Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

The Truth Behind Apple's iPad

by - source: Tom's Hardware US

It's a console.

Apple's iPad, which launched today to much fanfare, is simply an enabling platform. Those who have the iPhone or iPod Touch, know what it's like, for the most part, to use the iPad.

Sure, the iPad's got a much larger screen, and a faster processor, and even 3G, but it's just a bigger iPod Touch.

The killer application for the iPhone, was in fact, its ability to fit right into your pocket. Can you see yourself grabbing an iPad while you dash out your front door? Not me. It's big. And I already have my notebook, which also happens to be a MacBook Pro. Sure, call me an Apple fanboy, I don't care. My main desktop is in fact, a custom built PC. But even someone like me who has an Apple product, I can't vouch for the iPad.

The most critical point about the iPad, is the fact that it can't multi-task. Like the iPod Touch and the iPhone, it can only run one application at any given time. Despite having a powerful CPU on the inside, the iPad is crippled because of its operating system, the same operating system behind the iPhone. Fundamentally, if you already have a notebook and an iPhone, the iPad will have a difficult time finding a place in your daily routine.

The truth.

The iPad is a console, in every sense of the word. The real money maker for Apple, is the App Store. The iPad will capture the audiences that the iPhone/iPod Touch wasn't, and then some. It'll also capture the core Apple audience too. I've talked to a few real Apple fans today, and even they difficulty wrapping their heads around the iPad.

The iPad is a closed system. You can't do anything you want to it. Apps must be from the App Store. Like an SNES, or a PS3, software must be sanctioned. And like consoles, only one game can be played at any given time. And Like those consoles makers, the money is in the software (for consoles, it was the license to make software).

The iTunes store, the App store, and now the iBook store. Even if Apple sold each iPad for $50, it would make back its losses in a very short time period.

Truth be told, the magic should have been in the software. Given that the iPad is a tablet, we can understand that it doesn't have a keyboard. But not to be able to let its owner run more than one app is a miserable thing. The OS could have been so much more for the iPad. What the iPad should have shipped with, was OS X, with a tablet designed UI--not a tablet, with the iPhone OS.

Like a console though, it almost doesn't matter. It's all about getting people onto the App Store and making small payments, but a lot of small payments. One closed system, many software purchases. And because of the iPhone's already enormous popularity, it's not hard to convince just even those users, to hop on the iPad.

No doubt, there will be some instances where the iPad can deliver some unique uses. But for power users who love their software and want to get things done, there are alternatives.

Share:
8
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
mi1ez 28/01/2010 09:23
Hide
-1+

Good call. I'm fed up of all my friends talking about this.

praetorianguard 28/01/2010 10:36
Hide
-0+

An honest, unbiased and factual article for once. How nice.
Too bad that the same cannot be said for its subject. Such a disappointment. Other tablets, and smart phones, are more versatile than this thing. No multitasking?! What if I need to update a spreadsheet with data I've just found online while taking notes over my morning coffee? An instant failure right there.
And the closed system will alienate prospective users like myself. It could have been so much better, but I fear that Microsoft & HP et al's offering unveiled recently will be far better.

tstebbens 28/01/2010 13:37
Hide
-1+

We're one step closer to being the bloke in the yellow jersey you see wondering round in the background with his iPad in all the STTNG episodes. As long as having one doesn't increase your chances of being killed by aliens or a freak warp core explosion...

Can't see myself getting one. I can't think of a use for it where either a laptop or XDA wouldn't be a better choice.

praetorianguard 28/01/2010 16:26
Hide
-1+

@Rab1d-BDGR

Rab1d-BDGR :
Me, I don't have the cash to spare but if I did I would get an open platform like the HP slate as I don't like being dictated to.



I couldn't agree more. I too would get a device like the new HP creation if I had the cash. They do have proper functionality like multitasking and they aren't locked to any specific service *cough*dictatorship*cough*.

mi1ez 28/01/2010 16:42
Hide
-1+

I really am struggling to find who's going to use it. Every time I think I've cracked it I realise there are more suitable devices.

mcnaugha 28/01/2010 20:47
Hide
--1+

Hmm... I could be wrong but I think Apple has told us time and time again... they're not making much profit at all from the App Store. It's the developers that make the most money. So this is yet another ignorant article by Tuan. Sorry mate but you really should get your facts straight. You're just not with it.

Anonymous 24/05/2010 05:04
Hide
-0+

I invented the iPad
It is meant to be similar to the iPhone and iPod Touch.
If You have any questions about it contact me by
email.

Anonymous 24/05/2010 05:07
Hide
-0+

tvrtkorajcevic@gmail.com

Best offers

Newsletters


OK