Conclusion
What about this other CPU that’s not on the list? How do I know if it’s a good deal or not?
This will happen. In fact, it’s guaranteed to happen because availability and prices change quickly. So how do you know if that CPU you’ve got your eye on is a good buy in its price range?
Here is a resource to help you judge if a CPU is a good buy or not: The gaming CPU hierarchy chart, which groups CPUs with similar overall gaming performance levels into tiers. The top tier contains the highest-performing gaming CPUs available and gaming performance decreases as you go down the tiers from there.
However, a word of caution: this hierarchy is based on the average performance each CPU achieved in our charts test suite using only four game titles: Crysis, Unreal Tournament 3, World in Conflict, and Supreme Commander. While we feel this represents an acceptable cross-section of typical gaming scenarios, a specific game title will likely perform differently. Some games, for example, will be severely graphics subsystem limited, while others may react positively to more CPU cores, larger amounts of CPU cache, or even a specific architecture. We also did not have access to every CPU on the market, so some of the CPU performance estimates are based on the numbers similar architectures deliver. Indeed, this hierarchy chart is useful as a general guideline, but certainly not as a gospel one-size-fits-all perfect CPU comparison resource.
You can use this hierarchy to compare the pricing between two processors, to see which one is a better deal, and also to determine if an upgrade is worthwhile. I don’t recommend upgrading your CPU unless the potential replacement is at least three tiers higher. Otherwise, the upgrade is somewhat parallel and you may not notice a worthwhile difference in game performance.
| Gaming CPU Hierarchy Chart | |
|---|---|
| Intel | AMD |
| Core i7 Extreme 965, 975 Core i7 920, 940, 950 Core 2 Extreme QX9775, QX9770, QX9650 Core 2 Quad Q9650 | |
| Core 2 Extreme QX6850, QX6800 Core 2 Quad Q9550, Q9450, Q9400 Core 2 Duo E8600, E8500 | Phenom II X4 Black Edition 955, 965 |
| Core 2 Extreme QX6700 Core 2 Quad Q6700, Q9300, Q8400, Q6600, Q8300 Core 2 Duo E8400, E8300, E8190, E8200, E7600, E7500, E6850 | Phenom X4 945, 940, 920, 810 Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition |
| Core 2 Quad Q8200, E7400, E6750 Core 2 Extreme X6800 | Phenom II X4 910, 805, 905e Phenom X4 9950 Phenom II X3 710, 705e Phenom II X2 545, 550 Black Edition |
| Core 2 Duo E7200, E6550, E7300, E6540, E6700 Pentium Dual-Core E6300 | Phenom X4 9850, 9750, 9650, 9600 Phenom X3 8850, 8750 Athlon 64 X2 6400+ |
| Core 2 Duo E4700, E4600, E6600, E4500, E6420 Pentium Dual-Core E5400, E5300, E5200 | Athlon II X2 250 Phenom X4 9500, 9550, 9450e, 9350e Phenom X3 8650, 8600, 8550, 8450e, 8450, 8400, 8250e Athlon X2 7850, 7750 Athlon 64 X2 6000+, 5600+ |
| Core 2 Duo E4400, E4300, E6400, E6320 | Phenom X4 9150e, 9100e Athlon X2 7550, 7450, 5050e, 4850e/b Athlon 64 X2 5400+, 5200+, 5000+, 4800+ |
| Core 2 Duo E6300 Pentium Dual-Core E2220, E2200, E2210 | Athlon X2 6550, 6500, 4450e/b, Athlon X2 4600+, 4400+, 4200+, BE-2400 |
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 Celeron E1600 | Athlon 64 X2 4000+, 3800+ Athlon X2 4050e, BE-2300 |
| Pentium Dual-Core E2160, E2140 Celeron E1500, E1400, E1200 | |
Summary
There you have it folks: the best gaming CPUs for the money this month. Now all that’s left to do is to find and purchase them.
