk version of Tom's, priced in $$$$$'s!
If you can't be bothered to do the conversion work, why bother to have a UK domain site???
Just gone back and quickly checked - Tom's UK site apparently stopped caring sometime between March and June 08 - the March article is in £'s, the June and all since are in $'s.
I have a feeling that soon we will no longer be seeing the "Best video cards of.." as I had quite a difficult time finding this article. Doesn't seem to be a priority any more.
Another favorite from the "old" tom's site that is fading away..
>sob<