Also remember that the stores don’t follow this list. Things will change over the course of the month and you’ll probably have to adapt your buying strategy to deal with fluctuating prices. Good luck!
I have an E8500. Nothing wrong in an 'old fashioned' quick processor. When I bought it I couldn't justify the price increase for a 3Ghz+ quad core. I use it for simulating the physics of electrical components and systems as part of my uni work. These programs are old, referencing ‘cards’ and ‘stacks’ in the error codes, so have never heard of multi-threading. The E8500 provides a large amount of required brute force for those applications. It does see its fair share of gaming too! No complaints about the performance there either. Best of all, while going flat out on both cores, it won’t try to melt its way through the floor. (that could be because I threw the stock cooler away??)
Yes, you can buy a better/newer/expensive cpu but unless you really have to have the 4 cores I don’t think the expense is justified (yet). Especially for me when upgrading to Intel’s latest offering will mean a whole new motherboard and memory too. I’ll have to stick with the E8500 for a few more years.
It would take a Lottery win for a £300+ cpu.
Great review. I just bought a x2 5200+ for a client and I have no complaints whatsoever. I'd also like to add that despite a thermal pad, the retail cooler does an awesome job..it's barely even warm under load and you can hardly hear it. Couldn't ask for more.
Note: The Athlon II X2 250 is incorrectly listed as 2.8GHz in the chart, instead of 3GHz
Sorry to be pedantic, but I think some more data is wrong for the following CPU's:
Athlon II X2 250
. 2x 128K L1 cache (not 2x 64K)
Phenom II X2 545
. 2x 128K L1 cache (not 2x 64K)
. 2x 512K L2 cache (not 2x 1MB)
And the new X4-945 revision has been out for a while, so all the ones on the shelves currently are 95W TDP units, not 125W!
Funny how there are no "unfortunate mistakes" with the Intel CPU listings! Given Don did this article methinks one of the Intal-sponsored editors went around the article with the bullshitometer!
Not a bad article at all. I'm personally very happy with my Q6600 (B3, not G0 unfortunately), which is sitting at 3.2 GHz. I know the i7-920 could beat it at about 2.8GHz, maybe lower, but not by enough to justify the cost of an upgrade from my X48-based system.
I personally need a multi-core PC for 3D rendering that I let my flatmate do while I'm in work, and for my own personal Flight Sim enjoyment. Maybe I'll upgrade to an 8-core i9 someday.
Another good article Don. I think your def the best reviewer here now and the unbiased careful language you use is a big plus.
You could also do an article on the best cpu for the buck in terms of raw overclocking (that's doable, stable and on the stock cooler though)for gaming.
My thoughts are the E5xxx and low end Q9xxx series are probably the best bang for the buck in that department as I would leave out the 65nm parts are they are getting harder to get now.
Possibly the triple core 45nm AMD parts would also give them a run for the money with the extra core ... based on price / performance.
I'd concentrate on three games only and average the scores, and pick a few dual, triple and quads, and compare the 45nm penryn, 45nm AMD dual, triple and quad, and throw in a couple of i7's.
This should keep you busy in the lab and it would be a great little piece I think.
Probably need some charts and stay well below 4Ghz where the thermals become an issue for cooling ... remember stock coolers !!
I think it would be a shootout between the dual core 45nm E5's and the AMD tripples ... just a prediction.
The E5200 might just get there ?
Work on $ per frame eh?
I think this article fails to mention one thing about the e8500, when ran at stock, expect temperatures of 80-90+ celcius. Seriously, the thing comes with a non copper heatsink, and was running at 90+ celcius. Im sure some people have a lot better cooling setup inside, but for a HTPC, im not so sure, because if you have to get a 3rd party heatsink and fan, goodluck fitting it inside one of those machines
what about the athlon 7750 be , I got mine for under £50 brand new and it outperforms the 5200 on nearly everything at stock and it overclocks to 3 ghz easily
Prices in $ and link to price comparison is to a US version.
Really starting to give up on THG. Bit-tech is far far superior at the moment.